Bioequivalence Test of Rebamipide 100 mg Tablets

레바미피드 100 mg 정제의 새울학적동등성

  • Kim, Se-Mi (College of Pharmacy, Institute of Bioequivalence and Bridging Study, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Hea-Young (Safety Pharmacology Division, Pharmacological Research Department, NITR, KFDA) ;
  • Kang, Hyun-Ah (Pharmaceutical Research Institute, CJ CheilJedang Corp.) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Bok (College of Pharmacy, Institute of Bioequivalence and Bridging Study, Chonnam National University)
  • 김세미 (전남대학교 약학대학 부속 생물학적동등성 및 가교시험연구소) ;
  • 조혜영 (국립독성과학원) ;
  • 강현아 (CJ제일제당주식회사 제약연구소) ;
  • 이용복 (전남대학교 약학대학 부속 생물학적동등성 및 가교시험연구소)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

Rebamipide, ($\pm$)-2-(4-chlorobenzoylamino)-3-[2(1H)-quinolinon-4-yl] propionic acid, is used for mucosal protection, healing of gastroduodenal ulcers, and treatment of gastritis. It works by enhancing mucosal defense, scavenging free radicals and temporarily activating genes encoding cyclooxygenase-2. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two rebamipide tablets, $Mucosta^{(R)}$ (Korea Otsuca Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.) and Mustar (Korean Drug Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The release of rebamipide from the two rebamipide formulations in vitro was tested using KP VIII Apparatus II method with pH 6.8 dissolution medium. Twenty six healthy male subjects, $23.46{\pm}2.63$ years in age and $66.62{\pm}8.97\;kg$ in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After a single tablet containing 100 mg as rebamipide was orally administered, blood samples were taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of rebamipide in serum were determined using HPLC with fluorescence detector. The dissolution profiles of two formulations were similar in the tested dissolution medium. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated, and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and untransformed $T_{max}$. The results showed that the differences between two formulations based on the reference drug, $Mucosta^{(R)}$ were -5.08, 3.52 and -9.71 % for $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (e.g., log 0.84$\sim$log 1.07 and log 0.90$\sim$log 1.17 for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). Thus, the criteria of the KFDA bioequivalence guideline were satisfied, indicating Mustar tablet was bioequivalent to $Mucosta^{(R)}$ tablet.

Keywords