International Journal of Quality Innovation

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Kaizen within Kaizen Teams: Continuous and Process Improvements in a Spanish municipality

  • Published : 2008.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A Purpose. As organizations become more team oriented, research on teams continues to increase especially involving how teams contribute to organizational performance and effectiveness. Although there has been existing research on Kaizen teams in the private sector, very little research has included Kaizen teams in the public sector. In this paper, we present a method to study Kaizen teams in a local Spanish government that have been using Kaizen teams for more than ten years. Design/methodology/approach. Quantitative research was adopted for this study. Twenty teams participated in the study by filling out the Team Learning and Development Inventory (TLI) proposed by Lingham (2004). In addition, we interviewed members of the teams in order to clarify and assure our quantitative results. Findings Based on the findings, we propose that Kaizen teams should practice both Continuous (CI) and Process Improvements (PI) in their projects. We also propose that Kaizen teams should not be teams skilled only at developing better improvement processes (both CI and PI) for the organization but that such teams should also be skilled at engaging in team development using both CI and PI processes internally-a Kaizen within Kaizen teams approach. Research limitations. Its based in one case study. However, it is working paper and the research project still is developing. Practical Implications (if possible). Serve as a guide to practitioners (Public managers) who desire to understand how their Kaizen teams involves both internal (conversational spaces) and external (methodology) perspectives that would contribute to both team and organizational effectiveness. In this paper, we focus on the Internal Processes (both CI and PI) using the TLI as an effective method for Kaizen teams to engage in the Kaizen process. Originality/value. This study is one of the first to look at team's performance using Team Learning and Development Inventory in Spain's public sector. It is also the first to mention about the relationship of the team's performance and the implementation of process improvement methodologies in Spain local government environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Asociacion de Relaciones Humanas del Japon.(1992), Kaizen Teian: Desarrollo de sisteama para la mejora continua a través de las propuestas de los empleados, Portland, OR: Productivity Press
  2. Baker, A. C., Jensen, P. J., and Kolb, D. A.(Eds.). (2002), Conversational learning: an experiential approach to knowledge creation, Westport CT, Quorum Books
  3. Bales, R. F.(1949), Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press
  4. Bales, R. F.(1979), SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups, New York: Free Press
  5. Berger, A.(1997), "Continuous improvement and Kaizen: Standardizations and organizational designs," Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 110-117 https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069710165792
  6. Bessant, J.(2003), High Involvement Innovation, Chichester West Success: John Wiley and Sons Ltd
  7. Bond, T. C.(1999), "The role of performance measurement in continuous improvement," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1318-1334 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910294291
  8. Brooks, A. K.(1994), "Power and the production of knowledge: Collective team learning in work organizations," Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 213-236 https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920050303
  9. Brown, J. and Issacs, D.(1996), "Conversation as a core business process," The Systems Thinker, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 1-6
  10. Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S., and Paulus, P. B.(1998), "Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming," Small Group Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 495-527 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498294005
  11. Brunet, A. P. and New, S.(2003), "Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 1426-1446 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310506704
  12. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., and Higgs, A. C.(1993), "Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, pp. 823-850 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
  13. Carpinetti, L., Buosi, T., et al.(2003), "Quality Management and improvement. A framework and a business-process reference model," Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 543-554 https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150310484553
  14. Chung, C. H.(1999), "It is the process: A philosophical foundation for quality management," Total Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 187-197 https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412997947
  15. Cohen, S. G. and Bailey, D. E.(1997), "What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite," Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 239-290 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
  16. Dahlgaard, J. J. and Dahlgaard-Park, S. M.(2006), "Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture," The TQM Magazine, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 263-281 https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610659998
  17. Daniels, R. and Burns, N. D.(1997), "A framework for proactive performance measurement system introduction," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 100-116 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710158014
  18. Davenport, T. H. and Short, J. E.(1990), "The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 11-27
  19. Davenport, T. H.(1993), Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press
  20. Druskat, V. U. and Wolf, S. B.(2001), "Building Emotional Intelligence of Groups," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 80-90
  21. Edmondson, A. C.(1996, August), Group-level differences in tolerance of face threat and consequences for team learning and performance, Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management
  22. Edmondson, A. C.(1999), "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 350-383 https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  23. Elbo, R. A. H.(2000), "Inside's Japan Kaizen Power Houses," Business World Philippines, Vol. 13, pp. 1-2
  24. Farley, C.(1999), "Despliegue de Políticas del KAIZEN," Proceedings XI Congreso Internacional de Calidad Total, Monterrey Nuevo León México, Fundación Mexicana de la Calidad Total y Centro de Productividad de Monterrey
  25. Gemmill, G. and Wynkoop, C.(1991), "The Psychodynamics of small group transformation," Small Group Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 4-23 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491221002
  26. Gersick, C. J. G.(1989), "Making time: predictable transitions in task groups," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 274-309 https://doi.org/10.2307/256363
  27. Gondhalekar, S., Babu, S., et al.(1995), "Towards using Kaizen process dynamics: a case study," International journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 192-209 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719510101286
