Development of New Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Seismic Coefficients of Korea Part II: Derivation of Probabilistic Site Coefficients

신(新) 확률론적 지진분석 및 지진계수 개발 Part II: 확률론적 지진계수 도출

  • Received : 2009.07.14
  • Accepted : 2009.10.27
  • Published : 2009.12.01

Abstract

In Korea, the probabilistically developed seismic hazard maps are used with deterministically derived seismic site coefficients in developing the design response spectrum of a specific site. Even though the seismic hazard maps and seismic site coefficients are incompatible, the current design code ignores such incompatibility. If the seismic hazard map and seismic coefficients are both developed in identical probabilistic framework, such problems can be solved. Unfortunately, the available method cannot be use to derive "true" probabilistic site coefficients. This study uses the ground motion time histories, which were developed as the result of a new probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in the companion paper, as input motions in performing one-dimensional equivalent linear site response analyses, from which the uniform hazard response spectra are generated. Another important characteristic of the hazard response spectra are that the uncertainties and randomness of the ground properties are accounted for. The uniform hazard spectra are then used to derive probabilistic site coefficients. Comparison of probabilistic and deterministically site coefficients demonstrate that there is a distinct discrepancy between two coefficients.

국내에서는 지반의 설계응답스펙럼을 확률론적으로 생성한 지진재해도와 결정론적으로 유도된 지진계수를적용하여 생성한다. 지진재해도와 지진계수는 호환되지 않지만, 현 설계기준은 이런 근본적인 비호환성을 무시하고 있다. 지진재해도와 지진계수를 동일한 확률론적 기반에서 생성한다면 이와 같은 문제를 극복할 수 있지만, 기존의 방법으로는 지진계수를 확률론적으로 생성할 수 없다. 본 논문에서는 동반논문에서 신(新) PSHA의 결과물로써 생성된 지진기록을 입력지진파로 활용하여 1차원 등가선형 지반응답 해석을 수행하였으며 이의 결과를 기반으로 등재해스펙트럼을 생성하였다. 등재해스펙트럼의 또 한가지 장점은 지반물성치의 불확실성과 임의성이 과학적으로 고려되었다는 점이다. 등재해스펙트럼은 나아가 확률론적인 지진계수를 도출하는데 활용되었다. 확률론적인 지진계수를 내진설계기준에서 제시된 지진계수를 비교한 결과, 확률론적으로 계산된 지진계수는 결정론적으로 계산된 결과와 상당한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 신 확률론적 지진재해분석기법과 부지효과 모듈을 융합하는 온라인 통합 플랫폼 개발

Supported by : 한국과학재단

References

  1. 건설교통부 (1997), 내진설계기준연구(II), p. 493.
  2. 김동수, 추연욱 (2001), 공진주시험을 이용한 국내 비점성토 지반의 동적변형특성, 한국지반공학회논문집, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 115-128.
  3. Borcherdt, R.D. (1994), Estimates of Site-dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification), Earthquake spectra, Vol. 10, pp. 617-653. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585791
  4. Dobry, R. and Vucetic, M. (1987), Dynamic Properties and Seismic Response of Soft Clay Deposits, International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils, Mexico City Vol. 2, pp. 51-87.
  5. Lee, H.S., Yun, S.U., Park, D. and Kim, I.T. (2008), Estimation of Nonlinear Site Effects of Soil Profiles in Korea, Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 13-23.
  6. Park, D. (2003), Estimation of Non-linear Seismic Site Effects for Deep Deposits of the Mississippi Embayment, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Urbana, p. 311.
  7. Park, D. and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2005), Evaluation of Seismic Site Factors in the Mississippi Embayment. II. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis with Nonlinear Site Effects, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.003
  8. Schnabel, P.B. (1973), Effects of Local Geology and Distance from Source on Earthquake Ground Motions, University of California, Berkeley, p. 280.
  9. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1970), Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses, College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, p. 41.
  10. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M. and Tokmatsu, K. (1986), Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 11, pp. 1016-1032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016)
  11. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R. and Seed, H.B. (1988), Dynamic Moduli and Damping Ratios for Cohesive Soils, Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, p. 48.