References
- Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
- Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
- Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:22-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90112-0
- Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant sys-tem with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-8
- Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on B°ranemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7
- Richter EJ. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:602-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90285-0
- Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
- Van Rossen IP, Braak LH, de Putter C, de Groot K. Stressabsorbing elements in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:198-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90179-G
- Van Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:51-7
- Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
- McCartney JW. Cantilever rests: an alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:817-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90209-S
- Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:188-98
- Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:355-66
- Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. 'All-on-Four' immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:2-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x
- Cho C, Shin SW, Kwon JJ. Three dimensional finite element analysis on the mandibular cantilevered prosthesis supported by implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:724-43
- Jang BS, Kim CW, Kim YS. A three dimensional finite element stress analysis of osseointegrated prosthesis according to the location and length of cantilever. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1996;34:501-32
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
- De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. FFunctional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90042-2
- Ericsson I, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Glantz PO, Nyman S.A clinical evaluation of fixed-bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:307-12 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x
- Mathews MF, Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA. The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:822-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80021-6
- Van Steenberghe D. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:217-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8
- Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
- Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-8
- Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res 1982;61:25-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610010501
- Davis DM, Zarb GA, Chao YL. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 1. The effect of varying the number of supporting abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:197-201
- Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
- Kim DW, Kim YS. A study on the osseointegrated prostesis using three dimensional finite element method. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1991;29:167-213
- Lee DO, Chung CH, Cho KZ. A study on the three dimensional finite element analysis of the stresses according to the curvature of arch and placement of implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1995;33:98-129
- Khatami AH, Smith CR. 'All-on-Four' immediate function concept and clinical report of treatment of an edentulous mandible with a fixed complete denture and milled titanium framework. J Prosthodont 2008;17:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00246.x
- Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, Romeo D, Taschieri S, Fabbro MD. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:255-63 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00090.x
- Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:227-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01472.x
- Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:S88-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00080.x
- White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:493-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90189-9
- Lim JK. Accuracy estimation and control methods of finite element solutions. Trans KSME 1994;34:502-9
- Byun SK, Park WH, Lee YS. Three dimensional finite element stress analysis of five different taper design implant systems J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:584-93
- Bergman B. Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:114-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90176-2
- Misch CM, Ismail YH. Finite element stress analysis of tooth-to-implant fixed partial denture designs. J Prosthodont 1993;2:83-92 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00388.x
- Haraldson T, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:200-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00554.x
- Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333-40
- Sertgoz A. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implantsupported fixed prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:19-27
- Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90238-8
- Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:223-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90379-X
- Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-8
- Davis DM, Rimrott R, Zarb GA. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:275-80
- Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Radin EL. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 1985;18:189-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(85)90204-0
- Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:211-7
- Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:59-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90109-6
- Brunski JB, Moccia AF Jr, Pollack SR, Korostoff E, Trachtenberg DI. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects. J Dent Res 1979;58:1953-69 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580100201
Cited by
- Finite element modeling technique for predicting mechanical behaviors on mandible bone during mastication vol.4, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.218
- Finite element analysis on the connection types of abutment and fixture vol.50, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.2.119