A Study of the Design Characteristics of the Police Uniform As A Visual Language - Focused on the U.S., England, Italy, France and Korea -

시각언어로서의 교통경찰관복의 디자인특성 연구 - 미국, 영국, 이태리, 프랑스, 한국을 중심으로 -

  • 이정원 (홍익대학교 패션디자인) ;
  • 금기숙 (홍익대학교 섬유미술.패션디자인과)
  • Published : 2008.08.30

Abstract

Visual language is 'a form of communication without text'. Visual language is one of the strongest methods to spread knowledge. Uniforms could be interpreted as a symbolic language that establishes order in this complicated modern society by placing identity and responsibility on each members of various different organizations. In light of the above, the purpose of this research paper will be to analyze police uniforms of U.S.A, Great Britain, Italy, France and Korea as a form of visual language and interpreting them in terms of visual design in order to understand the fundamental ideas behind the designs and the effective applications thereof. Upon analysis of traffic police uniforms of each individual county mentioned above by separating each uniform's distinctive design, pattern, color, material and decoration based on visual factor, three characteristics of authority, dynamic functionality and friendliness were derived from comparing and analyzing each country's distinctive uniform design. The traditional unique role of police in our society was to maintain social order as their nature inherently possesses characteristic of authority and preservation, but has since undergone transition in many countries to appeal to the broader public by incorporating friendliness and dynamic functionality. Analyzing police uniforms in terms of visual linguistic sense requires a much more profound process of understanding beyond simple interpretation of configurative shapes. In conclusion, the true purpose of uniforms is to include and portray images of mankind's desire toward expressing ideas like 'mankind's bias toward existence beyond theirselves and the exercise of force through authority' and materializing such ideas into a physical form.

Keywords

References

  1. 루돌프 아른하임, 김정오 역 (1997). 시각적 사고. 서울: 이화문고, pp. 50-52
  2. M. E. Roach & J. B. Eicher (1965). Dress, Ador- nment and the Social Order. N.Y.: Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 127
  3. N. Joseph and N. Alex (1979). The Uniform: A Sociological Perspective. N.Y.: Dubu pp. 122-128
  4. 이황우. 경찰행정학. 서울: 법문사, pp. 32-34
  5. 이황우. 경찰행정학. 서울: 법문사, pp. 46
  6. 박선의 (1990). 디자인사전. 서울: 미진사, p. 171
  7. Marian L. Davis, 이화연 외 역 (1990). 복식의 시각디자인. 서울: 경춘사, p. 108
  8. Marian L. Davis, 이화연 외 역 (1990). 복식의 시각디자인. 서울: 경춘사, p. 66-68
  9. 김미지자 (1989). Texture와 Color Coordination의 감성공학적 Technology에 관한 연구. 한양대학교박사학위 청구논문, p. 67
  10. Marian L. Davis, 이화연 외 역 (1990). 복식의 시각디자인. 서울: 경춘사, p. 230
  11. Bruno Munari (2004). 정방론. Milano, Japanase Cobright by Bijutsu, p. 62
  12. D. A. Dondis (1976). 시각인식력의 입문서. 서울: 기문당 p. 54
  13. D. A. Dondis (1976). 시각인식력의 입문서. 서울: 기문당 p. 60
  14. Eva Heller, 이영희 역 (2002). 색의 유혹. 서울: 예담. pp. 39-82
  15. Smart barry, Foucault (1983). Marxism and Critique. London: R.K.P, p. 109
  16. 이광래 (1995). 미쎌푸코. 서울: 민음사, p. 205