Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (한국간담췌외과학회지)

The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (한국간담췌외과학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Two-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

4공을 이용한 담낭 절제술과 2공을 이용한 담낭 절제술의 비교

  • Kim, Say-June (Department of Surgery, Deajeon St. Mary' Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Chul (Department of Surgery, Deajeon St. Mary' Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kwan-Ju (Department of Surgery, Deajeon St. Mary' Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 김세준 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 대전성모병원 외과학교실) ;
  • 이상철 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 대전성모병원 외과학교실) ;
  • 이관주 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 대전성모병원 외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: In spite of its safety and fesibility, it is not completely certain whether two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be applied for the same indications as four-port cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of the patients who had undergone either two-port or four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital between March 2007 and August 2009. A total of 341 patients were included. For our two-port cholecystectomy, combining a transumbilical wound retractor with a surgical glove on which there was a 11 mm trocar and two pipes were attached comprised an umbilical common channel, and another port was inserted through the epigastrium. The overall procedure was similar to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: The patients were classified into the four-port group (n=261) and the two-port group (n=80) according to the operative method. All the two-port cholecystectomies were followed by four-port procedures. The operative indications for these two procedures were identical. No significant difference was observed for the mean operation time, the conversion rate, the postoperative hospital stay and the complications between each group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors making two-port surgery longer than the 75 percentile of the overall operation time were the development of intraoperative complications (RR 14.3; p=0.005; C.I. 2.255-90.853), a operation for the patients who visited the emergency room (RR 10.4; p=0.012; C.I. 1.684-63.798), open conversion or making additional port(s) (RR 9.9; p=0.032; C.I. 1.219-80.958) and a body-mass index greater than 25 (RR 5.5; p=0.025; C.I. 1.244-24.731). Conclusion: This study documents that our two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to have the potential to replace the conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Sun S, Yang K, Gao M, He X, Tian J, Ma B. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Surg 2009;33:1904-1908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0108-1
  2. Leggett PL, Bissell CD, Churchman-Winn R, Ahn C. Threeport microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients. Surg Endosc 2001;15:293-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000302
  3. Tagaya N, Kita J, Takagi K, et al. Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998;5:309-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340050051
  4. Leung KF, Lee KW, Cheung TY, Leung LC, Lau KW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: two-port technique. Endoscopy 1996;28:505-507. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005531
  5. Laws HL. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizing two ports. Surg Endosc 1996;10:857-858. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189552
  6. Kagaya T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the "Twin-Port" system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001; 8:76-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340170053
  7. Ramachandran CS, Arora V. Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an innovative new method for gallbladder removal. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998;8:303-308. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1998.8.303
  8. Poon CM, Chan KW, Ko CW, et al. Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002;12:259-262. https://doi.org/10.1089/109264202760268032
  9. Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A, Rao PP. The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford) 2008;10:336-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820802276622
  10. Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 2009;75:681-686.
  11. Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG. Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc. Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:219-222. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0275
  12. Hong TH, You YK, Lee KH. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: scarless cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1393-1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0252-y
  13. Traverso LW. Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1976;132:81-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90295-6
  14. Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:32-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900006
  15. Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 2003;90:1345- 1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4315
  16. Ferzli GS, Fingerhut A. Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.010
  17. de Visser H, Heijnsdijk EA, Herder JL, Pistecky PV. Forces and displacements in colon surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16: 1426-1430.
  18. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, et al. Two-port versus fourport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17: 1624-1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9
  19. Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 2005;11:30-35.