DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tenderness Survey of Branded Hanwoo Beef - 2007: Assessment of Warner-Bratzler Shear for Hanwoo Beef by Quality Grade and Subprimal Cuts

브랜드 한우고기 연도 조사 - 2007 : 육질등급 및 소분할 부위별 전단력 평가

  • Kim, Jin-Hyoung (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Seong, Pil-Nam (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Soo-Hyun (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeong, Da-Woon (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • In, Tae-Sik (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeong, Jin-Hyung (Animal Products Grading Service) ;
  • Park, Beom-Young (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Moon (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hun (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ahn, Chong-Nam (Quality Control and Utilization of Animal Products Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • Published : 2008.08.30

Abstract

Eight subprimal cuts purchased from the branded Hanwoo beef of 3 quality grades ($1^{++}$, $1^+$, 1) at 13 stores were evaluated the tenderness using Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS). The beef frequency ratio (%) depending on postmortem aging periods were investigated. The 37.5 (quality grade $1^{++}$), 45.8 (quality grade $1^+$), and 36.4% (quality grade $1^{++}$) of branded beef were aged for < 7 d, 26.6 (quality grade $1^{++}$), 47.2 (quality grade $1^+$) and 36.4% (quality grade 1) were aged for $7{\sim}13$ d, and 31.3 (quality grade $1^+$), 4.2 (quality grade $1^+$) and 25.8% (quality grade $1^+$) were aged for 14 to 20 d. The temperature of cold room in stores was ranged average 2.27 to $2.42^{\circ}C$. WBS values for ansimsal (tenderloin), witdngsimsal (ribeye), cheggtsal (shortloin), doganisal (knuckle) and moongchisatae (hind shank) from branded Hanwoo beef of quality grade $1^{++}$ were tender than those from branded Hanwoo beef of quality grade 1 (p<0.05). WBS values for ansimsal (tenderloin) were 2.56 (quality grade $1^{++}$), 2.76 (quality grade $1^+$) and 3.10 kg (quality grade 1), respectively, and those for doganisal (knuckle, quality grade $1^{++}$), hongdukesal (eye of round, quality grade $1^+$) and bosupsal (top sirloin, quality grade 1) were 4.76, 4.96 and 5.66kg, respectively (p<0.05). The frequency ratio (%) of WBS < 3.9 kg in the all subprimal cuts from branded Hanwoo beef of quality grade $1^{++}$ were 100 [ansimsal (tenderloin) and cheggtsal (shortloin)], 87.5 [witdngsimsal (ribeye)] and 62.5% [bosupsal (top sirloin)], whereas that of WBS > 4.6 kg were 50.0% [hongdukesal (eye of round) and doganisal (knuckle)]. The frequency ratio of WBS < 3.9 kg in the an subprimal cuts of quality grade $1^+$ were 100 [ansimsal (tenderloin) and witdngsimsal (ribeye)] and 44.4% [cheggtsal (shortloin) and gurisal (chuck tender)], whereas that of WBS > 4.6 kg were 66.7 [hongdukesal (eye of round)], 55.6 [doganisal (knuckle)] and 44.4% [bosupsal (top sirloin)]. The frequency ratio (%) of WBS < 3.9 kg in the all subprimal cuts of quality grade 1 were 88.9 [ansimsal (tenderloin)], 62.5 [cheggtsal (shortloin)] and 44.4% [witdngsimsal (ribeye)], whereas that of WBS > 4.6 kg were 100.0 [doganisal (knuckle)] 62.7 [hongdukesal (eye of round)], 62.5 [gurisal (chuck tender)] and 55.6% [moongchisatae (hind shank)]. From these results, subprimal cuts from branded Hanwoo beef were marketed with short aging periods and high frequency ratio (%) of WBS > 4.6 kg.