  28. Gully, S. M., Devine, D. S., and Whitney, D. J.(1995), "A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence," Small Group Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 497-520 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495264003
  29. Hackman, R. J.(1987), "The design of work teams," In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 315-342, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  30. Hackman, R. J.(Ed.). (1990), Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Inc., Publishers
  31. Hackman, R. J.(2002), Leading Teams: Setting the stage for great performances, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
  32. Harrington, H. J.(1991), Business Process Improvement; The breakthrough strategy for Total Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness, New York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill
  33. Harrington, H. J.(1995), "Continuous versus breakthrough improvement: Finding the right answer," Business Process Re-engineering and Management Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 31-49
  34. Imai, M.(1986), Kaizen: The key to Japan's Competitive Success, New York, NY: Random House
  35. Imai, M.(1997), GEMBA KAIZEN. A common sense, low cost approach to management, Kaizen Institute, Ltd
  36. Juran, J.(1990), Juran y el Liderazgo para la Calidad. Un Manual para Directivos, Madrid: Editorial Díaz Santos
  37. Kasl, E., Marsick, V. J., and Dechant, K.(1997), "Teams as learners: A research-based model of team learning," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 227-247 https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886397332010
  38. Kelada, J. N.(1994), "Is reengineering replacing total quality?" Quality Progress Milwaukee, Vol. 27, No. 12, pp. 79-85
  39. Kolb, D. A.(1984), Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc
  40. Langfred, C. W.(1998), "Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword?" Small Group Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 124-144 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498291005
  41. Lewin, K.(1951), Field theory in social science, New York: Harper Torchbooks
  42. Lillrank, P. and Kano, N.(1989), Continuous Improvement: Quality Control Circles in Japanese industries, Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan
  43. Lingham, T.(2004), Developing a measure for conversational learning spaces in teams, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
  44. Lingham, T., Richley, B. A., and Royo, C.(2005a), "T-groups revisited: The significance of sensitivity training to managerial learning and development for the 21st century," Academy of Management Annual Conference, Managerial Education and Development Division, Honolulu, Hawaii
  45. Lingham, T. and Richley, B. A.(2005), "The Experience of organizational change: The significance of conversations across levels," Academy of Management Annual Conference, Organizational Development and Change Division, Honolulu, Hawaii
  46. Lingham, T., Serlavos, R., and Richley, B. A.(2005b), "Conversational spaces in teams: An exploratory cross-cultural study of American and Spanish MBA teams," ESADE Business School Working Paper Series, Vol. 196, Barcelona, Spain
  47. MacDonald, J.(1995), "Together TQM and BPR are winners," TQM Magazine, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 21-25
  48. Malloch, H.(1997), "Strategic and HRM aspects of kaizen: a case study," New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 108-122 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00028
  49. McGrath, J. E.(1991), "Time, interaction, and performance (TIP)," Small Group Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 147-175 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001
  50. Mintzberg, H. and Westley, F.(1992), "Cycles of organizational change," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 39-59 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130905
  51. Mizuno, S.(1988), Company Wide Quality Control, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization
  52. Monden, Y.(1998), Toyota Production System. An integrated approached to Just in Time, Norcross GA: Engineering and Management Press
  53. Newitt, D. J.(1996), "Beyond BPR and TQM-Managing through processes: Is kaizen enough?" Proceedings Industrial Engineering, London, U.K: Institution of Electric Engineers
  54. Pettigrew, A. M.(1990), "Longitudinal Field Research: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 267-292 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
  55. Robinson, A.(1991), Continuous Improvement in Operations, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press
  56. Salazar, A. J.(1995), "Understanding the synergistic effects of communication in small groups," Small Group Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 169-185 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495262002
  57. Sheridan, J.(1997), "Kaizen Blitz," Industry Week, Vol. 246, No. 16, pp. 19-27
  58. Short, J. E. and Venkatraman, N.(1992), "Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter's business network," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 7-21
  59. Steiner, I. D.(1972), Group process and productivity, New York: Academic Press
  60. Suarez-Barraza, M. F.(2007), El KAIZEN: La filosofía de Mejora Continua e Innovacion Incremental detras de la Administración por Calidad Total, Mexico, D.F., Panorama
  61. Suarez-Barraza, M. F. and Ramis-Pujol, J.(2005), "Continuous improvement under Alfred Schutz's approach of scientific interpretation and the common sense of human action," In: Palermo University and QMOD 2005 ed. Quality Management and Organizational Development, Palermo, Sicilia, Italia: QMOD, Vol. 2
  62. Tanner, C. and Roncarti, R.(1994), "Kaizen Leads to breakthroughs in responsiveness and the Shingo Prize at Critikon," National Productivity Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 517-531 https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040130406
  63. Thompson, L. and Fine, G. A.(1999), "Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration," Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 278-302 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1
  64. Tozawa, B. and Bodek, N.(1999), Quick and easy work improvement seminar basics, Tokyo: Nikon Kogyo Shimbun
  65. Tuckman, B. W.(1965), "Developmental sequence in small groups," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 384-399 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
  66. Van de Ven, A. H. and Poole, M. S.(1995), "Explaining Developments change in organizations," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 510-540 https://doi.org/10.2307/258786
  67. Wageman, R.(1995), "Interdependence and group effectiveness," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 145-180 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393703
  68. Walsh, P.(1996), "Finding Key performance drivers: Some new tools," Total Quality Management, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 509-519 https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129610612
  69. Wech, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Steel, R. P., and Bennet, N.(1998), "Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals' performance and organizational commitment?" Small Group Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 472-495 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498294004
  70. Wheelan, S. A.(1994), Group processes: A developmental perspective, Sydney: Allyn and Bacon
  71. Zander, A. F.(1982), Making groups effective, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.