DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Potential Allelic Association of Microsatellite Markers on Chromosome 1 with Economic Traits in Korean Native Chicken

한국재래닭 1번 염색체내 초위성체 유전표지를 이용한 경제형질 연관 지역 탐색

  • Kim, H.K. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Oh, J.D. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, B.S. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, M.N. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Chae, E.J. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jung, H.M. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Seo, O.S. (Poulrty Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choe, H.S. (School of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeon, G.J. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, H.K. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kong, H.S. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University)
  • 김학규 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 오재돈 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 강보석 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 박미나 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 채은진 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 정한민 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 서옥석 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 최호성 (전북대학교 동물자원과학부) ;
  • 전광주 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 이학교 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 공홍식 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

A total of 17 polymorphic microsatellite markers on chromosome 1 were used for allelic association tests with phenotypic traits in Korean native chicken. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the frequencies of individual alleles between the high and the low trait groups. The frequency of allele 123 of MCW0160 showed a significant difference between the high and the low groups in the trait of egg weight (EW). Three markers, namely ADL0234, UMA1.125 and ADL0101, were found to show significant differences in allelic distribution for the trait of the first lay day (FLD). UMA1.117, ADL0020, UMA 1.019, LMA1 and ADL0238 were found to show significant differences in allelic distribution for the trait of body weight (BW). ADL0101 and ADL0238 were found to show significant differences in allelic distribution for the trait of number of egg production(EP). In this study, we identified the QTL for economic traits at around 94 (MCW0160), 151 (ADL0234), 170 (UMA1.125), 225 (UMA1.117), 285 (ADL0020), 387 (UMA1.019), 418 (LMA1), 500 (ADL0101) and 520 (ADL0238) cM on chromosome 1 in Korean native chicken. The results provided a useful guideline for identification of positional candidate gene and marker-assisted selection for economic traits in Korean native chicken.

