DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Support Vector Machine Classification Using Training Sets of Small Mixed Pixels: An Appropriateness Assessment of IKONOS Imagery

  • Yu, Byeong-Hyeok (Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, School of Science, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chi, Kwang-Hoon (Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, School of Science, University of Science and Technology)
  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

Many studies have generally used a large number of pure pixels as an approach to training set design. The training set are used, however, varies between classifiers. In the recent research, it was reported that small mixed pixels between classes are actually more useful than larger pure pixels of each class in Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. We evaluated a usability of small mixed pixels as a training set for the classification of high-resolution satellite imagery. We presented an advanced approach to obtain a mixed pixel readily, and evaluated the appropriateness with the land cover classification from IKONOS satellite imagery. The results showed that the accuracy of the classification based on small mixed pixels is nearly identical to the accuracy of the classification based on large pure pixels. However, it also showed a limitation that small mixed pixels used may provide insufficient information to separate the classes. Small mixed pixels of the class border region provide cost-effective training sets, but its use with other pixels must be considered in use of high-resolution satellite imagery or relatively complex land cover situations.

Keywords

References

  1. Arora, M. K. and G. M. Foody, 1997. Log-linear modeling for the evaluation of the variables affecting the accuracy of probabilistic, fuzzy and neural network classifications. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18: 785-798 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697218755
  2. Foody, G. M., M., M. B. McCulloch, and W. B. Yates, 1995. The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural network classification. International Journal of remote sensing, 16: 1707-1723 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954507
  3. Foody, G. M. and A. Mathur, 2004a. A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42:1335-1343 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.827257
  4. Giles M. Foody and Ajay Mathur, 2006. The use of small training sets containing mixed pixels for accurate hard image classification: Training on mixed spectral responses for classification by a SVM, Remote Sensing of Environment, 103: 179-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.001
  5. Giles M. Foody and Ajay Mathur, 2004b. Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: directing training data acquisition for SVM classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93: 107-117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.017
  6. Hammond, T. O. and D. L. Verbyla, 1996. Optimistic bias in classification accuracy assessment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 1261-1266 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949085
  7. Huang, C., L. S. Davis, and J. R. G. Townshend, 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification, International Journal of remote sensing, 23: 725-749 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110040323
  8. Mather, P. M., 2004. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images, 3rd edition, Chichester: Wiley
  9. Pal, M. and P. M. Mather, 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 554-565 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9
  10. Van Niel, T. G., T. R. McVicar, and B. Datt, 2005. On the relationship between training sample size and data dimensionality of broadband multi-temporal classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 98: 468-480 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.011
  11. Vapnik, F., 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, NewYork:Springer-Verlag
  12. Zhuang, X., B. A. Engel, D. F. Lozanogarcia, R. N. Fernandez, and C. J. Johannsen, 1994. Optimization of training data required for neuro-classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15: 3271-3277 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169408954326