Genotype $\times$ Environment Interaction for Yield in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

  • Shim, Kang-Bo (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kang, Churl-Whan (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hwang, Chung-Dong (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Pae, Suk-Bok (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Jin (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Byun, Jae-Cheon (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Keum-Yong (Upland & Industrial Crop Division, Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration)
  • Published : 2008.09.30

Abstract

Application of genotype by environment ($G\;{\times}\;E$) interaction would be used for identifying optimum test condition of the varietal adaptation in the establishment of breeding purpose. Yield and yield components were used to perform additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Significant difference for $G\;{\times}\;E$ interaction were observed for all variable examined. For yield, 0.18 of total sum of squares corresponded to $G\;{\times}\;E$ interaction. Correlation analysis was carried out between genotypic scores of the first interaction principal component axis (IPCA 1) for agronomic characters. Significant correlations were observed between IPCA 1 for yield and capsule bearing stem length (CBSL), number of capsule per plant (NOC). The biplot of grain yield means for IPCA1 which accounted for 34% of the variation in total treatment sums of squares showed different reaction according to $G\;{\times}\;E$ interaction, genotypes and environments. Taegu showed relatively lower positive IPCA1 scores, and it also showed smaller coefficient variation of yield mean where it is recommendable as a optimal site for the sesame cultivar adaptation and evaluation trial. In case of variables, Yangbaek and M1 showed relatively lower IPCA1 scores, but the score direction showed opposite each other on the graph. Ansan, Miryang1, Miryang4, and Miryang6 seemed to be similar group in view of yield response against IPCA1 scores. These results will be helpful to select experimental site for sesame in Korea to minimize $G\;{\times}\;E$ interaction for the selection of promising genotype with higher stability.

Keywords

References

  1. Allard, R. W. and A. D. Bradshaw. 1964. Implications of genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4 : 503-507 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x
  2. Eberhart, S. A. and W. A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6 : 40-46
  3. Fehr, W. R. 1987. Principal of cultivar development. Vol. 1 Theory and technique. New York. Macmillan Publishing Company
  4. Gauch, H. G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. AMMI analysis of factorial design. Amsterdam; Elsevier
  5. Laurentin H., D. Montilla, and V. Garcia. 2006. interpreting genotype ${\ times}$ environment interaction in sesame (Sesamum indicum). J. Agricultural Sci. 145 : 263-271
  6. Yan, W. and L. A. Hunt 1998. Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. Plant Breed. Rev. 16 : 135-178
  7. Yan, W., L. A. Hunt, and Q. Sheng. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40 : 597-605 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
  8. Yan, W. and L. A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype ${\ times}$ environment interaction for winter weat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41 : 19-25 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x
  9. Zobel, R. W., M. J. Wright, and H. G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80 : 388-393 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x