DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Purchasing Avoidance of Digital Convergence Products: Focusing on the Customer's Psychological Factors and the Innovation Resistance

디지털 컨버전스제품 구매회피에 관한 연구: 소비자의 심리적 요인과 혁신저항을 중심으로

  • Published : 2009.01.28

Abstract

There is a big attention to digital convergence products(DCP) nowadays. However, consumers' response on the DCP is not always positive. These products may not match consumers' value and consumers may not know how to use them, because the DCP is generally innovative products. DCP marketers should learn that why consumers do not purchase them. Thus, this paper examines and identifies the consumers' purchase-avoiding psychological factors and antecedents on DCP. In detail, It is empirically checked that how the relationship between purchase-preventing factors such as complexity, incongruence, uncertainty, and unreasonability and purchase-avoiding psychological factors such as dissonance, innovation resistence, and perceived loss is. Also, these purchase-avoiding psychological factors' influence on the purchase-intention is empirically checked. As results, complexity and incongruence have an effect on the innovation resistence significantly. Uncertainty and unreasonability influence perceived loss variable. Unreasonability also influences consumers' cognitive dissonance variable. Additionally, cognitive dissonance have an influence on innovation resistence positively, and such innovation resistence influence consumer's purchase-intention negatively. Therefore, marketers should think twice about the roles of these purchase-preventing factors before launching.

