Effects of Hardener and Extender Contents on Curing Behavior of Urea-Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin

  • Eom, Young-Geun (Department of Forest Products, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University) ;
  • XU, Guang-Zhu (Department of Forest Products, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Kyu (Material Property Analysis Lab., National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joong (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2008.08.12
  • Accepted : 2008.09.05
  • Published : 2008.09.25

Abstract

This study was conducted to discuss the effects of hardener and extender contents on peak temperature, reaction enthalpy (${\Delta}H$), gelation time, viscosity change, and pH value in three types of UMF (urea-melamine- formaldehyde) resin with the help of perpHecT LogR meter, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and advanced rheometric expansion system (ARES), The results indicated that the pH value of Control A steeply decreased to 5,2 in the early stage but relatively remained constant thereafter as in Synthesis 1 and Synthesis 2, The peak temperature and time decreased as well, whereas ${\Delta}H$ and viscosity increased with the increase of hardener content. On the other hand, ${\Delta}H$ was not changed up to the extender content of 5% and then decreased with its further addition, And the pH value and peak temperature showed no change with the increase of extender content at the hardener content of 5% in three types of UMF resin, The effect of hardener content in this experiment, however, appeared more conspicuous in Control A than in the other two types of Synthesis 1 and Synthesis 2, These results might be caused by higher molecular weight with longer chains of methylene ($-CH_2-$) and methylene ($-CH_2-O-CH_2-$) ether bridges or much more branched chains in Control A.

Keywords

References

  1. Chow, S. and P. R. Steiner. 1975. Catalytic, exothermic reaction of urea-formaldehyde resin. Holzforschung 29(1): 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1975.29.1.4
  2. Christiansen, A., W. R. A. Follensbee, R. A. Geimer, J. A. Koutsky, and G. E. Myers. 1993. Phenol-formaldehyde resin curing and bonding in steam-injection pressing. Part II. Difference between rates of chemical and mechanical responses to resin cure. Holzforchung 47: 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1993.47.1.76
  3. Follensbee, R. A., J. A. Koutsky, A. W. Christiansen, G. E. Myers, and R. L. Geimer. 1993. Development of dynamic mechanical methods to characterize the cure state of phenolic resins. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 47: 1481-1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070470820
  4. Higuchi, M. and I. Skata. 1979. Studies on the improvement of urea-formaldehyde resin adhesives (1). A possibility of water-resistance improvement. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 25: 496-502.
  5. Kim, S. M., H.-J. Kim, H.-S. Kim, and H. H. Lee. 2006. Effect of bio-scavengers on the curing behavior and bonding properties of melamine-formaldehyde resins. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 291(9): 1027-1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200600213
  6. Lee, Y.-K., D.-J. Kim, H.-J. Kim, T.-S. Hwang, M. Rafailovich, and J. Sokolov. 2003. Activation energy and curing behavior of resol- and novolac- type phenolic resins by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 89(10): 2589-2596. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12340
  7. Liu, R. G. 1989. A study on the curing reaction of UF resin with NH4Cl hardener by DSC. China Wood Industry 3(3): 8-12.
  8. Myers, G. E. 1990. Formaldehyde liberation and cure behavior of urea-formaldehyde resins. Holzforschung 2: 117-126.
  9. No, B. Y. and M. G. Kim. 2005. Curing of low level melamine-modified urea-formaldehyde particleboard binder resins studied with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Journal of Applied Polymer Science 97(1): 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21759
  10. Pizzi, A. 1983. Wood adhesives: Chemistry and technology. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York. pp. 59.
  11. Simmer, K., T. Kaljuvee, and P. Christjanson. 2003. Thermal behaviour of urea-formaldehyde resins during curing. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 72(2): 607-617. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024590019244
  12. Xing, C., J. Deng, S. Y. Deng, B. Riedl, and A. Cloutier. 2005. Differential scanning calorimetry characterization of urea-formaldehyde resin cuing behavior as affected by less desirable wood material and catalyst content. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 98: 2027-2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22118
  13. Xing, C., S. Y. Zhang, J. Deng, and S. Wang. 2007. Urea-formaldehyde-resin gel time as affected by the pH value, solid content, and catalyst. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 103: 1566-1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.25343