The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences (한국통신학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences (한국통신학회)
권호 표지

DEA Models and Application Procedure for Performance Evaluation on Governmental Funding Projects for IT Small and Medium-sized Enterprises with Exogenously Fixed Variables of Corporate Competency

기업역량을 고려한 외생고정변수를 갖는 IT중소기업 정부자금지원정책 성과평가를 위한 DEA모형 및 활용절차

  • 박성민 (백석대학교 경상학부) ;
  • 김헌 (백석대학교 경상학부)
  • Published : 2008.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) models can be used for performance evaluation on governmental funding projects for IT small and medium-sized enterprises associated with multiple-outputs/multiple-inputs. In order to enhance the accuracy of DEA efficiency scores, DEA models with exogenously fixed variables are required where the corporate competency is taken into account. Additionally, it is necessary to use multiple DEA basic as well as extended models so as to relax the restriction on the performance evaluation to relying on a single DEA model. In this study; 1)a DEA data structure is designed including exogenously fixed variables representing corporate asset, revenue and the number of employees at the point in time that the governmental funding project concerned is initiated; 2)DEA basic as well as extended models are established according to the DEA data structure presented abovementioned; and 3)a case study is illustrated with an empirical testbed dataset. As for the DEA basic models, CCR, BCC, Super-efficiency model are adopted. The DEA extended models are developed based on the models associated with noncontrollable and nondiscretionary variables. In the case study, it is explained a comparison of DEA models and also major numerical outcomes such as efficiency scores, ranks derived from each DEA model are integrated using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) weights. Performance significance with DEA efficiency scores between technical categories are tested based not only on parametric but also nonparametric single-factor analysis of variance method.

Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) 모형은 다수출력/다수입력을 갖는 IT중소기업 정부자금지원정책 성과평가에 활용가능하다. DEA효율성지수의 정확성 제고를 위해 기업역량을 반영한 외생고정변수를 DEA모형에서 고려할 수 있다. 또한, 다수 DEA기본모형과 확장모형을 활용한 성과평가를 시도함으로써, 단일 DEA모형에 의존하는 성과평가의 한계를 완화할 수 있다. 본 연구는, IT중소기업 정부자금지원시점에서의 기업자산, 매출액, 종업원수를 외생고정변수로 갖는; 1)DEA자료구조 정립; 2)DEA기본모형과 확장모형 수립; 3)실증자료를 이용한 사례분석을 예시한다. DEA기본모형으로 CCR, BCC, Super-efficiency모형, DEA확장모형으로 비제어변수(noncontrollable variables), 비자유변수(nondiscretionary variables)를 갖는 모형을 수립한다. DEA모형 비교 및 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) 가중치를 이용한 통합 활용절차가 설명된다. 모수 비모수분산분석에 의한 기술분야별 DEA효율성지수로써의 성과유의차를 판정한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술부(MOST), 2007년도 정부연구개발사업 종합안내서, 과학기술부 과학기술혁신본부, 2007
  2. 과학기술정보통신위원회, 2007년도 정보통신진 흥기금 운용계획안 검토보고서, 2006
  3. 김건위, DEA를 통한 지방행정 정보화, 한국학술 정보(주), 2006
  4. 김세헌, 경영과학개론, 개정판, 영지문화사, 2006
  5. 김재관, 김승권, "DEA-AR 기반의 부동산 가격 평가모형", 주택연구, 제15권, 제1호, pp.29-61, 2007
  6. 박경삼, 김윤태, 정홍식, "DEA 및 DEA윈도우분 석을 이용한 대규모 종합병원의 시대별 경영효율 성 변화분석", 경영학연구, 제34권, 제1호, pp.267-287, 2005
  7. 배영민, 김재희, 김승권, "IDEA를 이용한 탄약중 대의 효율성 평가", IE Interfaces, 제19권, 제4호, pp.291-299, 2006
  8. 손소영, 주용규, "분류모형과 DEA를 이용한 두 뇌한국(BK)21 사업단 효율성 분석", IE Interfaces, 제17권, 제3호, pp.249-260, 2004
  9. 이덕주, 양원모, "DEA/OERA를 이용한 프로야 구 선수들에 대한 성과 측정", IE Interfaces, 제 17권, 제4호, pp.440-449, 2004
  10. 정보통신부(MIC), 2006년도 정보통신부 중소기 업지원사업현황, 정보통신부 보고자료, 2006
  11. 정보통신부(MIC), IT839전략, http://www.mic. go.kr/, 2006
  12. 정보통신부(MIC), IT중소․벤처기업의 건전한 생태계 조성을 위한 IT SMERP 2010 계획 최종 수정본, 정보통신부 정책홍보관리실 보도자료, 2006
  13. 정보통신부(MIC), 과학기술정보통신위원회 보 고자료, 2007
  14. 정보통신부(MIC)․정보통신연구진흥원(IITA), 정보통신진흥기금 성과분석 (기술개발투자사 업), 2006
  15. 정보통신부(MIC)․정보통신연구진흥원(IITA), 2006년도 정보통신진흥기금사업 성과평가 지침, 정보통신진흥기금 평가자문단, 2007
  16. 정보통신부(MIC)․정보통신연구진흥원(IITA), 정보통신진흥기금 성과분석 (IT중소기업기술개 발사업), 2007
  17. 정보통신연구진흥원(IITA), IT신기술개발사업 설문조사서: 1999-2006, 2007
  18. 지유나, 문태희, 손소영, "DEA와 로지스틱회귀 분석을 이용한 정보화촉진기금 융자사업의 효율 성분석", 기술혁신연구, 제12권, 제1호, pp.25-48, 2004
  19. 한국정보통신산업협회 (KAIT), IT중소벤처 생 태계 조성 정책지원 사업보고서, 한국정보통신산 업협회 IT통계정보센터, 2007
  20. 황석원, STEPI 정책연구 2006-12, R&D 프로그 램의 유형별 경제성 평가 방법론 구축: 이론 및 실물옵션을 이용한 경제적 가치 선정의 사례 연 구, 과학기술정책연구원, 2006
  21. 황용수, 황석원, STEPI 정책연구 2004-20, 정부 R&D 성과평가시스템의 진단 및 발전방향, 과학 기술정책연구원, 2005
  22. Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. and Cooper, W. W., "A Note on Returns to Scale in DEA", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.88, No.3, pp.583-585, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00281-9
  23. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, Vol.30, No.9, pp.1078-1092, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  24. Banker, R. D., Conrad, R. F. and Strauss, R. P., "A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production", Management Science, Vol.32, No.1, pp.30-44, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.1.30
  25. Banker, R. D. and Morey, R., "The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, Vol.32, No.12, pp.1613-1627, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.12.1613
  26. Banker, R. D. and Morey, R., "Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs", Operations Research, Vol.34, No.4, pp.513-521, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.4.513
  27. Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J. and Reagan, B., "An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District", Management Science, Vol.28, No.12, pp.1355-1367, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1355
  28. Callen, J. L., "Data Envelopment Analysis: Partial Survey and Applications for Management Accounting", Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol.3, Fall, pp.35-56, 1991
  29. Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W. and Golany, B., "A Developmental Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the US Air Forces", In Thompson, R. G. and Thrall, R. M., Edition, Annals of Operations Research, Vol.2, pp.95-112, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874734
  30. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., "Auditing and Accounting for Program Efficiency and Management Efficiency in Not-for-profit Entities", Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.5, No.1, pp.87-107, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90025-2
  31. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M. and Sun, D. B., "Polyhedral Cone-ratio DEA Models With an Illustrative Application to Large Commercial Banks", Journal of Econometrics, Vol.46, No.1-2, pp.73-91, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X
  32. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E., "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp.429-444, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  33. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E., "Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through", Management Science, Vol.27, No.6, pp.668-697, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.6.668
  34. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K., Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, 2nd ed., New York: Springer, 2007
  35. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J., Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Boston: Springer (Kluwer Academic Publishers), 2004
  36. Frontline Systems, Inc., Premium Solver Platform Version 7.1 for Microsoft Excel, http://www.solver.com/Default.htm, 2007
  37. Gregoriou, G. N. and Zhu, J., Evaluating Hedge Fund and CTA Performance, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005
  38. $Minitab^R$, $Minitab^R$ Release 14.20 StatGuide, State College: Minitab Inc., 2005
  39. Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C., Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999
  40. Parks, R. B., "Technical Efficiency of Public Decision Making Units", Policy Studies Journal, Vol.12, No.2, pp.337-346, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1983.tb00275.x
  41. Seiford, L. M. and Thrall, R. M., "Recent Development in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis", Journal of Econometrics, Vol.46, No.1-2, pp.7-38, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U
  42. Sherman, H. D. and Gold, F., "Bank Branch Operating Efficiency: Evaluation With Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.9, No.2, pp.297-315, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(85)90025-1
  43. Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C. T., Lee, E. and Thrall, R. M., "The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis With Application to Kansas Farming", Journal of Econometrics, Vol.46, No.1-2, pp.93-108, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
  44. Winston, W. L., Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, 4th ed.., Belmont California: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2004
  45. Zhu, J., Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis With Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver, Boston: Springer (Kluwer Academic Publishers), 2003