디지털의 주요한 특성인 융합성으로 인해 IT산업분야에서 디지털 컨버전스 제품은 시장에서 큰 주목을 받고 있는 것이 사실이다. 그러나 디지털 컨버전스 제품에 대한 소비자들의 반응이 항상 긍정적이지만은 않다. 디지털 컨버전스 제품이 혁신제품이기에 소비자들의 가치와 부합하지 않거나 복잡한 이용방법에 따른 문제점이 들어나기도 한다. 즉, 디지털 컨버전스 제품이 보다 더 소비자들에게 긍정적인 반응을 얻어 시장을 확대해 나가기 위해서는 디지털 컨버전스 제품에 대한 소비자들의 구매회피 요인이 무엇인지 규명하고 어떠한 불편한 심리를 가지게 되는지 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 구체적으로 본 연구에서는 선행연구들을 토대로 복잡성, 부적합성, 불확실성, 비용의 비합리성과 같은 구매를 저해하는 요인을 확인하고 이러한 요인들이 부조화, 혁신저항, 지각된 손실과 같은 부정적인 심리적 요인을 형성하게 하여 구매회피로 이어지는 것으로 해석하고 있다. 연구의 결과, 복잡성과 부적합성은 혁신저항을 느끼게 만드는 요소이며, 불확실성과 비합리성은 지각된 손실에 영향을 미치며, 비합리성은 부조화에 유의한 영향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 부조화는 혁신저항에 영향을 미치고 이러한 혁신저항은 구매의도에 유의하게 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로, 디지털 컨버전스 제품이 시장에 쉽게 확산되어 나가기 위해서는 복잡성, 부적합성, 불확실성, 비합리성과 같은 요소들에 대해 마케터들이 충분히 숙고한 후에 이러한 요소들을 제거할 수 있는 방안을 마련하고 출시되어야 할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김해룡, 홍신명, 이문규, "컨버전스 제품에 대한 소비자 평가", 한국마케팅저널, 제7권, 제1호, pp.1-20, 2005.
  2. 신영미, 이승창, 이호근, "무선인터넷 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 시스템 특성, 사용자 인지, 그리고 사용", 경영학연구, 제33권, 제5호, pp.1283-1310, 2004.
  3. 오장균, "소비자기대와 채택지연행동", 산업경영연구, 제7권, pp.224-240, 1995.
  4. 유필화, 이승희, "신제품수용시 소비자의 혁신저항에 관한 연구 - 혁신저항모형을 중심으로-", 경영학연구, 제23권, 제3호, pp.217-250, 1994.
  5. 이명렬, "소비자행동에 있어서 인지불협화에 관한 연구", 서울대학교 대학원 경영학과 석사학위논문, 1986.
  6. D. A. Aaker and L. K. Kevin, "Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions," Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, pp.27-41, 1990(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252171
  7. J. C. Alba and W. Hutchinson, "Dimensions of consumer expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, pp.411-454, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1086/209080
  8. F. M. Bass, "The Relationship between Diffusion Rates, Experience Curves, and Demand Elasticities for Consumer Durable Technological Innovations," Journal of Business, pp.51-67, 1980(7)
  9. G. G. Bell, "The Automobile Buyer After the Purchase," Journal of Marketing, Vol.31, pp.12-16, 1967.
  10. W. G. Biemans, Managing Innovation within Networks, Routledge, London, 1992.
  11. A. Dhebar, "Speeding High-Tech Producers, Meet the Balking Consumer," Solan Management Review, Vol.37, pp.37-54, 1996.
  12. H. Einhorn and R. Hogarth, "Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference," Psychological Review, Vol.92, pp.433-459, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.433
  13. L. Festinger, The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford California: Stanford University Press, 1957.
  14. E. C. Gabarino and J. A. Edell, "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24, No.2, pp.147-158, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1086/209500
  15. H. Gatignon and T. Robertson, "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.11, No.1, pp.849-867, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1086/209021
  16. H. Gatignon and T. Robertson, "Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects," Journal of Marketing, Vol.53, No.1, pp.35-49, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251523
  17. J. T. Gourville, "Eager Sellers and Stony Buyers: Understanding the Psychology of New-Product Adoption," Harvard Business review, Vol.1, 2006(6).
  18. S. Gurevitz, "Technology Will Shorten Product Life Cycles," Business Marketing, Vol.68, No.10, pp.12-13, 1983.
  19. E. C. Hirschman, "Religious Affiliation Consumption Processes: An Initial Paradigm," forthcoming in Research in Marketing, 1982.
  20. R. M. Hogarth, Judgement and choice: The psychology of Decision, New York: John Wiley&Sons, 1980.
  21. S. Holak, D. R. Lehmann, and F. Sultan, "The Role of Expectations in the Adoption of Innovative Consumer Durabies: Some Preliminary Evidence," Journal of Retailing, Vol.63, pp.243-259, 1987.
  22. D. Horsky, "A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits Price, Income and Information," Marketing Science, Vol.9, pp.342-365, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.4.342
  23. B. E. Kahn and K. S. Rakesh, "Modeling Ambiguity in Decision under Uncertainty," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, pp.265-272, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1086/209163
  24. L. B. Kaplan, G. J. Szybillo, and J. Jacoby, "Components of Perceived Rosk in Product Purchase; A Cross Validation," Journal of Applied Psychilogy, Vol.54, No.3, pp.287-291, 1974.
  25. D. G. Mick and F. Susan, "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cog-nizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, pp.123-143, 1998(9). https://doi.org/10.1086/209531
  26. W. L. Moore and D. R. Lehmann, "Individual Differences in Search Behavior for a Non Durable," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.7, pp.296-307, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1086/208817
  27. R. G. Netemeyer, J. S. Boles, and R. M. McMurrian, "An Investigation into The Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in a Personal Selling Context," Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, No.3, pp.85-98, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251791
  28. S. Oshikawa, "The Measurement of Cognitive Dissonance: Some Findings," Journal of Marketing, Vol.36, No.1, pp.64-67, 1972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250871
  29. L. E. Ostlund, "Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.1, No.2, pp.23-29, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1086/208587
  30. S. Ram, "A Model of Innovation Resistance," in Melanie Wallendorf and Paul Anderson(eds.), Advances in Customer Research, Vol.14, Provo. UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp.208-212, 1987.
  31. M. D. Reilly and H. N. Conover, "Meta-analysis: integrating results from consumer research studies," in Bagozzi, R.P., Tybout, A.M. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, Vol.10 pp.509-13, 1983.
  32. B. Rick, "Managing the 'S' Curves of Innovation," Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.1(Winter), pp.61-72, 1992.
  33. E. M. Rogers and F. F. Shoemaker, Communication of innovations, (2nd ed.), New York: Free Press, 1971.
  34. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed., The Free Press, New York NY, 1983.
  35. L. G. Schiffman and L. L. Kanuk, Consumer Behavior, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
  36. J. N. Sheth, "Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept(LDC) in Diffusion Research," in Research in Marketing ed., J. N. Sheth, Vol.4, Jai Press Inc., pp.273-282, 1981.
  37. L. J. Solomon and E. D. Rothblum, "Academic Procrastination; Frequency and Cognitive Behavioral Correlates," Journal of Counseling psychology, Vol.31, pp.503-509, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503
  38. L. G. Tornatzky and K. J. Klein, "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption- Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.29, No.1, pp.28-45, 1982.
  39. E. Van Dijk and M. Zeelenberg, "The Discounting of Ambiguous Information in Economic Decision Making," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol.16, pp.341-352, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.450
  40. G. Zaltman, R. Duncan, and J. Holbeck, Innovation and Organization, NY: John Wiley & Son, 1973.
  41. G. Zaltman and M. Wallendorf, Consumer Behavior: Basic Findings and Management Implications, NY: John Wiley & Son, 1983.
  42. http://www.harvard.edu/

Cited by

  1. Analyzing Impact Factors of User Resistance to Accepting Paid Mobile Application vol.13, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.04.361
  2. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Convergence Products' Utility vol.14, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.9.4270
  3. Factors Influencing Internet Consumer's Purchase Delay Behaviors : Focusing on Situational Factors and Perceived Uncertainty vol.14, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.07.407
  4. Effects of Innovation Characteristics and User Characteristics on the Adopting e-Books : Focused on Innovation Resistance Model vol.14, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.061