DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COMPARISON OF VIABILITY OF ORAL EPITHELIAL CELLS STORED BY DIFFERENT FREEZING METHODS

구강상피세포의 냉동보관 방법에 따른 세포생존률 비교

  • Baek, Do-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei, University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Jong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei, University) ;
  • Jung, Han-Sung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei, University) ;
  • Kim, Eui-Seong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei, University)
  • 백도영 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이승종 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 정한성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김의성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

This study examined the influence of the storage methods on the viability of oral epithelial cells using conventional cell freezing storage, slow freezing preservation, rapid freezing preservation, and slow freezing preservation with a pressure of 2 Mpa or 3 Mpa. The cell viability was evaluated by cell counting, WST-1 and the clonogenic capacity after 6 days of freezing storage. After 6 days, the frozen cells were thawed rapidly, and the cell counting. WST-1, and clonogenic capacity values were measured and compared. 1. The results from cell counting demonstrated that conventional cryopreservation, slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure and slow freezing under a 3 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p < 0.05). 2. The results from the optical density by WST-1 demonstrated that slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p<0.05). 3. The clonogenic capacity demonstrated that slow freezing under a 2 Mpa pressure showed significantly higher values than slow freezing preservation and rapid freezing preservation (p < 0.05).

본 연구의 목적은 구강상피세포를 배양한후 각기 다른 조건의 냉동 보존법으로 6일간 보존시 각각의 세포의 활성도를 Cell counting, WST-1, Clonogenic capacity의 방법을 이용하여 비교 평가하기 위함이다. 각 실험군당 $1\times10^6$개의 세포를 다음의 방법으로 6일간 냉동 보존한다. Freezing container에 담아 $1^{\circ}C$/min의 냉동속도로 $-70^{\circ}C$까지 냉동 후 $-196^{\circ}C$에 냉동하여 보관한 일반 냉동 보존군, 세포를 바로 $-196^{\circ}C$의 액화질소에 넣어 냉동한 급속 냉동 보존군, $4^{\circ}C$에서 $-35^{\circ}C$까지 $-0.5^{\circ}C$/min속도로 서서히 냉동시킨 뒤 $-196^{\circ}C$에 냉동한 저속 냉동 보존군, 2 Mpa, 3 Mpa의 압력을 가하고 $-0.5^{\circ}C$/min속도로 $4^{\circ}C$에서 $-35^{\circ}C$까지 서서히 냉동시킨 뒤 $-196^{\circ}C$에 냉동한 2 Mpa, 3 Mpa압력 저속 냉동 보존군으로 나누었다. 6일 후 냉동되었던 세포를 급속 해빙하여 각각의 Cell counting, WST-1, Clonogenic capacity 값을 측정하여 비교하였다. 실험 결과 2 Mpa혹은 3 Mpa의 압력을 이용한 저속 냉동법이 저속 냉동법 및 급속 냉동법 보다 세포 활성도에 있어 우수한 경향을 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김재욱, 김의성, 김진, 이승종. 급속냉동된 쥐 치아의 in vivo MTT 검색법을 이용한 치주인대세포 활성도 평가. 대한치과보존학회지 31: 192-202, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.3.192
  2. Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am J Physiol 247:125-42, 1984.
  3. Farrant J. Water transport and cell survival in cryobiological procedures. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278 (959):191-205, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0037
  4. Fujikawa S. 'Freeze-fracture and etching studies on membrane damage on human erythrocytes caused by formation of intracellular ice.' Cryobiology 17 (4):351-62, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(80)90042-5
  5. Diller KR, Cravalho EG. A cryomicroscope for the study of freezing and thawing processes in biological cells. Cryobiology 7 (4):191-9, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(70)90021-0
  6. Kawata T. Tooth transplantation by teeth bankapproach to human-Hiroshima. Department of Orthodontics, Hiroshima University School of Dentistry, 2005
  7. 안현정, 김의성, 김진, 김덕원, 김기열, 이찬영, 이승종. 자기장 저속 냉동보관법을 이용한 쥐 치아 치주인대세포의 활성도 검사. 대한치과보존학회지 33:332-240, 2008 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.332
  8. Pribenszky C, Molnar M, Cseh S, Solti L. Improving post-thaw survival of cryopreserved mouse blastocysts by hydrostatic pressure challenge. Anim Reprod Sci 87(2):143-50, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.09.007
  9. Pribenszky C, Molnar M, Ulrich P, et al. Pressure assisted cryopreser vation. Reprod Dom Anim 40:228-344, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00586.x
