Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.136-146
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지

우리나라 남성 흡연자의 금연의향 담배가격 분석

Analysis of Willingness-to-Quit Cigarette Price among Korean Male Adults

  • 정우진 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 이선미 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 신가영 (연세대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 임승지 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 조경숙 (보건복지부 연금정책관실)
  • Chung, Woo-Jin (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Mi (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shin, Ka-Young (Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lim, Seung-Ji (Department of Public Health, Yonsei University Graduate School) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Sook (National Pension Bureau, Ministry of Health & Welfare)
  • 발행 : 2008.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to estimate the willingness to quit cigarette price among Korean male adults, and to examine the factors affecting the willingness to quit cigarette price. Methods : The data was collected by a random digit dial telephone survey. 702 samples were analyzed by using t-tests, ANOVA and OLS regression analysis. To estimate the willingness to quit cigarette price, smokers were asked dichotomous questions with open-ended follow-up and the starting point of the price was randomized by one of 5 bid prices elicited from a pilot study. Results : The mean of the willingness to quit cigarette price was 4,287 Won per package, which was about 2,000 Won higher than the mean of the actual price the smokers now paid. About 41% of respondents were willing to quit smoking if the price of cigarette would be increased by 3,000 Won, and if the price would be increased by 20,000 Won, all respondents were willing to quit smoking. The factors associated with the willingness to quit cigarette price were the place of residence, the amount of smoking and the degree of exposure to smoking through the mass media. Conclusions : The results showed that to get people to quit smoking, increasing the cigarette price would obviously be effective and much higher prices have a greater effect. Furthermore, to enlarge the effect of increased cigarette prices, providing more cessation programs to small towns, reducing the amount of smoking and decreasing or prohibiting advertisements of cigarettes and smoking in the mass media will be efficient.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho KS. Tobacco Control Policy of the Republic of Korea 2005. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare (KR); 2006
  2. OECD. OECD Health Data 2007: Statistics and Indicators for 30 Countries. Paris: OECD; 2007
  3. Siahpush M, Mcneill A, Borland R, Fong GT. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006; 15 suppl 3: iii71-75
  4. Haukkala A, Laaksonen M, Uutela A. Smokers who do not want to quit- is consonant smoking related to lifestyle and socioeconomic factors? Scand J Public Health 2001; 29(3): 226-232
  5. Fiore MC, Baily WC, Cohen SJ, Dorfman SF, Goldstein MG, Gritz ER, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2000
  6. Kim WN, Lee JS, Kim YJ, Chung SM, Lee SH. A Study of the Effectiveness of Tobacco Control Policy. Seoul: Korea University, Management Center for Health Promotion; 2005. (Korean)
  7. Song KY, Nam JJ, Choi JS, Kim TJ. 1992 National Health and Health Behavioral Pattern Survey. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 1993. (Korean)
  8. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The Transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12(1): 38-48 https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
  9. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51(3): 390-395 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390
  10. Hyun HJ. A Study on the intention of smoking cessation behavior and itçs determinants based on the theory of planned behavior. J Korean Soc School Health 1998; 11(2): 217-228. (Korean)
  11. Ajzen I, Brown TC, Carvayal F. Explaining the discrepancy between intention and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Per Soc Psychol Bull 2004; 30(9): 1108-1121 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264079
  12. Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Lee JR, Lee JM, Lee JH, Park EC, et al. The relationship between tobacco price rises and willingness to quit smoking among university students. Korean J Epidemiol 2003; 25(5): 76-83. (Korean)
  13. Lee BG, Nam CH, Wie GB, Lim SK, Kim GY, Suh IS, et al. A study on the smoking status and It's related factors of community people. J Health Welfare 1997; 1: 59-80. (Korean)
  14. Lee SY, Lee SW. A Study on the factors influencing smoking behavior in Korea. J Korean Soc Health Stat 2000; 25(2): 41-50. (Korean)
  15. Lee KS, Lee JW, Lee WC, Meng KH, Yang SI, Kim DS, et al. The factors associated with relapse of smoking in male workers of an eletronics industries. Korean J Occup Health 2003; 42(2): 39-48. (Korean)
