DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Secondary Productivity of Pelagic Zooplankton in lake Paldang and lake Cheongpyeong

  • Kang, Ji-Soon (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Joo, Sung-Bae (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Nam, Sung-Jin (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Jeong, Ga-Ram (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Yang, Dong-Woo (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Hae-Kyung (Han-River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Sang-Kyu (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University)
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

We estimated monthly and annual secondary productivity of pelagic zooplankton in Lake Paldang and Lake Cheongpyong. Secondary productivity was calculated by combining estimated zooplankton biomass and biomass-specific productivity for each site and depth from March to November 2008. In addition to somatic production, we measured production of eggs and exuviae for three dominant species: Daphnia galeata, Bosmina longirostris, Cyclops sp. In terms of biomass, B. longirostris was dominant in Lake Paldang in April and May, B. longirostris showed explosive biomass growth, especially in May. In June and July, B. longirostris and D. galeata were both dominant. Lake Cheongpyeong showed much lower zooplankton biomass than Lake Paldang. In August, there was little or no biomass in both lakes probably due to heavy rain. The Gyeongan River contributed most of the secondary productivity and B. longirostris contributed the most secondary productivity in Lake Paldang. D. galeata also contributed in the Gyeongan River, the South Han River and at the Paldang Dam in spring and fall. Overall, Lake Cheongpyeong showed lower secondary productivity than Lake Paldang. B. longirostris made the largest contribution to secondary productivity in the Cheongpyeong Dam area while D. galeata contributed the most near Nami Island. Somatic production constituted ~80% of the total secondary productivity (the sum of somatic, egg and exuvia production) for D. galeata and B. longirostris. Although production-to-biomass (P/B) ratios were usually <<1 B. longirostris sometimes showed very high P/B ratios, probably due to fish predation. D. galeata showed much lower P/B ratios than B. longirostris after the summer at most sites.

Keywords

References

  1. Adrian R, Deneke R. 1996. Possible impact of mild winters on zooplankton succession in eutrophic lakes of the Atlantic European area. Freshwater BioI 36: 757-770 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.00126.x
  2. Baumann M. 1995. A comment on transfer efficiencies. Fish Oceanogr 4: 264-266 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.1995.tb00150.x
  3. Benke AC. 1998. Production dynamics of riverine chironomids: extremly high biomass turn over rates of primary consumers. Ecology 79: 899-910 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0899:PDORCE]2.0.CO;2
  4. Bottrell HH, Duncan A, Gliwicz ZM, Grygierrek E, Herzig A, Kurazawa H, Larsson P, Weglenska T. 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton studies. Norwegian J Zool 24: 416-456
  5. Cauchie HM, Hoffmann L, Thom$\'{e}$ JP. 2000. Metazooplankton dynamics and secondary production of Daphnia magna (Crustacea) in an aerated waste stabilization pond. J Plankton Res 22: 2263-2287 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/22.12.2263
  6. Choi JS. 2005. Fish fauna and community in Cheongpyeong reservoir. Kor J Limnol 38: 63-72
  7. Dumont HJ, Van de Velde I, Dumont S. 1975. The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, Periphyton and Benthos of Continental Waters. Oecologia 19: 75-97 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377592
  8. Goodman KS. 1980. The estimation of individual dry weight and standing crop ofharpacticoid copepods. Hydobiologia 72: 253-259 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005629
  9. Guntzel AM, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Rocha O. 2003. Life cycle of Macrothrix flabelligera Smirnov, 1992 (Cladocera, Macrothricidae), recently reported in the Neotropical region. Hydrobiologia 490: 87-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023414612650
  10. Han River Environment Research Center. 2008. Annual Report 2008. Han River Environment Research Center, Yangsuri
  11. Hilbricht-Ilkowska A. 1977. Trophic relations and energy flow in pelagic plankton. Pol Ecol Stud 3: 3-98
  12. Kimmerer WJ. 1987. The theory of secondary production calculations for continously reproducing populations. Limnol Oceanogr 32: 1-13 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0001
  13. Kobayashi TP. Gibbs P. Dixon I, Shiel RJ. 1996. Grazing by a River Zooplankton Community: Importance of Microzooplankton, Freshwater Res 47:1025-36 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9961025
  14. Kong DS, Yoon IB, Ryu JK. 1996. Hydrological characteristics and water budget of Lake Paldang. Korean J Limnol 29: 51-64
  15. Lee H, Han H. 2005. Analysis of lake water temperature and seasonal stratification in the Han River System from timeseries of Landsat images. Korean J Remote Sensing 21: 253-271 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2005.21.4.253
  16. Matsumura-Tundisi T, Rietzler AC, Tundisi JG. 1989. Biomass (dry weight and carbon content) of plankton crustacea from Broa reservoir (Sao Carlos, S.P.-Brazil) and its fluctuation across one year. Hydrobiologia 179: 229-236 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006636
  17. Mu-$\"{u}$ller-Navarra DC, Lampert W. 1996. Seasonal patterns of food limitation in Daphnia galeata: separating food quantity and food quality effects. J Plankton Res 18: 1137-1157 https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/18.7.1137
  18. M$\"{u}$ller-Navarra DC, Brett MT, Liston AM, Goldman CR. 2000. A highly unsaturated fatty acid predicts carbon transfer between primary producers and consumers. Nature 403: 74-77 https://doi.org/10.1038/47469
  19. Park S, Goldman CR. 2008. Prediction of Daphnia production along a trophic gradient. J Ecol Field Biol 31: 125-129 https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.2.125
  20. Han River Environmental Research Center. 2008. Survey on the Environment and Ecosystem of Lakes in Han River System
  21. Pauly D, Christensen V. 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255-257 https://doi.org/10.1038/374255a0
  22. Poulet SA, Ianora A, Laabir M, Klein Breteler WCM. 1995. Towards the measurement of secondary production and recruitment in copepods. ICES J Mar Sci 52: 359-368 https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-3139(95)80051-4
  23. Riemann B, Christoffersen K. 1993. Microbial trophodynamics in temperate lakes. Mar Microb Food Webs 7: 69-100
  24. Shin Y, Park HK, Lee SW, Kong DS. 2007. Comparison of carbonaceous sediment oxygen demand in Lake Paldang and Lake Chungju. Korean J Limnol 40: 439-448
  25. Strait D. 1998. Biomass allocation and carbon flow in the pelagic food web of Lake Constance. Adv Limnol 53: 545-563
  26. Turner JT, Tester PA. 1997. Toxic marine phytoplankton, zooplankton grazers, and pelagic food webs. Limnol Oceanogr 42: 1203-1214 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1203
  27. Weisse T, Stockner JG. 1993. Eutrophication: the role of microbial food webs. Mem Ist ital Idrobiol 52: 133-150

Cited by

  1. Effects of Road Deicer Runoff on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Korean Freshwaters with Toxicity Tests of Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) vol.225, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-1961-6