  10. Kuo YH, Pribenszky Cs, Huang SY. Higher litter size is achieved by the insemination of high hydrostatic pressure-treated frozen-thawed boar semen. Theriogenology 70:1395-96, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.061
  11. Berridge MV, Tan AS, McCoy KD, Wang R. The biochemical and cellular basis of cell proliferation assays that use tetrazolium salts. Biochemica 4:15-20, 1996
  12. Alotto D, Ariotti S, Graziano S, Verrua R, Stella M, Magliacani G, Castagnoli C. The role of quality control in a skin bank: tissue viability determination. Cell and Tissue banking 3(1):3-10, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021846703301
  13. Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, et al.'Outcome of tooth transplantation: survival and success rates 17-41 years posttreatment.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2):110-9;quiz 193, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119979
  14. Jonsson T, Sigurdsson TJ. 'Autotransplantation of premolars to premolar sites. A long-term follow-up study of 40 consecutive patients.' Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125(6):668-75, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.002
  15. Mazur P. 'Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos.' Cell Biophys 17(1):53-92, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989804
  16. Mazur P, Leibo SP, Chu EH. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res 71(2):345-55, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(72)90303-5
  17. Rapatz G, Sullivan JJ, et al. 'Preservation of erythrocytes in blood containing various cryoprotective agents, frozen at various rates and brought to a given final temperature.' Cryobiology 5(1):18-25, 1968 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(68)80139-7
  18. Thorpe PE, Knight SC, et al. 'Optimal conditions for the preservation of mouse lymph node cells in liquid nitrogen using cooling rate techniques.' Cryobiology 13(2):126-33, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(76)90123-1
  19. Leibo SP, McGrath JJ, et al. 'Microscopic observation of intracellular ice formation in unfertilized mouse ova as a function of cooling rate.' Cryobiology 15(3):257-71, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(78)90036-6
  20. Abe F, Kato C, Horikoshi K. Pressure regulated metabolism in microorganisms. Trends Microbiol 7 (11):447-453, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01608-X
  21. Aldridge BE, Bruner LJ. Pressure effects on mechanisms of charge transport across bilayer membranes. Biochem Biophys Acta 817 (2):343-354, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(85)90037-9
  22. Huang SY, Pribenszky C, Kuo YH, et al. The effect of hydrostatic pressure treatment on the protein profile of boar spermatozoa before and after freezing. Theriogenology 70:1391, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.051
  23. Parsell DA, Lindquist S. The function of heat shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Ann Rev Genet 27:437-96, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.002253
  24. Pelham HR. Heat shock proteins: coming in from cold. Nature 332:776-7, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1038/332776a0
  25. Du Y, Lin L, Schmidt M, Bogh IB, Kragh PM, Sorensen CB, Li J, Purup S, Pribenszky C, Molnar M, Kuwayama M, Zhang X, Yang H, Bolund L, Vajta G. High hydrostatic pressure treatment of porcine oocytes before handmade cloning improves developmental competence and cryosurvival. Cloning and stem cells 10(3):325-30, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2007.0089
  26. 이영은, 김의성, 김진, 한승훈, 이승종. 압력 저속 냉동 방법의 쥐 치아 치주인대세포 보존 효율 평가. 대한치과보존학회지 34:356-363, 2009 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.4.356

Cited by

  1. The evaluation of periodontal ligament cells of rat teeth after low-temperature preservation under high pressure vol.35, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.285
  2. Evaluation of the Viability of Rat Periodontal Ligament Cells after Storing at 0℃/2 MPa Condition up to One Week: In Vivo MTT Method vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2016.9.1.1