본 연구는 시판중인 브랜드 한우고기의 연도 조사를 위하여 13개 브랜드 한우고기 판매점에서 3개 등급(육질 $1^{++}$, $1^+$, 1등급)과 8개 소분할 부위별로 구입한 한우고기의 전단력을 분석하였다. 브랜드 한우고기 육질 $1^{++}$ 등급, $1^+$ 등급, 1등급의 숙성기간 분포비율은 7일 미만이 37.5, 45.8, 36.4% 였고, 7일-13일이 26.6, 47.2, 36.4%였으며, 14일-20일이 31.3, 4.2, 25.8%였다. 브랜드 한우고기 판매장의 냉장고 온도는 평균 $2.27-2.42^{\circ}C$ 범위였다. 안삼실, 윗등심살, 채끝살, 도가니살과 홍두께살에서 육질 $1^{++}$등급이 육질 1 등급보다 연하였다(p<0.05). 브랜드 한우고기 육질 $1^{++}$ 등급, $1^+$ 등급, 1 등급의 소분할 부위 중 안심살의 전단력가가 각각 2.56, 2.76, 3.10 kg로 가장 연하였고, 각 육질등급에서 도가니살이 4.76 kg,홍두께살이 4.96 kg, 보섭살이 5.66 kg로 가장 질긴 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 육질 $1^{++}$ 등급의 브랜드 한우고기 소분할 부위에서 전단력가 3.9 kg 이하의 분포비율은 안심살과 채끝살이 100%, 윗등심살과 보섭살이 각각 87.5, 62.5%인 반면 전단력가 4.6 kg 이상 분포비율은 흥두께살과 도가니살이 각각 50%였다. 육질 $1^+$ 등급의 브랜드 한우고기 소분할 부위에서 전단력가 3.9 kg 이하 분포비율이 안심살과 윗등심살이 100%, 채끝살과 꾸리살이 각각 44.4%였고, 전단력가 4.6 kg 이상 분포비율은 홍두께살, 도가니살, 보섭살이 각각 66.7, 55.6, 44.4%를 차지하였다. 육질 1등급의 브랜드 한우고기 소분할 부위에서 전단력가 3.9 kg 이하 분포비율은 안심살과 채끝살, 윗등심살이 각각 88.9, 62.5, 44.4%인 반면에 전단력가 4.6 kg 이상 분포비율은 도가니살이 100.0%, 홍두께살, 꾸리살, 뭉치사태가 각각 62.5, 62.5, 55.6%로 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 종합하면, 시판 브랜드 한우고기는 숙성기간이 짧고, 전단력가 4.6 kg 이상 분포비율이 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Boleman, S. J., Boleman, S. L., Miller, R. K., Taylor, J. F., Cross, H. R., Wheeler, T. L., Koohmaraie, M., Shackelford, S. D., Miller, M. F., West, R. L., Johnson, D. D., and Savell, J. W. (1997) Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 1521-1524
  2. Brooks, J. C., Belew, J. B., Griffin, D. B., Gwartney, B. L., Hale, D. S., Henning, W. R., Johnson, D. D., Morgan, J. B., Parrish, Jr. F. C., Reagan, J. O., and Savell, J. W. (2000) National beef tenderness survey - 1998. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 1852-1860
  3. Cho, S. H. (2003) Technology development of livestock food products in the 21st century. Rural Development Administration, National Livestock Research Institute pp. 171-206
  4. Hwang, I. H., Park, B. Y., Cho, S. H., Kim, J. H., and Lee, J. M. (2004) Meat quality of highly marbled imported beef with reference to Hanwoo beef. J. Anim. Sci. Technol (Kor.), 46, 659-666 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2004.46.4.659
  5. Lorenzen, C. L., Neely, T. R., Miller, R. K., Tatum, J. D., Wise, J. W., Taylor, J. F., Buyck, M. J., Reagan, J. O., and Savell, J. W. (1999) Beef Customer Satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top loin steak. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 637-644
  6. Morgan, J. B., Savell, J. W., Hale, D. S., Miller, R. K., Griffin, D. B., Cross, H. R., and Shackelford, S. D. (1991) National beef tenderness survey. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 3274-3283 https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6983274x
  7. Neely, T. R., Lorenzen, C. L., Miller, R. K., Tatum, J. D., Wise, J. W., Taylor, J. F., Buyck, M. J., Reagan, J. O., and Savell, J. W. (1998) Beef Customer Satisfaction: Role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1027-1033
  8. Neely, T. R., Lorenzen, C. L., Miller, R. K., Tatum, J. D., Wise, J. W., Taylor, J. F., Buyck, M. J., Reagan, J. O., and Savell, J. W. (1999) Beef Customer Satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 653-660
  9. Park, B. Y., Cho, S. H., Yoo, Y. M., Kim, J. H. Lee, J. M. Joung, S. K., and Kim, Y. K. (2000) Effect of intramuscular fat contents on the physicochemical properties of beef longssimus dorsi from Hanwoo. Korean J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 42, 189-194
  10. Savell, J. W., Lorenzen, C. L., Neely, T. R., Miller, R. K., Tatum, J. D., Wise, J. W., Taylor, J. F., Buyck, M. J., and Reagan, J. O. (1999) Beef Customer Satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 645-652
  11. SAS. (1998) SAS/STAT user's guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary NC USA
  12. Shackelford, S. D., Morgan, J. B., Savell, J. W., and Cross, H. R. (1991) Identification of threshold levels for Warner-Bratzler shear force in top loin steaks. J. Muscle Foods 2, 289-296 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1991.tb00461.x
  13. Voges, K. L., Mason, C. L., Brooks, J. C., Delmore, R. J., Griffin, D. B., Hale, D. S., Henning, W. R., Johnson, D. D., Lorenzen, C. L., Maddock, R. J., Miller, R. K., Morgan, J. B., Baird, B. E., Gwartney, B. L. and Savell, J. W. (2007) National beef tenderness survey - 2006: Assessment of warner-bratzler and sensory panel ratings for beef from US retail and foodservice establishments. Meat Sci. 77, 357-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.03.024

Cited by

  1. Canadian beef tenderness survey: 2001–2011 vol.93, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-112
  2. Diversity of Calpain-Calpastatin gene frequencies in Brown, Brindle and Jeju Black Hanwoo vol.40, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2013.40.2.147
  3. Effect of Feeding Mugwort (Artemisia capillaris) TMR Fodder on Nutritional Composition of Hanwoo Beef vol.21, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2011.21.4.568