Blast Reaction of Korean Rice Cultivars against Korean and Philippines Isolates

국내 주요 벼 품종의 한국과 필리핀 도열병 균주에 대한 저항성 평가

  • Roh, Jae-Hwan (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Young-Chan (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Oh, In-Seok (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Yeon-Gyu (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Han, Seong-Sook (National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Vera Cruz, C. (International Rice Research Institute) ;
  • Leung, H. (International Rice Research Institute)
  • Received : 2008.12.04
  • Published : 20081200

Abstract

Blast resistance of one hundred and thirty-one rice cultivars bred in Korea was tested with thirty Korean isolates and twenty-two Philippines isolates using three screening methods. In the blast nursery conducted in Korea and in the Philippines, average disease index of rice cultivars were 4.6 and 2.2, respectively. Seventy-nine cultivars showed different resistance reaction in Korea and in the Philippines, and 19 cultivars showed the same resistant reaction in two locations. In the seedling test, Korean blast isolates displayed different levels of virulence. 93-093, a Korean isolate, was compatible with 90 cultivars whereas 97-057 showed a compatible reaction with 13 cultivars. Twenty-three cultivars showed high level of resistance against Korean and Philippines isolates but Chucheongbyeo, Heugnambyeo, and Manmibyeo showed susceptible reaction to all blast isolates. Through the sequential planting test in Korea and in the Philippines, Palgongbyeo and Seomjinbyeo displayed durable resistance, and Nagdongbyeo and Gihobyeo showed high level of disease infection over the planting time. These results indicate that blast isolates collected in two countries have different genetic background and number of compatible isolates should be considered in definition the durability of rice cultivar to rice blast.

한국에서 육성한 131개 벼 품종을 이용하여 한국과 필리핀 도열병 균주에 대한 저항성 양상을 조사하여 벼 도열병 저항성 육종연구를 위한 기초자료를 얻고자 본 시험을 수행하였다. 1. 한국과 필리핀에서 밭못자리 검정을 실시한 결과, 전체 품종의 평균 잎도열병 발병정도는 한국에서 4.6으로 필리핀에서 2.0보다 2배 이상 높게 나타났으며, 시험품종 가운데 양국에서 저항성 반응이 서로 다르게 나타난 품종의 비율이 60.3%로 나타났다. 2. 양국에서 수집된 도열병 균주를 이용한 유묘접종검정 결과, 한국 수집 도열병 균주들이 필리핀 수집 균주들보다 병원성이 강한 것으로 나타났는데, 시험품종을 침해하는 비율이 가장 높았던 균주는 한국 균주에서는 93-093, 필리핀 균주에서는 92329-9이었으며, 각각 68.7%와 47.3%의 품종 침해비율을 나타내었다. 3. 도열병 저항성 반응이 다른 9개 품종을 이용한 내구저항성 평가 결과, 팔공벼, 섬진벼, 태백벼, 삼강벼, 밀양23호 등 5품종은 한국 및 필리핀 균주를 이용한 연계검정에서 공히 낮은 병반면적율을 나타내어 내구저항성 품종으로 구분되었다. 4. 한국 연계검정에서 내구성이 낮았던 일품벼와 기호벼는 필리핀 균주를 이용한 연계검정에서 일품벼는 내구저항성이 높은 것으로 나타났고, 기호벼는 3차 파종부터 병반면적율이 급격히 증가하는 경향을 나타내어, 품종의 내구저항성 평가는 환경에 존재하는 친환성 균주수와 균주와 품종간 친화성 정도가 병의 진전 및 확산에 함께 관여하는 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국제미작연구소

References

  1. Ahn, S.W. 1994. International collaboration on breeding for resistance to rice blast in Rice blast disease pp:137. 1994 IRRI
  2. Bonman JM, Vergel De Dios TI, and Khin MM 1986. Physiologic specialization of Pyricularia oryzae in the Philippines. Plant disease/August:767-769
  3. Cho YC, Choi IS, Baek MK, Suh JP, Hong HC, Kim YG, Koizumi S, Jena KK, Choi HC, Hwang HG 2003. Resistant genes and their effects to rice blast in isogenic lines of genetic background of Chucheongbyeo and Suweon345. Rice Genetics News 20:101-105
  4. Crill P and Khush GS 1979. Techniques and procedure for effective and stable control of rice blast with monogenic resistance. Lecture meeting in rice blast disease, ASPAC/ FFTC and ORD, Suweon, Korea, 349-368
  5. Goto KT, Narita H, Ichigawa I, Nakanishi Y, Kumamoto, Fujikawa T 1961. Joint work on the race of rice blast fungus, Pyricularia oryzae (Fascicle I). Agr. For. Fish. Res. Com. Ministry Agri. Por., Tokyo, pp.1-89
  6. Han SS, Ra DS, Kim CK 1995. Incidence of panicle blast, distribution of race and pathogenicity of new races of Pyricularia grisea during 1993-2004. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 11(3):238-244
  7. Hwang HG, Kwon SJ, Cho YC, Ahn SN, Suh JP, Moon HP 2004. Genetic diversity of high-quality rice cultivars based on SSR markers linked to blast resistance genes. Korean J. Crop Sci. 49:251-255
  8. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) 1988. Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 3rd ed. pp 14. Philippines
  9. Johnson, R. 1979. The concept of durable resistance. Phytopathology 69:198-199 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-69-198
  10. Kim BR, Roh JH, Choi SH, Ahn SW, and Han SS 2004. Durability of rice cultivars to blast in Korea by sequential planting method. Korean J. Breed. 36(5):350-356
  11. Kim CK, Ryu JD, Ra DS, and Lee EJ 1991. Blast reactions of high quality rice cultivars in Korea. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 7(2):61-64
  12. Lee EJ 1972. Epidemic outbreak of blast disease in the resistant variety of rice, "Kwanok". Kor. J. Plant Protection 11(1):41-43
  13. Nelson,R.R. 1978. Genetics of horizontal resistance to plant disease, Ann.Rev. Phytpathology. 16:359-378 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.002043
  14. Ou SH 1985. Rice Disease. 2nd ed. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK
  15. Roh JH, Cho YC, Kim YG, Oh IS, Lee JY, and Han SS 2007. Blast resistance of high quality rice cultivars. Korean J. Breed. 39(3):288-295
  16. Zeigler RS, Tohme J, Nelson J, Levy M, Correa F 1994. Linking blast population analysis to resistance breeding: A proposed strategy for durable resistance. In: Zeigler RS, Leong SA, Teng PS (eds), Rice Blast Disease, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 267-292