본 연구는 한국재래닭의 1번 염색체내 존재하는 17개의 MS(microsatellite) marker를 이용하여 경제형질과 관련하여 유의적인 연관성을 가진 지역을 탐색하기 위하여 실시하였다. 1번 염색체내 경제형질과의 유의적인 연관성을 가진 지역을 탐색하기 위하여 분석된 17개의 MS marker를 대상으로 각 marker별 대립 유전자의 최다 출현 빈도를 지닌 두 개의 대립 유전자를 선발하였다. 선발된 각각의 대립 유전자는 각 경제형질별 성적을 바탕으로 고능력 집단과 저능력 집단으로 나누었으며, 두 집단간의 Chi-squire 검정을 통해 경제형질과의 연관성을 확인하였다. 분석된 결과에 따르면 난중의 경우 94 cM에 위치한 MCW0106, 1개의 지역에서 유의적인 연관성이 탐색되었다. 시산일령의 경우, 3개의 지역(ADL0234, UMA 1.125, ADL0101)에서 유의적인 연관성이 탐색되었고, 체중의 경우 6개의 지역(UMA1.117, ADL0020, UMA1.019, LAMP1, ADL0101, ADL0238)에서 유의적인 연관성이 탐색되었으며, 마지막으로 산란수의 경우 2개의 지역(ADL0101, ADL0238)에서 유의적인 연관성을 확인하였다. ADL0101는 시산일령, 체중 그리고 산란수에서의 유의적인 연관성이 확인되었으며, 산란수에서는 두개의 대립 유전자(174, 178) 모두에서 유의적인 연관성이 탐색되었음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. DeKoning DJ, Haley CS, Windsor D, Hocking PM, Griffin H, Morris A, Vincent J, Burt DW 2004 Segregation of QTL for production traits in commercial meat-type chickens. Genet Res 83(3):211-20 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672304006846
  2. Groenen MA, Cheng HH, Bumstead N, Benkel BF, Briles WE, Burke T, Burt DW, Crittenden LB, Dodgson J, Hillel J, Lamont S, de Leon AP, Soller M, Takahashi H, Vignal A 2000 A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res 10:137-147
  3. Hansen C, Yi N, Zhang YM, Xu S, Gavora J, Cheng HH 2005 Identification of QTL for production traits in chickens. Anim Biotechnol 16(1):67-79 https://doi.org/10.1081/ABIO-200055016
  4. Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, Ponting CP, Bork P, Burt DW, Groenen MA, Delany ME 2004 Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03154
  5. Ikeobi CON, Woolliams JA, Morrice DR, Law A, Windsor D, Burt DW, Hocking PM 2004 Quantitative trait loci for meat yield and muscle distribution in a broiler layer cross. Livestock Production Science 87:143-151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.09.020
  6. Kerje S, Carlborg O, Jacobsson L, Schutz K, Hartmann C, Jensen P, Andersson L 2003. The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Animal Genetics 34:264-274 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01000.x
  7. Markljung E, Braunschweig MH, Karlskov-Mortensen P, Bruun CS, Sawera M, Cho IC, Hedebro-Velander I, Josell A, Lundstrom K, von Seth G, Jorgensen CB, Fredholm M, Andersson L 2008 Genome-wide identification of quantitative trait loci in a cross between Hampshire and Landrace II: meat quality traits. BMC Genet 28:9(1):22
  8. McElroy JP, Kim JJ, Harry DE, Brown SR, Dekkers JCM, Lamont SJ 2006 Identification of trait loci affecting white meat percentage and other growth and carcass traits in commercial broiler chickens. Poultry Science 85:593-605 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.4.593
  9. Park HB, Jacobsson L, Wahlberg P, Siegel PB, Andersson L 2006 QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross betweenchicken lines divergently selected for growth. Physiol Genomics 25(2):216-223 https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00113.2005
  10. Sasaki O, Odawara S, Takahashi H, Nirasawa K, Oyamada Y, Yamamoto R, Ishii K, Nagamine Y, Takeda H, Kobayashi E, Furukawa T 2004 Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting body weight, egg characterand egg production in $F_2$ intercross chickens. Animal Genetics 35(3):188-194 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01133.x
  11. Schmid M., Nanda I, Guttenbach M, Steinlein C, Hoehn M, Schartl M, Haaf T, Weigend S, Fries R, Buerstedde JM, Wimmers K, Burt DW, Smith J, A'Hara S, Law A, Griffin DK, Bumstead N, Kaufman J, Thomson PA, Burke T, Groenen MA, Crooijmans RP, Vignal A, Fillon V, Morisson M, Pitel F, Tixier-Boichard M, Ladjali-Mohammedi K, Hillel J, Maki-Tanila A, Cheng HH, Delany ME, Burnside J, Mizuno S 2000 First report on chicken genes and chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 90:169-218 https://doi.org/10.1159/000056772
  12. Schreiweis MA, Hester PY, Moody DE 2005 Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with bone traits and body weight in an F2 resource population of chickens. Genet Sel Evol 37(6):677-98 https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-37-7-677
  13. Schrooten C, Bink MC, Bovenhuis H 2004 Whole genome scan to detect chromosomal regions affecting multiple traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 87(10):3550-60 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73492-X
  14. Sewalem A, Morrice DM, Law A, Windsor D, Haley CS, Ikeobi CO, Burt DW, Hocking PM 2002 Mapping of quantitative trait loci for body weight at three, six, and nine weeksof age in a broiler layer cross. Poult Sci 81(12):1775-1781 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.12.1775
  15. VanKaam JB, Groenen MA, Bovenhuis H, Veenendaal A, Vereijken AL, VanArendonk JA 1999 Whole genome scan in chickens for quantitative trait loci affecting carcass traits. Poult Sci 78:1091-1099 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.8.1091
  16. VanKaam JB, VanArendonk JA, Groenen MA, Bovenhuis H, Vereijken AL, Crooijmans RP, VanDerPoel JJ, Veenendaal A 1998 Whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting body weight in chickens using a three generation design. Livest Prod Sci 54:133-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00171-1
  17. Weinshilboum R, Wang L 2004 Pharma-cogenomics: Bench to bedside. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(9):739-748 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1497

Cited by

  1. Construction of Genetic Linkage Map using Microsatellite and SNP Markers in Korean Native Chicken vol.42, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.42.1.77