Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research (임상간호연구)

Hospital Nurses Association (병원간호사회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons of Maternal Perceptions between Rooming-in and Non Rooming-in Postpartum Women

신생아간호 운영체계에 대한 산모의 인식과 이용에 따른 차이

  • Kim, Yun Mi (Department of Nursing, Eulji University) ;
  • Park, Kwang Ok (Children's Hospital Nursing Team, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Jang, Hae Ryung (Nursing Department, Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center) ;
  • Jung, Eun Ja (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ji Soo (Department of Nursing, Sangji University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Young (Department of Nursing, Dong-A University)
  • 김윤미 (을지대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 박광옥 (서울아산병원 소아청소년병원 간호부) ;
  • 장혜령 (제일병원 간호부) ;
  • 정은자 (분당서울대학교병원 간호팀) ;
  • 김지수 (상지대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 김은영 (동아대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2009.05.14
  • Accepted : 2009.06.22
  • Published : 2009.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare maternal perceptions between two groups of postpartum women, women who chose to have their babies room-in and women who did not (non rooming-in group). Methods: Data collection was conducted in 37 hospitals from August 10 to September 20, 2008. The participants were 209 mothers opting for rooming-in and 128 mothers for non rooming-in. The women completed a questionnaire which included the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale, maternal attachment inventory, and postpartum self-evaluation questionnaire. Results: There were significant differences in education level, income and antenatal education between the rooming-in and non rooming-in groups. The rooming-in group also showed higher levels of satisfaction with medical services. More important, the rate of breast feeding for the rooming-in group was higher than for the non rooming-in group. There was no difference between the two groups for postpartum depression, maternal attachment and mothers' confidence with infant care tasks. Conclusion: These findings suggest that rooming-in system has more advantages compared to non rooming-in and that it can help to promote breast feeding. The authors recommend that the rooming-in system be expanded nationwide. The results of this research can be used to assist the development of future rooming-in system expansion strategy.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 병원간호사회

References

  1. 김은숙, 박영숙(2001). 모자동실이 초산모의 여아에 대한 태도와 돌보기 자신감에 미치는 영향. 여성건강간호학회지, 7(3), 256-270.
  2. 박문희(1995). 한국과 미국 초산모의 신생아에 대한 지각 비교. 대한간호학회지, 25(3), 431-439.
  3. 병원간호사회(2008). 신생아간호 운영체계와 개선방안 연구 (2008년 용역연구보고서). 서울: 저자.
  4. 송주은(2001). 모자동실군과 모자별실군 질식분만 산모의 피로도 비교. 대한건강간호학회지, 7(3), 241-255.
  5. 송주은, 이미경, 장순복(2002). 임부태아애착정도와 산후 모자동실의 선택. 대한간호학회지, 32(4), 529-538.
  6. 신계영, 김오진, 박주현, 이정림(2002). 모자동실과 모자별실에 따른 모유수유 실천 및 모성정체감 비교 연구. 여성건강간호학회지, 8(3), 402-411.
  7. 안영미, 김미란(2005). 신생아 중환자실에서의 초기 모아상호노출과 모아애착, 모성자존감 및 산후우울간의 관계분석. 대한간호학회지, 35(5), 798-809.
  8. 이상일, 최혜미(2002). 영유아 영양. 서울: 교문사.
  9. 이영은(1991). 산욕초기 초산모의 간호목표달성방법 합의가 어머니 역할수행에 대한 자신감 및 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 실험적 연구. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문, 서울.
  10. 한규은(2001). 모성 자존감 및 모성 민감성과 모아 애착과의 관계. 한양대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  11. 황문숙(1997). 모자동실이 모성역할과 모유수유에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 서울.
  12. Ainsworth, M. D. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. The American Psychologist, 44(4), 709-716. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.709
  13. Bystrova, K., Widström, A. M., Matthiesen, A. S., Ransj-Arvidson, A. B., Welles-Nyström, B., Vorontsov, I., et al. (2007). Early lactation performance in primiparous and multiparous women in relation to different maternity home practices: A randomized trial in St. Petersburg. International Breastfeeding Journal, 2(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-2-1
  14. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782-786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
  15. Crenshaw, J. (2007). Care Practice #6: No separation of mother and baby, with unlimited opportunities for breast feeding. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812407X217147
  16. Cuttini, M., Santo, M. D., Kaldor, K., Pavan, C., & Tonchella, C. (1995). Rooming-in, breastfeeding and mothers' satisfaction in an Italian nursery. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839508403230
  17. Lederman, R. P., Weingarten, C. G., & Loderman, E. (1981). Postpartum self-evaluation questionnaire: Measures of maternal adaptation. Birth Defects Original Article Series, 17(6), 201-231.
  18. Levitt, C. A., Kaczorowski, J., Hanvey, L., Avard, D., & Chance, G. W. (1996). Breast-feeding policies and practices in Canadian hospitals providing maternity care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 155(2), 181-188.
  19. Moore, E. R., & Anderson, G. C. (2007). Randomized controlled trial of very early mother-infant skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding status. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 52(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.12.002
  20. Müller, M. E. (1994). A questionnaire to measure mother to infant attachment. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2(2), 129-141.
  21. Nelson, E. A., Taylor, B. J., Jenik, A., Vance, J., Walmsley, K., Pollard, K., et al. (2001). International child care practices study: Infant sleeping environment. Early Human Development, 62(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(01)00116-5
  22. Porter, R. H. (2004). The biological significance of skin-to-skin contact and maternal odours. Acta Paediatrica, 93(12), 1560-1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035250410024835
  23. Rice, P. L. (2000). Rooming-in and cultural practices: Choice or constraint? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830050001654
  24. Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1998). Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 819-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00056-0
  25. World Health Organization(1998). Evidence for the 10 steps to successful breastfeeding (Rev. ed., WHO/CHD/98.9). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.