DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Subjective Response for Impulsive Sound - Focusing on the Construction Noise -

충격성 소음에 대한 주관적 반응 - 건설공사장 소음을 중심으로 -

  • 김득성 (서울시립대학교 대학원 환경공학과) ;
  • 전형준 (서울시립대학교 대학원 환경공학과) ;
  • 장서일 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부)
  • Published : 2008.07.20

Abstract

This research presents a laboratory study on subjective response of impulsive sound caused by construction site (breaker and blasting). The sources are sampled from outdoor noise and their levels range from 40 to 75 dBA at the interval of 5 dBA. The noise unit is based on A-weighted sound exposure level(ASEL; $L_{AE}$). To make equal ASEL of listening level, finite impulse response(FIR) filter is applied to the originally sampled source to include the effect of propagation attenuation. Sixty-three subjects, forty-two males and twenty-one female, between 18 and 29 years of age, participated in the experiment. The evaluation method of jury test adopted a semantic difference method(SDM). In the test results for impulsive noise, the subjective response of blasting noise was higher than that of breaker noise. The result of %HA that has been combined responses of the three methods except for pink-noise was executed by regression analysis and was shown as the following equation.: $%HA=746.53/(1+{\exp} (L_{AE}-93.3))+0.34$.

Keywords

References

  1. Karl, D. K., 1994, 'The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise - Physiology, Psychology, and Public Health', Academic Press, p. 14
  2. John, E. K. F., 1990, 'Sound Analysis and Noise Control', Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 208-209
  3. Jung. I. R., 2002, 'Noise.Vibration', ShinKwangPub, p. 90
  4. Miedema, H. M. E. and Oudshoorn C. G. M., 2001, 'Annoyance from Transportation Noise : Relationships with Exposure Metrics DNL and DENL and Their Confidence Intervals', Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 109, No. 4, p. 414
  5. Vos, J. and Geurtsen, F. W. M., 2003, 'On the Assessment of Shooting Sounds : Loudness-level Weightings Versus A- and C-weighted Sound Exposure Levels(L)', J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 1729-1732 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1608961
  6. Noise Advisory Council, 1978, 'A Guide to Measurement and Prediction of The Equivalent Continuous Sound Level', HMSO, London, p. 4
  7. Nelson, P. M., 1987, 'Transportation Noise Reference Book', Butterworths, pp. 2/16-2/17
  8. Izumi, K., 1986, 'On the Measurement of Annoyance in the Laboratory - 5 Case Studies to Validate the Simulated Environment Method-' Technical Report of Noise, the Acoustical Society of Japan, N86-10-2, pp. 1-12
  9. Schultz, T. J., 1978, 'Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance', J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 377-405 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382013
  10. ISO 9613-1, 1993, 'Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors - Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere'
  11. ISO 9613-2, 1996, 'Acoustics - Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors - General Method of Calculation'
  12. Smith, S. W., 1997, 'The Scientist & Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing(1st Ed.)', California Technical Pub.
  13. AES20-1996, 1996, 'AES Recommended Practice for Professional Audio - Subjective Evaluation of Loudspeakers', Audio Engineering Society Standard, New York
  14. Otto, N. and Amman, S., et al., 1999, 'Guidelines for Jury Evaluations of Automotive Sounds', SAE 1999-01-1822, SAE Noise and Vibration Conference, May 1999, Traverse City, MI, USA
  15. Kim, D. S., Chang, S. I., Kim, D. J. and Lee, Y. S., 2007, 'Comparison of a Hearing Threshold Level Using a Headphone', Proceedings of the KSNVE Annual Autumn Conference, KSNVE 07A-28-25
  16. Beranek, L. L., 1989, 'Balanced Noisecriterion(NCB) Curves', J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 650-664 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398243
  17. Kim, D. S., Chang, S. I., Chun, H. J. and Lee, Y.-S., 2007, 'Comparison of Subjective Response on Impulsive Noise by Sex-focusing on the Leisure Shooting Sound-', KESS