Price Competition in Horizontal and Vertical Differentiation : Focusing on the WiBro and HSDPA

수직적.수평적 차별화 시장에서의 서비스 요금전략 : 와이브로와 HSDPA 서비스를 중심으로

  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze the mobile broadband services market characterized by vertical and horizontal differentiation. Vertical differentiation as service quality differentiation is based on the transmission speed of mobile internet service and horizontal differentiation as spatial differentiation is based on the service coverage. Theoretical explanations for the competitive price policy have been developed in the game context of WiBro which represent the high quality within the limited service coverage and HSDPA which represent relatively low quality with nation-wide service. When the WiBro has a mobile broadband service quality advantage and the difference in quality is sufficiently low, the price of WiBro with limited service coverage is relatively lower than that of HSDPA. This occurs because the advantage of WiBro's vertical service differentiation is offset by the disadvantage of horizontal differentiation. The difference in the quality of mobile internet service, however, is not too high, the price of WiBro is relatively higher than that of HSDPA. Moreover, when the service quality of WiBro is sufficiently high, the low quality HSDPA service faces no demand.

Keywords

References

  1. KT 휴대인터넷사업본부, 'WiBro와 HSDPA현황과 전망', KT, 2008
  2. 김대중, 'WiBro 국제표준 채택과정', 'TTA Journal' 제114호(2007), pp.44-52
  3. 김문구, 지경용, 박종현, '신규 유무선 융합 서비스의 수요전망과 시장위상 : 와이브로를 중심으로', 'Telecomnmications Review' 제16권, 제1호 (2006), p25-34
  4. 김문구, 지경용, 박종현, ;디지털 컨버전스 시대의 모바일 브로드밴드 전개 : 와이브로와 HSDPA', '한국통신학회지', 제26권, 제45호(2006), pp.81-88
  5. 주종옥, WiBro의 IMT-2000표준채택 의의와 시사점', '정보통신정책' 제19권, 제21호(2007), pp.1-19
  6. Aoki, R. and T.J. Prusa, 'Sequential versus simultaneous choice with endogenous quality,' International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vo1.15(1996), pp.103-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(95)00516-1
  7. Choi, S.C. and A.T. Coughlan, 'Private label positioning: Quality versus feature differentiation from the national brancl,' Journal of Retailing, Vol.82, No.2(2006), pp.79-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2006.02.005
  8. Crampes, C. and A. Hollander, 'Duopoly and quality standards,' European Economic Review, Vol.39(1995), pp.71-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00041-W
  9. d'Aspremont, C., J. Gabszewics and J.F. Thisse, 'On Hotelling's Stability in Competition,' Econometrica, Vol.17(1979) pp.1145-1151
  10. Gabszewics, J, and J,F. Thisse, 'Pricing competition, quality and income disparities,' Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.20(1979), pp.340-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(79)90041-3
  11. HoteIling, H, 'Stability in competition,' Economic Journal, Vol.39(1929) pp.41-57 https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214
  12. Lancaster, K, Variety, Efficiency and Equity, Columbia University Press, NY, 1979
  13. Lehmann-Grube, U., 'Strategic choice of quality when quality is costly: the persistence of the high-quality advantage,' RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.28, No.2(1997), pp.372-384 https://doi.org/10.2307/2555811
  14. Mangani, A, 'Profit and audience maximization in broadcasting markets,' Information Eanarics and Policy, Vol.15(2003), pp.305-315 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00112-9
  15. Ronnen, U, 'Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition,' RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.22, No.4(1991), pp.490-504 https://doi.org/10.2307/2600984
  16. Sayman, Serdar, Stephen J Hoch and Raju S. Jagmohan, 'Positioning of Store Brands,' Marketing Science, Vol.21, No.4(2002), pp.378-397 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.21.4.378.134
  17. Shaked, A and J Shtton, 'Relaxing price competition through product differentiation,' Review of Economic Studies, Vol.49(1982), pp.3-13 https://doi.org/10.2307/2297136
  18. Tirole, Jean, The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1989