한국식품영양과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition)

  • 제37권11호
  • /
  • Pages.1457-1464
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1226-3311(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5978(eISSN)
한국식품영양과학회 (The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시판 소건 샛줄멸의 식품성분 및 관능 특성

Food Components and Sensual Characterization of Commercial Plain-dried Silver-stripe Round Herring

  • 김형준 (경상대학교 해양생명과학부/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 윤민석 (경상대학교 해양생명과학부/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 박용석 (제주특별자치도 해양수산자원연구소) ;
  • 하진환 (제주대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 정인권 (부산지방식품의약품안전청) ;
  • 허민수 (경상대학교 해양생명과학부/해양산업연구소) ;
  • 김진수 (경상대학교 해양생명과학부/해양산업연구소)
  • Kim, Hyung-Jun (Dept. of Marine Bioscience/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yoon, Min-Seok (Dept. of Marine Bioscience/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Yong-Seok (Jeju Special Self Governing Province Marine and Fisheries Resources Research Institute) ;
  • Ha, Jin-Hwan (Dept. of Food Bioengineering, Cheju National University) ;
  • Jung, In-Kwon (Import Management Team, Busan Regional Food & Drug Administration) ;
  • Heu, Min-Soo (Dept. of Marine Bioscience/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Dept. of Marine Bioscience/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

제주특별자치도의 특산품으로 개발한 소건 샛줄멸의 효율적 이용, 마케팅 및 규격화를 위한 기초자료로 활용할 목적으로 소건 샛줄멸의 식품성분 특성에 대하여 살펴보았고, 아울러 이를 자건 샛줄멸 및 자건 멸치의 식품성분과도 비교, 검토하였다. 수분함량 및 염도는 소건 샛줄멸이 각각 31.9% 및 7.6%로, 자건 샛줄멸(각각 27.2% 및 12.3%) 및 자건 멸치(각각 22.8% 및 15.4%)에 비하여 수분함량의 경우 높았고, 염도의 경우 낮았다. 과산화물값, 지방산 조성, 황색도 및 갈변도의 결과로 미루어 보아 지질의 산화정도는 소건 샛줄멸이 자건 샛줄멸 및 자건 멸치에 비하여 높았다. 소건 샛줄멸이 자건 샛줄멸 및 자건 멸치에 비하여 총아미노산 함량의 경우 낮았으나, 칼슘과 인 함량의 경우 높았다. 열수 가용성 질소, 엑스분 질소, 유리아미노산 및 taste value의 결과로 미루어 보아 소건 샛줄멸의 맛은 강도 및 경향에서 모두 자건 샛줄멸뿐만이 아니라 자건 멸치에 비하여도 우수 하였다. 소건 샛줄멸은 자건 샛줄멸에 비하여 맛 및 형상에서 우수하였으나 반드시 비린내에 대한 개선이 이루어져야 할 것으로 판단되었다.

For the effective use of under-utilized resources, silver-stripe round herring (SSRH), the plain-dried SSRH was investigated and compared with boiled-dried SSRH and boiled-dried anchovy on the food component and sensual characterization. Moisture content and salinity of the plain-dried SSRH were 31.9% and 7.6%, respectively. Moisture content of the plain-dried SSRH was higher, while the salinity was lower than those of boiled-dried SSRH and anchovy. According to the results of peroxide value, fatty acid composition, Hunter b value, and browning index, the rancidity was higher in plain-dried SSRH than in boiled-dried SSRH and anchovy. When compared to the boiled-dried SSRH and anchovy, the plain-dried SSRH was higher in calcium and phosphorus contents, while lower in total content of amino acid. According to the results of hot-water soluble-N, trichloroacetic acid-N, free amino acid, and taste value, the taste of plain-dried SSRH was superior to those of the boiled-dried SSRH and anchovy. The results of chemical components and sensory evaluation indicated that the plained-dried SSRH could be substituted for boiled-dried anchovy classified into special grade, if fish odor of SSRH can be improved.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi Y, Kim JH, Park JY. 2002. Marine fishes of Korea. Kyohak Publishing Co., Ltd., Seoul. p 86
  2. Kim IS, Lee TG, Yeum DM, Cho ML, Park HW, Cho TJ, Heu MS, Kim JS. 2000. Food component characteristics of cold air dried anchovies. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 973-980
  3. Heu MS, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Jeong IK, Park YS, Ha JH, Kim JS. 2008. Component characteristics of boiled-dried silver-stripe round herring. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 891-899 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.7.891
  4. Kim JS, Yang SK, Heu MS. 2000. Food component characteristics of plain dried anchovies on the market. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 20-25
  5. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. p 69-74
  6. Ministry of Social Welfare of Japan. 1960. Guide to experiment of sanitary infection. III. Volatile basic nitrogen. Kenpakusha, Tokyo. p 30-32
  7. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911-917 https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099
  8. AOAC. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. p 487-488
  9. AOCS. 1990. AOCS Official Method Ce 1b-89. In Official Methods and Recommended Practice. 4th ed. AOCS, Champaign, IL, USA
  10. Chung CY, Toyomizu MT. 1976. Studies on the browning of dehydrated foods as a function of water activity-I. Effect of Aw on browning in amino acid-lipid systems. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish 42: 697-702 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.42.697
  11. Heu MS, Kim JS. 2002. Comparison of quality among boiled-dried anchovies caught from different sea. J Korean Fish Soc 35: 173-178
  12. Kato H, Rhue M, Nishimura T. 1989. Role of acids and peptides in food taste. In Flavor Chemistry: Trends and Development. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. p 158-174
  13. Kim JS, Heu MS, Kang KT, Kim HS, Jee SJ, Park TB. 2006. Development of spaghetti sauce with adductor muscle of pearl oyster. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 1484-1490 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.10.1484
  14. Kim JS, Kang KT, Heu MS. 2007. Development of spaghetti sauce with oyster. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 36: 93-99 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.1.093
  15. Steel RGD, Torrie H. 1980. Principle and Procedures of Statistic. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo. p 187-221
  16. Park YH, Chang DS, Kim SB. 1995. Seafood processing and utilization. Hyungseol Publishing Co., Seoul. p 75-79
  17. Korea Food Research Institute. 1998. Research on food standardization (KS) of the processed seafood products. Seoul. p 121-185
  18. Kim JS, Heu MS, Kim HS. 2001. Quality comparison of commercial boiled-dried anchovies processed in Korea and Japan. J Korean Fish Soc 34: 685-690
  19. Kim JS, Kim HS, Heu MS. 2006. Introductory foods. Hyoil Publishing Co., Seoul. p 109-116
  20. Kim JS, Oh KS, Lee JS. 2001. Comparison of food component between conger eel (Conger myriaster) and sea eel (Muraenesox cinereus). J Korean Fish Soc 34: 678-684
  21. Hamada M, Kumagai H. 1988. Chemical composition of sardine scale. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 54: 1987-1992 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.54.1987