DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Survey and Economic Analysis of Food Industry Residues for Biomass-to-energy Conversion in Merced and Stanislaus Counties, California, USA

바이오에너지로의 전환을 위한 캘리포니아 식품가공공장 오.폐수 특성 조사 및 경제성 분석

  • Kim, Dae-Hyun (KSAM, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • Published : 2009.08.25

Abstract

This research expands investigations into the biomass resource potential associated with California's food processing industry by surveying industries within a two county region in the San Joaquin Valley, California, USA. A previous survey conducted in 2005 for the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) quantified residue and waste generation from food processors and food preparation businesses in the Sacramento region. The present survey investigates residue and waste streams from food processors located in Merced and Stanislaus Counties. Sixty food processors were identified to participate in the survey, of which 49 responded (82%) and data were acquired for 38 (63%) (6 facilities closed or moved, 8 decided not to participate). Within the two counties, total annual waste among survey respondents amounted to 24,044 dry tons of high moisture (${\geq}$60%) food residuals, 5,358 dry tons of low moisture (<60%) food residuals; and 23.7 million $m^3$ of wastewater containing 38,814 tons of biochemical oxygen demand ($BOD_5$). The total potential electric power generation from these food residues was estimated at approximately $7\;MW_e$. Total solid waste resource included in the survey response was estimated at about 10% of statewide residue generation for processors falling within the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) System Major Group 20 (Food and Kindred Products) categories.

Keywords

References

  1. Amon, R., D.B. Kazama, T. Wong and R. Neenan. 2008. California's Food Processing Industry Energy Efficiency Initiative: Adoption of Industrial Best Practices. CEC 400-2008-006-REV, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA, USA
  2. Eastern Research Group, Inc. and Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. 2007. Opportunities for and benefits of combined heat and power at wastewater treatment facilities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., April. Available from http://www.epa.gov/chp/markets/wastewater.html
  3. Jenkins, B. M. 2005. Biomass in California: challenges, opportunities, and potentials for sustainable management and development. PIER Collaborative Report, Contract 500-01-016, California Biomass Collaborative, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
  4. Liu, D. H. F. and B. G. Liptak. 2000. Hazardous Waste and Solid Waste. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
  5. Matteson, G. C. and B. M. Jenkins. 2007. Food and processing residues in California: Resource assessment and potential for power generation. Bioresource Technology 98:3098-3105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.031
  6. Matteson, G. C., R. Zhang and H. El-Mashad. 2005. Food residuals survey for Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
  7. Rao, B. R., P. R. Weckler and T. J. Bowser. 2004. Gasification of food and agricultural processing byproducts - an economic waste handling alternative. Paper No. 046143, ASABE, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA
  8. Rapport, J.L. 2008. Modeling the engineering design and financial feasibility of the anaerobic phased solids digester system configured to produce electricity, heat, and natural gas from organic solid waste. Unpublished MS thesis, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
  9. Williams, R. 2005. Technology assessment for biomass power generation: summary report on economic analyses. Interim report to the Sacramento Municipal Utility District and California Energy Commission, Contact 500-00-034, Sacramento, CA, USA