  16. Hyland A, Li Qiang, Bauer JE, Giovino GA, Steger C, Cummings KM. Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed for 13 years. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6 (Suppl 3): S363-369 https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200412331320761
  17. Khuder SA, Dayal HH, Mutgi AB. Age at smoking onset and its effect on smoking cesstion. Addict Behav 1999; 24(5): 673-677 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00113-0
  18. Kim YI, Lee JS. Tobacco Price and Health Promotion: Symposium on the Health Promotion and Smoking Cessation. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2003. (Korean)
  19. World Bank. Curbing the Epidemic : Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington, DC: World Bank Publication; 1999
  20. WHO. Subjects of Possible Protocols and Their Relation to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. First Meeting of the Working Group on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Provisional Agenda Item(A/FCTC/WGI/33 September. 1999). Geneva: WHO; 1999. [cited 2007 Jun 16]. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/gb/fctc/PDF/wg1/ elt3.pdf
  21. Gallup Korea. Smoking Prevalence Report. Seoul: Gallup Korea; 2006. (Korean)
  22. Meyerhoff J. Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: Can attitudes tell us more? J Environ Plan and Manage 2006; 49(2): 209-226 https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500507959
  23. van den Berg B, Bleichrodt H, Eeckhoudt L. The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Econ 2005; 14(4): 363-376 https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.980
  24. Jan MS, Fu TT, Huang CL. Willingness to pay for low-lung-cancer-risk cigarettes in Taiwan. Health Econ 2005; 14(1): 55-67 https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.894
  25. Viscusi WK. Do smokers underestimate risks? J Polit Econo 1990; 98(6): 1253-1269 https://doi.org/10.1086/261733
  26. Lee SJ, Neumann PJ, Churchill WH, Cannon ME, Weinstein MC, Johannesson M. Patients' willingness to pay for autologous blood donation. Health Policy 1997; 40(1): 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(96)00879-2
  27. Ryan M, Ratcliffe J, Tcker T. Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(3): 371-380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00154-2
  28. Kim JD, Lee DS, Cho MK. The estimation of willing to pay using contingent valuation method. Rev indust manage 2002; 15(1): 173-191. (Korean)
  29. Shin YC. An Estimation on the benefit of environmental quality improvement by using CVM with dichotomous choice with a followup elicitation method. Daejin School Bull 1996; 4: 49-71. (Korean)
  30. Busch S, Falba T, Duchovny N, Jofre-Bonet M, OçMalley S. Sindelar J. Value to smokers of improved cessation products: Evidence from a willingness-to-pay survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6(4): 631-639 https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200410001727885
  31. Hammar H, Johansson-stenman O. The value of risk-free cigarettes- do smokers underestimate the risk? Health Econ 2004; 13(1): 59-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.794
  32. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2002; 12(1): 1-36 https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
  33. Wiggers LC, Stalmeier PF, Oort FJ, Smets EM, Legemate DA, de Haes JC. Do patients' preferences predict smoking cessation? Prev Med 2005; 41(2): 667-675 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.009
  34. Ohsfeldt RL, Boyle RG, Capilouti E. Effects of tobacco excise taxes on the use of smokeless tobacco products in the USA. Health Econ 1997; 6(5): 525-531 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199709)6:5<525::AID-HEC300>3.0.CO;2-Y
  35. Chung WJ, Lee SM, Lim SJ, Choi SJ, Shin KY, Ann SJ, Kim JY. A Study of the Effectiveness of Price Policy for Tobacco Control. Seoul: Yonsei University, Management Center for Health Promotion; 2006. (Korean)
  36. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III). Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006. (Korean)
  37. Volzke H, Neuhauser H, Moebus S, Baumert J, Berger K, Stang A, et al. Doring A. Urbanrural disparities in smoking behavior in Germany. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 146 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-146
  38. Korean Association of Smoking and Health. 2007 Report of a Survey of Smoking Status among Korean Adult. Seoul: Korean Association of Smoking and Health; 2007. (Korean)
  39. Seoul City Welfare and Healthy Team. 2005 Report of Health Promotion Program. Seoul: Seoul City; 2006. (Korean)
  40. Cho HJ, Khang YH, Jun HJ, Kawachi I. Marital status and smoking in Korea: The influence of gender and age. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66(3): 609-619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.005