Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke by Measurements of Motor Evoked Potentials

운동 유발전위 측정을 통한 급성 뇌경색 환자의 임상 결과에 대한 예측

  • Seo, Yeong-Bae (Department of Neurology, Gachon University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Kang (Department of Rehabilitation, Gachon University Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Jin (Department of Neurology, Gachon University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Yeong-Bae (Department of Neurology, Gachon University Hospital)
  • 서영배 (가천의과학대학교 길병원 신경과학교실) ;
  • 이주강 (가천의과학대학교 길병원 재활의학과교실) ;
  • 신동진 (가천의과학대학교 길병원 신경과학교실) ;
  • 이영배 (가천의과학대학교 길병원 신경과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

Objective : The integrity of the motor pathways can be assessed objectively and quantitatively by measuring the motor evoked potentials (MEPs). However, the early prognostic application of MEPs for assessing the motor and functional recovery of patients with acute ischemic stoke has yielded contradictory results. Therefore, we assessed the value of MEPs for predicting the clinical outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods : Thirty three stroke patients with different degrees of hemiparesis were enrolled in this study. The stroke severity and outcome were assessed using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at admission and at 3 months. The MEPs were measured at the adductor pollicis brevis and adductor hallucis muscles and the relationships between the NIHSS, the mRS and the MEP findings were analysed. Results : In the acute phase of stroke, the presence of MEPs in the upper or lower extremities was correlated with a better clinical outcome (NIHSS: $9.12{\pm}5.86$->$2.81{\pm}1.47$, mRS: $2.81{\pm}1.47$->$1.62{\pm}1.31$) than the absence of an MEP in at least one extremity (NIHSS: $11.47{\pm}5.53$->$8.88{\pm}6.02$, mRS: $3.70{\pm}1.31$->$2.94{\pm}1.67$. Especially, there was significant clinical improvement after 3 months in the large territorial infarction patients according to the presence of MEPs. The sensitivity of the presence of MEPs for predicting clinical improvement (motor grade${\geq}$III) was 71.4%, while the specificity was 72.7% in severe hemiplegic patients (motor grade

Keywords