DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Basic Principles of the Validation for Good Laboratory Practice Institutes

  • Cho, Kyu-Hyuk (Division of Inhalation Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Sung (Department of Non-clinical Studies, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Jeon, Man-Soo (Korea GMP Academy Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Hong (Division of Inhalation Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Chung, Moon-Koo (Department of Non-clinical Studies, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Song, Chang-Woo (Division of Inhalation Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
  • Published : 2009.03.01

Abstract

Validation specifies and coordinates all relevant activities to ensure compliance with good laboratory practices (GLP) according to suitable international standards. This includes validation activities of past, present and future for the best possible actions to ensure the integrity of non-clinical laboratory data. Recently, validation has become increasingly important, not only in good manufacturing practice (GMP) institutions but also in GLP facilities. In accordance with the guideline for GLP regulations, all equipments used to generate, measure, or assess data should undergo validation to ensure that this equipment is of appropriate design and capacity and that it will consistently function as intended. Therefore, the implantation of validation processes is considered to be an essential step in a global institution. This review describes the procedures and documentations required for validation of GLP. It introduces basic elements such as the validation master plan, risk assessment, gap analysis, design qualification, installation qualification, operational qualification, performance qualification, calibration, traceability, and revalidation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bedson, P. and Sargent, M. (1996), The development and application of guidance on equipment qualification of analytical instruments, Accred. Qual. Assur, 1, 265-274 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050083
  2. Bridges, D. (2005), Compliance requirements for equipment and instrumentation in GLP studies, Society of quality assurance first global QA conference 21st SQA annual meeting preconference training, Florida. USA. pp. 1-17
  3. Brockmeyer, P. (2006), 29th Biological GMP and validation Education, Process Validation Fundamentals, pp. 21-28, Risk Based Process Validation Review & Risk Assessment Example, pp. 5-9
  4. EPA (1989), 40 CFR Part 160, Good Laboratory Practice Standards
  5. EU (2003), Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice Annex 15, Qualification and Validation
  6. Gibson, W. and Powell-Evans, K. (1998), Validation Fundamentals, How to, What to, When to Validate, Interpharm/ CRC, pp. 1-205
  7. Haider, S.I. (2002a), Validation Standard Operating Procedures, A Step-by-Step Guide for Achieving Compliance in the Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Biotech Industries, St. Lucie Press, pp. 3-150
  8. Haider, S.I. (2002b), Pharmaceutical Master Validation Plan, The Ultimate Guide to FDA, GMP, and GLP Compliance. St. Lucie Press, pp. 1-36
  9. Huber, L. (1999), Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories, Interpharm Press, pp. 27-106
  10. Huber, L. (2005), Compliance Requirements for Equipment and Instrumentation in GLP Studies in Gap Analysis, Risk Assessment, & Master Validation Plan, 21st SQA Annul Meeting Preconference Training, Florida, USA
  11. International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005 (2006), General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
  12. KFDA (2005), Good Laboratory Practice Regulation for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (Notification No. 2005-79) issued by Korea Food and Drug Administration
  13. KFDA (2007), Good Clinical Practice Regulation for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (Notification No. 2007-34) issued by Korea Food and Drug Administration
  14. KFDA (2008), Principle of Validation for Drug and Pharmaceutical Regulation for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies (Notification No. 2008-5) issued by Korea Food and Drug Administration
  15. KFDA (2008), Interpretation for Good Laboratory Practice. pp.26-50
  16. Korea Pharmaceutical Technique Association (2000), Pharmaceutical Manufacture and Validation. pp. 15-53
  17. LabComplience (2004), Validation Master Plan, for Equipment, Computer Systems, Networked Systems and Spreadsheet Applications, Ver. 2.07, pp. 1-40
  18. Leveson, N. and Turner, C.S. (1993), An investigation of the therac-25 accidents, IEEE Computer, 26, 18-41 https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1993.274940
  19. Matthews, B.R. (2002), The Devonport incident, the Clothier Report, and related matters - 30 years on, PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol., 56, 137-149
  20. MIHWAF (2008), The Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, Annex 2: Good Manufacturing Practice and Quality Standards
  21. OECD (1997), OECD Principles of Good Laboratories Practice
  22. OECD (1999), Revised Consensus Document, The Study Director in GLP Studies, Environment Monograph No. 99(24)
  23. US FDA (1987), Guideline on General Principles of Process Validation
  24. US FDA (2003), 21 CFR Part 58, Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies
  25. Weinberg, S. (2007), Good Laboratory Practice Regulation, Fourth Edition, Informa Healthcare Press, pp. 60-229
  26. WHO (1996), A WHO Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Requirements, Part 2: Validation
  27. www.labcompliance.com
  28. Yoshihito, O. (1985), Good laboratory practice - principles and present status in Japan, Korean J. of Toxicology, 1, 31-41
  29. Yu, I.J., Chung, Y.H., Maeng, S.H., Song, K.S., Lee, Y.M., Chung, H.K., Kim, H.J., Park, J.I., Lee, S.K., Lee, Y.H. and Chang, J.S. (1999), History of Korean GLPs and activities and perspectives of the Korean Society of GLP, Quality Assurance, 7, 57-62 https://doi.org/10.1080/105294100277732
  30. Yu, I.J., Maeng, S.H., Lee, J.Y., Lee, Y.M. and Chung, H.K.(2000), Designation of a GLP facility by the Korean ministry of environment GLP authority: The case of the center for occupational toxicology, Quality Assurance, 8, 11-17 https://doi.org/10.1080/105294100753209156
  31. Yu, J.H. (2004), Risk Assessment for Validation, IVS,www.validation.co.kr