DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation on the Record Completeness of the Nursing Process in Electronic Nursing Record for Patients Undertaken Gastrectomy

전자간호기록에 사용된 간호과정 완성도 분석 - 위절제술 환자를 중심으로 -

  • Park, Ihn Sook (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Cheong Suk (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Soon Hyeung (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Woo, Kyung Shun (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Joo, Young Hee (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Woan Heui (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Hyun Sook (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Mi Ra (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hee Jin (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Mi Ok (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Su Hee (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Seon Yeong (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2009.09.30
  • Accepted : 2009.10.23
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the record completeness of the nursing process in the Electronic Nursing Record(ENR) in a university hospital. Methods: We compared nursing statements documented in 2004 with those from the year 2007, given the fact that the ENR system had been utilized since 2004. The ENRs of 35 gastrectomy patients in each year were selected for evaluation. The selected data were 11,822 nursing statements in 2004 and 27,870 in 2007. Results: The number of nursing records which documented the whole nursing process completely was 4,010 (48.3%) in 2007, whereas 513 (5.9%) in 2004 (p<.001). The number of incomplete records in 2004 was 8,142 (94.1%), while 4,300 (51.7%) in 2007 (p<.001). The number of nursing diagnoses was 846 in 2004 and 4,313 in 2007, which increased in number more than 5 times. The most frequently used diagnoses were 'pain', 'risk for infection' and 'risk for ileus' in both years. Conclusion: There was a significant increase in the record completeness on nursing process in 2007 compared to the records in 2004. The reasons for this increase are attributed to nurse training for encouraging to complete recording and nursing record auditing.

Keywords

References

  1. 강현숙, 박인숙, 이순형, 우경선, 주영희, 최완희 등(2008, 5). 전자간호기록을 이용한 간호과정 적용 사례 연구. 대한의료정보학회 춘계학술대회 초록집, 서울.
  2. 김덕희, 김선애, 김소선, 김창경, 박인숙, 이영선(편).(2008). ENR 시스템에서의 간호과정 적용. 서울: 대한간호협회.
  3. 김윤정, 박현애(2005). 간호과정에 따른 개심술 환자의 간호기록 분석 -간호결과 중심으로-. 대한의료정보학회지, 11(1), 45-55.
  4. 김은만, 박인숙, 신현주, 안태사, 김영아, 오필주 등(2005). 전자간호기록에 사용된 표준간호진술문의 활용실태. 임상간호연구, 11(1), 149-164.
  5. 박현애, 김정은, 조인숙(2000). 간호진단, 중재, 결과 분류체계. 서울: 서울대학교출판부.
  6. 보건복지부, 한국보건산업진흥원(2007). 2007 의료기관 평가 지침서. 서울: 저자.
  7. 서문자(1998). 간호중재분류체계에 대한 최신경향. 간호학논문집, 12(1), 1-14.
  8. 서울대학교병원(편.)(1999). 간호진단과 계획. 서울: 서울대학교출판부.
  9. 서울대학교병원 간호부(2007). 표준간호진술문을 적용한 임상간호과정. 서울: 현문사.
  10. 송경자(2007). 간호기록을 이용한 중환자실 간호업무 조사연구. 대한간호학회지, 37(6), 883-890.
  11. 이미숙(2004). ICNP를 이용한 중환자 간호기록 분석. 경북대학교석사학위논문, 대구.
  12. 이인실(2007). 전자간호기록 도입 전후 개심술 환자의 간호기록 비교 분석. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  13. 이향련, 최철자, 박오장, 김영숙, 최경옥, 김금순 등(2007). 성인간호학 I (제6판). 서울: 수문사.
  14. 최완희(2007). 전자간호기록 적용 전, 후 복식자궁절제술 환자의간호기록 비교. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  15. 하미숙(2007). 전자간호기록시스템 도입 전, 후 중환자실 간호기록 분석. 계명대학교 석사학위논문, 대구.
  16. Carpenito-Moyet, L. J. (2004). Nursing diagnosis: Application to clinical practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
  17. Laing, K. (2002). The benefits and challenges of the computerized electronic medical record. Gastroenterology Nursing, 25(2), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001610-200203000-00002
  18. Larrabee, J. H., Boldreghini, S., Elder-Sorrells, K., Turner, Z. M., Wender, R. G., Hart, J. M., et al. (2001). Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Computers in Nursing, 19(2), 56–65.
  19. Nahm, R., & Poston, I. (2000). Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Computers in Nursing, 18(5), 220–229.
  20. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) (2001). Nursing diagnosis: Definition & classification 2001-2002. Philadelphia, PA: Author.
  21. Park, I. S., Woo, K. S., Joo Y. H., Shin, H. J., Choi, W. H., Kim, Y. A., et al. (2006, November). Analysis of nursing records of kidney transplantation patients based on electronic nursing record. Poster session presented at Congress of Korean Society of Medical Informatics, Seoul, Korea.
  22. Saba, V. K. (2004). Clinical care classification system. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www. sabacare.com
  23. Simpson, R. L. (1991). Adopting a nursing minimum data set. Nursing Management, 22(2), 20-21.
  24. Smith, K., Smith, V., Krugman, M., & Oman, K. (2005). Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23(3), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200505000-00008
  25. Thede, L. Q. (2003). Informatics and nursing: Opportunities & challenges (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  26. Yu, O. S., Park, I. S., Joo, Y. H., Woo, K. S., Shin, H. J., Ahn, T. S., et al. (2006, June). Classification of nursing statements based on the ICNP, the HHCC, and the nursing process for use in electronic nursing records. Paper presented at 9th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, Seoul, Korea.