DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detailed Analysis of NO Formation Routes with Strain Rate in H2/Air Nonpremixed Flames

H2/Air 비예혼합화염의 화염신장율에 따른 NO 생성경로의 상세해석

  • Published : 2008.08.01

Abstract

Detailed analysis of NO formation routes and its contributions with strain rate in hydrogen/air flames were numerically investigated. LiG detailed reaction mechanism has been used for calculation, which is compared with experimental data in literature. It shows good agreement with experiment for both temperature and NO mole fraction. Three routes have been found important for NO formation in hydrogen flames. These are the Thermal route, NNH route and $N_2O$ route. Strain rate were varied to discuss the $EI_{NO}$ reduction trend in hydrogen nonpremixed flames, which are analyzed by each NO formation routes. As a result, as the strain rate increase, $EI_{NO}$ decrease sharply until strain rate $100s^{-1}$ and decrease slowly until strain rate $310s^{-1}$ again, after that $EI_{NO}$ keeps nearly constant. It can be identified that $EI_{NO}$ trend with the strain rate is well explained by a combination of variation of production rate of above Thermal, NNH and $N_2O$ route. Also result of Thermal-Mech. that includes only thermal NO reaction is compared with those of Full-Mech. As a result, It can be identified that there was difference between the two results of calculation. It is attributed to result that Thermal-mech did not consider contributions of NNH and $N_2O$ route. From these result, we can conclude that NOx emission characteristics of hydrogen nonpremixed flames should consider contributions of above three routes simultaneously.

Keywords

References

  1. Peters, N., Donnerhack, S., 1981, “Structure and Similarity of Nitric Oxide Production in Turbulent Diffusion Flames,” Proc Combust Inst, Vol. 18, pp. 33-42
  2. Drake, M. C., Blint, R. J., 1991, “Relative Importance of Nitric Oxide Formation Mechanisms in Laminar Opposed-flow Diffusion Flames,” Combust Flame, Vol. 83, pp.185-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(91)90212-T
  3. Chen, R. H., Driscoll, J. F., 1990, “Nitric Oxide Levels of Jet Diffusion Flames : Effects of Coaxial Air and Other Mixing Parameters,” Proc. Combust Inst, Vol. 23, pp.281-8
  4. Lee, C. E., Hwang, C. H., Lee, S. R., 2007, “The Effect of Turbulence Intensity of Ambient Air Flow on NOx Emissions in H2/air Nonpremixed Jet Flames,” Proc. Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy
  5. Bozzelli, J. W., Dean, A. M., 1995, “O+NNH : a Possible New Route for NOx Formation in Flames,” Int J Chem Kinet, Vol. 27, pp. 1097-109 https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550271107
  6. Haworth, N. L., Mackie, J. C., Bacskay, G. B., 2003, “An Ab Initio Quantum Chemical and Kinetic Study of the NNH+O Reaction Potential Energy Surface: How Important is This Route to NO in Combustion?,” J Phys Chem A, Vol. 107, pp. 6792-803 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034421p
  7. Konnov, A. A., De Ruyck, J., 2001, “Temperaturedependent Rate Constant for the Reaction NNH+O$\rightarrow$ NH+,” Combust Flame, Vol. 125, pp. 1258-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00250-4
  8. Kee, R. J., Miller, J. A., Evans, G. H. and Dixon-Lewis, G., 1988, “A Computational Model of the Structure and Extinction of Strained, Opposed Flow, Premixed Methane-Air Flame,” Proc. Combustion Inst., Vol. 22, pp. 1479-1494
  9. Lutz, R. J., Dixon-Lewis, G., Warnatz, J., Coltrin, M. E. and Miller, J. A., 1994, “A Fortran Program for Computing Opposed-Flow Diffusion Flames,” SAND 96-8243
  10. Tien, C. L., 1968, "Thermal Radiation Properties of Gases", Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 5, pp. 253-32
  11. Ju, Y., Guo, H., Maruta, K. and Liu, F., 1997, “On the Extinction Limit and Flammability Limit of Nonadiabatic Stretched Methane-Air Premixed Flames,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 342, pp. 315-334 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112097005636
  12. Martin, S., Kjell, E.R., 2007, “A study of NOx Formation in Hydrogen Flames,” International J of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32, pp. 3572-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.038
  13. Li, J., Zhao, Z., Kazakov, A., Dryer FL, 2004, “An Updated Comprehensive Kinetic Model of Hydrogen,” Int J Chem Kinet Vol. 36, pp. 566-75 https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20026
  14. Glaborg, P., Alzueta, M.U., Dam-Johansen, K., Miller, J.A., 1998, “Kenitic Modeling of Hydrocarbon/nitric Oxide Interactions in a Flow Reactor,” Combust Flame Vol. 115, pp. 1-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00359-3
  15. Turanyi, T., Kinalc Homepage, http://www.chem-.leeds.ac.uk/Combustion/kinalc.html
  16. Lutz, A. E., Kee, R. J., Grcar, J. F. and Rupley, F. M.,1997, “OPPDIF: A Fortran Program for Computing Opposed-Flow Diffusion Flames,” SAND 96-8243
  17. Kee, R. J., Rupley, F. M. and Miller, J. A., 1989, “Chemkin-Ⅱ: A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics,” SAND89-8009B
  18. Kee, R. J., Dixon-Lewis, Warnatz, G. J., Coltrin, M. E. and Miller, J. A., 1994, “A Fortran Computer Code Package for the Evaluation of Gas-Phase Multi-Component Transport,” SAND86-8246
  19. Takeno, T. and Nishioka, M., 1993, “Species Conservation and Emission Indices for Flames Described by Similarity Solutions,” Comb. Flame, Vol. 92, pp. 465-448 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(93)90157-X
  20. Rortveit, G, J., Hustad, J. E., Li, S. C., Williams , F. A., 2002, “Effects of Diluents on NOx Formation in Hydrogen Counterflow Flames”, Combustion and Flames, Vol. 130, pp. 48-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00362-0