Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Growth Characteristics and Yields of Autumn-Sowing Annual Legumes in Paddy Field of Central Provinces

중부지역 논에서 월년생 두과 사료작물의 생육특성 및 수량 비교

  • Published : 2008.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to compare the agronomic characteristics, flowering condition and productivity of introduced annual legumes at paddy field of Seonghwan(Cheonan, Chungnam, Korea) from September 2006 to May 2007. Annual legumes used in this study were hairy vetch(Vicia villsa, Rosa), crimson clover(Trifolium incarnatum, Contea), berseem clover(Trifolium alexandrinum, Alexandria), persian clover(Trifolium resupinatum, Prolific), balansa clover(Trifolium michelianum, Paradona), sweet clover(Melilotus officinalis, Yellow) and forage pea(Pisum sativum, Austrian). Emergency rate after seeding were 90% or more in crimson clover, hairy vetch, forage pea and berseem clover. Wintering of hairy vetch and crimson clover were excellent as 98% and 95%, respectively. Flowering rate of harvesting date(May 10) was 100% in crimson clover, 98% in balansa clover, 5% in persian clover and others were not flowering. Fresh and dry matter yield of crimson clover were highest as 72,556 kg/ha and 16,062 kg/ha, respectively. Crude protein yield of hairy vetch was highest as 2,929 kg/ha but not significant with crimson clover(2,169 kg/ha). TDN yield of crimson clover was highest as 9,007 kg/ha but not significant with hairy vetch(7,366 kg/ha). According to the results from this study, it is suggested that crimson clover would be recommendable for autumn-sowing annual legume at paddy field of Central Provinces.

본 시험은 우선 논에서 여름철 사료작물과 연계할 수 있는 겨울철 재배에 적합한 월년생 두과작물로 이듬해의 개화를 통한 경관효과와 수량이 우수한 초종의 선발을 목적으로 충남 천안시 성환읍에 위치한 벼재배 농가포장에서 2006년 9월부터 2007년 5월까지 수행되었다. 월년생 두과 사료작물로서 Hairy vetch(Vicia villsa), Crimsom clover(Trifolium incarnatum), Berseem clover(Trifolium alexandrinum), Persian clover(Trifolium resupinatum), Balansa clover(Trifolium michelianum), Sweet clover(Melilotus officinalis) 및 Forage pea(Pisum sativum) 각 1품종을 공시하였다. 파종 45일후 출현율은 Crimsom clover, Hairy vetch, Forage pea 및 Berseem clover가 90%이상으로 높았으며 월동율은 Hairy vetch와 Crimsom clover가 각각 98%와 95%로 가장 높았다. 경관과 관계되는 개화율은 수확시(5월 10일)에 Crimson clover가 100%로 조사되었다. 생초수량과 건물수량은 Crimson clover가 각각 72,556 kg/ha과 16,062 kg/ha으로 가장 높았다. 조단백질 수량은 Hairy vetch가 2,929 kg/ha으로 가장 높았지만 Crimson clover(2,169 kg/ha)와는 차이가 없었다(p<0.05). TDN 수량은 Crimson clover가 9,007 kg/ha으로 가장 높았지만 Hairy vetch(7,366 kg/ha)와는 차이가 없었다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과로부터 월동율, 수량 그리고 경관 등을 고려할 때 Crimson clover가 가장 적합한 것으로 사료되지만 추후 보완 연구가 필요하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김원호. 1994. 작물의 잔주와 그 관리가 사일리지용 옥수수의 생장, 수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
  2. 김종덕, 김수곤, 권찬호. 2004. 콩과목초의 사초 수량과 품질 비교. 한국동물자원과학회지. 46(3): 437-442
  3. 김원호, 서 성, 임영철, 최기준, 김기용, 이종경, 윤봉기. 2007a. 논에서 적응 우수 Crimson Clover 품종 선발. 한국초지학회지 27(3):151-154 https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.3.151
  4. 김원호, 서 성, 김맹중, 신재순, 전병수, 정민웅, 안병석, 윤봉기. 2007b. 논에서 적응성이 우수한 Vetch류 품종 선발. 한국초지학회지 27(3):155- 160 https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.3.155
  5. 김종근, 정의수, 임영철, 서 성, 김맹중, 김종덕. 2004. 도입 베치의 품종에 따른 생육특성 및 생산성 비교 연구. 한국초지학회지 24(2):177-182
  6. 농촌진흥청. 2003. 농사시험연구조사기준
  7. 서종호, 이호진, 허일봉, 김시주, 김충국, 조현숙. 2000. 동계 녹비작물 초종별 화학성분 및 생산성 비교. 한국초지학회지. 20(3):193-198
  8. 오윤진, 김제규. 1991. 간척지 수도작의 현황과 발전방향. 농진청 심포지움 p. 17
  9. A.O.A.C. 1990. Offcial method of analysis. 15th ed. Association of offcial analytical chemists. Washington, DC
  10. Fraser, M.D., R. Fychan and R. Jones. 2001. The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of forage pea and field bean silages. Grass and Forage Science. 56(3):218-230 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00268.x
  11. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest.1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural Handbook. No. 379, ARS, USDA, Washington, DC
  12. Hackney, B., B. Dear and G. Crocker. 2007. Berseem clover (PRIMEFACT 388). www.dpi.nsw. gov.au
  13. Hamilton. 2006. Balansa clover(Agriculture Notes). AG0714, ISSN 1329-8062. State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Australia
  14. Lacy, J., B. Dear and G. sandral. 2003. Persian clover. Agfact P2.5.22(4th ed.). www.agric.nsw. gov.au/reader/5487
  15. Ramesh, P., P.K. Ghosh, K.S. Reddy, Ajay, S. Ramana and R.S. Choudhary. 2005. Assessment of biomass, productivity and sustainability of soybean based cropping systems at three levels of nitrogen in deep vertisols of semi-arid tropical India. Journal of sustainable agriculture. 26(2):43-59
  16. Rochester, I.J., M.B. Peoples, N.R. Hulugalle, R.R. Gault and G.A. Constable. 2001. Using legumes to enchance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton croping systems. Field Crops Research 70:27-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00151-9
  17. SAS. 2003. SAS Enterprise Guide 3.0.0.369. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA
  18. Sharma, R.P., S.K. Pathak, M. Haque and K.R. Raman. 2004. Diversification of traditional rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping system for sustainable productions in South Biher alluvial plains. Indian journal of agronomy. 49(4):218-222
  19. Shrestha, A., O.B. Hesterman, J.M. Squire, J.W. Fisk and C.C. Sheaffer. 1998. Annual medics and berseem clover as emergency forages. Agron. J. 90:197-201 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000020013x
  20. Verhallen, A., A. Hayes and T. Taylor. 2003. Cover Crops : Sweet Clover. http://www.omafra. gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/cover_crops01/sweet clover.htm
  21. Westcott, M.P., L.E. Welty, M.L. Knox and L.S. Prestbye. 1995. Managing alfalfa and berseem clover for forage and plowdown nitrogen in barely rotations. Agron. J. 87:1176-1181 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700060023x

Cited by

  1. Effect of Harvest Stage of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) on the Quality of Round Baled SSH Silage vol.31, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.143
  2. Effects of Harvest Stages and Ensiling Method on Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid Silage vol.31, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.3.295
  3. Effects of Ensiling Method on Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) Silage in Different Locations of SSH Silage vol.32, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.3.245