Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE INFLUENCE OF CAVITY CONFIGURATION ON THE MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN COMPOSITE RESIN AND DENTIN

와동의 형태가 상아질과 복합레진 사이의 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Ye-Mi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Chan-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Song, Yoon-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Seo, Deok-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Roh, Byoung-Duck (Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
  • 김예미 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박정원 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 이찬영 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 송윤정 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 서덕규 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 노병덕 (연세대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the C-factor on the bond strength of a 6th generation self-etching system by measuring the microtensile bond strength of four types of restorations classified by different C-factors with an identical depth of dentin. Eighty human molars were divided into four experimental groups, each of which had a C-factor of 0.25, 2, 3 or 4. Each group was then further divided into four subgroups based on the adhesive and composite resin used. The adhesives used for this study were AQ Bond Plus (Sun Medical, Japan) and XenoIII (DENTSPLY, Germany). And composite resins used were fantasists (Sun Medical, Japan) and Ceram-X mono (DENTSPLY, Germany). The results were then analyzed using one-way ANOVA, a Tukey's test, and a Pearson's correlation test and were as follows. 1. There was no significant difference among C-factor groups with the exception of groups of Xeno III and Ceram-X mono (p<0.05). 2. There was no significant difference between any of the adhesives and composite resins in groups with C-factor 0.25, 2 and 4. 3. There was no correlation between the change in C-factor and microtensile bond strength in the Fantasista groups. It was concluded that the C-factor of cavities does not have a significant effect on the microtensile bond strength of the restorations when cavities of the same depth of dentin are restored using composite resin in conjunction with the 6th generation self-etching system.

이 실험의 목적은 동일한 깊이의 상아질에서 제 6세대의 self-etching system을 사용하여 C-factor가 상아질과 복합레진 사이의 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 건전한 대구치 80개를 선정하여 와동의 바닥면적은 각각 $16mm^2$로 동일하게 하고 깊이를 조절하여 C-factor가 각각 0.25, 2, 3, 4인 4개의 군으로 나누었다. 각 군별로 총 20개의 치아를 할당하였으며 접착제와 복합레진의 조합에 따라 다시 4개의 소군에 치아 5개씩을 배정하였다 상아질 접착제는 AQ Bond Plus 또는 Xeno III를 사용하였고, 복합레진은 fantasists 또는 Ceram-X mono를 사용하였다. 제조사의 지시대로 상아질 접착제를 도포한 후 60초간 광중합하였다. 24시간 동안증류수에 보관후 단면적이 $1.0{\times}1.0mm^2$인 복합레진-상아질 beam을 형성하여 1mm/min의 속도로 미세 인장결합강도를 측정하였다. One-way ANOVA와 Tukey test, 그리고 Pearson correlation test로 통계 처리하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. XenoIII와 Ceram-X mono군에서는 C-factor가 증가할수록 미세 인장결합강도가 유의하게 감소했으나 (p<0.05), 나머지 재료군에서 C-factor군간에 미세 인장결합강도의 유의한 차이가 없었다. 2. C-factor 3군에서는 Ad Bond Plus와 Fantasista군이 Xeno III와 Ceram-X mono군에 비해 높은 결합력을 보였으나 (p<0.05), C-factor 0.25군, 2군, 4군에서 4가지 접착제와 수복 레진의 조합 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 3. Fantasista군에서 C-factor와 미세 인장결합강도 사이에 일정한 상관관계를 발견할 수 없었고, Ceram-X mono군에서 C-factor가 증가할수록 미세 인장결합강도가 감소하는 경향을 보였다 (p<0.05). 이번 연구의 결과로 상아질의 깊이가 동일하고 6세대의 self-etching system을 사용하여 복합레진을 충전하는 경우 와동의 C-factor가 수복물의 미세 인장결합강도에 크게 영향을 미치지 않음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63:146-8, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
  2. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 55:446-7, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90173-3
  3. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-9, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  4. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 9:2-5, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8
  5. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 13:146-50, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80115-7
  6. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res. 77:1435-45, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060801
  7. He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effect of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater 23:533-38, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.012
  8. Uno S, Tanka T, Inoue S. The influence of configuration factors on cavity adaptation in compomer restoration. Dent Mater 18:19-31, 1999 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.18.19
  9. Shirai K, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and agind on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110-124, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
  10. Wattanawongpitak N, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of bonding system and composite type on adaptation of different C-factor restorations. Dent Mater 25:45-50, 2006 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.45
  11. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-40, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  12. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13:324-8, 2000
  13. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'Nobottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives: a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-80, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  14. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 78:898-905, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780041001
  15. Mallmann A, Soares FZM, Placido E, Ferrari M, Cardoso PEC. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching and single-bottle adhesive systems in different cavity configurations. J Adhes Dent 5:121-7, 2003
  16. 김보경. 와동의 형태가 상아질과 복합레진 사이의 결합력에 미 치는 영향. 석사 학위 논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 서울, 2007
  17. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 4:379-83, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80053-8
  18. Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 10:241-6, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-X
  19. Inoue T, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Anisotropy of tensile strengths of bovine dentin regarding dentinal tubule orientation and location. Dent Mater 21:32-43, 2002 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.32
  20. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness and Ca-concentration vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229-33, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90090-Y
  21. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 27:265- 74, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00060-8
  22. Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 5:33-8, 1992
  23. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins, Dent Mater 6:45-50, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90044-F
  24. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29:462-9, 2004
  25. Ruttermann S, Kruger S, Raab WH, Janda R. Polymerization shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of contemporary posterior resin-based filling materials - a comparative study. J Dent 35:806-13, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.014
  26. Kishikawa R, Koiwa A, Chikawa H, Cho E, Inai N, Tagami J. Effect of cavity form on adhesion to cavity floor. Am J Dent 18:311-4, 2005

Cited by

  1. Difference in bond strength according to filling techniques and cavity walls in box-type occlusal composite resin restoration vol.34, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.4.350
  2. Effect of Chlorhexidine Application Methods on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin in Class I Cavities vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2341/09-360-L
  3. Effect of Er:YAG lasing on the dentin bonding strength of two-step adhesives vol.36, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.409
  4. Effect of different chlorhexidine application times on microtensile bond strength to dentin in Class I cavities vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.9