DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Primary Cervical Dystonia with Phasic Type : Clinical Outcome and Postoperative Course

  • Jeong, Seong-Gyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Bongseng Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, Bongseng Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Ju-Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Bongseng Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Jun, Sung-Man (Department of Neurology, Bongseng Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Won-Ho (Department of Neurology, Bongseng Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Ghang, Chang-Ghu (Department of Neurosurgery, Bongseng Memorial Hospital)
  • Published : 2009.10.28

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to analyze in detail the relationship between outcome and time course of effect in medically refractory primary cervical dystonia (CD) with phasic type that was treated by bilateral globus pallidus internus (Gpi) deep brain stimulation (DBS). Methods : Six patients underwent bilateral implantation of DBS into the Gpi under the guide of microelectrode recording and were followed for $18.7{\pm}11.1$ months. The mean duration of the CD was $5.8{\pm}3.4$ years. The mean age at time of surgery was $54.2{\pm}10.2$ years. Patients were evaluated with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and relief scale using patient self-reporting. Results : The TWSTRS total scores improved by 64.5%, 65.5%, 75.8%, and 76.0% at 3, 6, 12 months, and at the last available follow-up after surgery, respectively. Statistically significant improvements in the TWSTRS scores were observed 3 months after surgery (p=0.028) with gradual improvement up to 12 months after surgery, thereafter, the improvement was sustained. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the scores at 3 and 12 months. Subjective improvement reported averaged $81.7{\pm}6.8%$ at last follow-up. Mild dysarthria, the most frequent adverse event, occurred in 3 patients. Conclusions : Our results show that the bilateral Gpi-DBS can offer a significant therapeutic effect from 3 months postoperatively in patients with primary CD with phasic type, without significant side effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Dauer WT, Burke RE, Greene P, Fahn S : Current concepts on the clinical features, aetiology and management of idiopathic cervical dystonia. Brain 121 : 547-560, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.547
  2. Deuschl G, Heinen F, Kleedorfer B, Wagner M, Lucking CH, Poewe W : Clinical and polymyographic investigation of spasmodic torticollis. J Neurol 239 : 9-15, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00839204
  3. Hung SW, Hamani C, Lozano AM, Poon YY, Piboolnurak P, Miyasaki JM, et al : Long-term outcome of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary cervical dystonia. Neurology 68 : 457-459, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000252932.71306.89
  4. Isaias IU, Alterman RL, Tagliati M : Outcome predictors of pallidal stimulation in patients with primary dystonia : the role of disease duration. Brain 131 : 1895-1902, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn120
  5. Jang KS, Park HK, Joo WI, Ji C, Lee KJ, Choi CR : Selective peripheral denervation for the treatment of spasmodic torticollis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 37 : 350-353, 2005
  6. Kiss ZH, Doig-Beyaert K, Eliasziw M, Tsui J, Haffenden A, Suchowersky O : The Canadian multicentre study of deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia. Brain 130 : 2879-2886, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm229
  7. Krauss JK, Loher TJ, Pohle T, Weber S, Taub E, B?rlocher CB, et al : Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with cervical dystonia and severe cervical dyskinesias with cervical myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72 : 249-256, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.2.249
  8. Kuncel AM, Grill WM : Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115 : 2431-2441, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.031
  9. Kupsch A, Benecke R, Muller J, Trottenberg T, Schneider GH, Poewe W, et al : Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia. N Engl J Med 355 : 1978-1990, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa063618
  10. Laitinen LV, Bergenheim AT, Hariz MI : Leksell’s posteroventral pallidotomy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg 76 : 53-61, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.76.1.0053
  11. Vayssiere N, van der Gaag N, Cif L, Hemm S, Verdier R, Frerebeau P, et al : Deep brain stimulation for dystonia confirming a somatotopic organization in the globus pallidus internus. sonographic monitoring of electrode placement into the globus pallidus internus. J Neurosurg 101 : 181-188, 2004 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0181
  12. Yianni J, Bain PG, Gregory RP, Nandi D, Joint C, Scott RB, et al. : Post-operative progress of dystonia patients following globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation. Eur J Neurol 10 : 239-247, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00592.x
  13. Yianni J, Nandi D, Shad A, Bain P, Gregory R, Aziz T : Increased risk of lead fracture and migration in dystonia compared with other movement disorders following deep brain stimulation. J Clin Neurosci 11 : 243-245, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2003.10.003

Cited by

  1. Outcome of Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Meige Syndrome vol.48, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.2.134
  2. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus in a 7-Year-Old Girl with DYT1 Generalized Dystonia vol.52, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.3.261
  3. Treatment of Focal Dystonia vol.14, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-012-0169-6
  4. Predictive factors of outcome in primary cervical dystonia following pallidal deep brain stimulation vol.28, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25560
  5. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia vol.84, pp.9, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-301714
  6. Bilateral pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: blinded evidence of benefit beyond 5 years vol.136, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt009
  7. Pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia: a case series : Clinical article vol.12, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.8.peds13134