DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MR fluid damper-based smart damping systems for long steel stay cable under wind load

  • Jung, Hyung-Jo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jang, Ji-Eun (University of California) ;
  • Choi, Kang-Min (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Heon-Jae (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2007.06.16
  • Accepted : 2007.11.15
  • Published : 2008.09.25

Abstract

Long steel stay cables, which are mainly used in cable-stayed bridges, are easy to vibrate because of their low inherent damping characteristics. A lot of methods for vibration reduction of stay cables have been developed, and several techniques of them have been implemented to real structures, though each has its limitations. Recently, it was reported that smart (i.e. semi-active) dampers can potentially achieve performance levels nearly the same as comparable active devices with few of the detractions. Some numerical and experimental studies on the application of smart damping systems employing an MR fluid damper, which is one of the most promising smart dampers, to a stay cable were carried out; however, most of the previous studies considered only one specific control algorithm in which they are interested. In this study, the performance verification of MR fluid damper-based smart damping systems for mitigating vibration of stay cables by considering the four commonly used semi-active control algorithms, such as the control algorithm based on Lyapunov stability theory, the maximum energy dissipation algorithm, the modulated homogeneous friction algorithm and the clipped-optimal control algorithm, is systematically carried out to find the most appropriate control strategy for the cable-damper system.

Keywords

References

  1. Burl, J. B. (1999), Linear Optimal Control, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
  2. Christenson, R. E. (2001), "Semiactive control of civil structures for natural hazard mitigation: analytical and experimental studies", Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
  3. Carlson, J. D., The promise of controllable fluids, Proceeding of Actuator 94, AXON Technologies Consult GmbH, 266-270.
  4. Cho, S. W., Jung, H. J. and Lee, I. W. (2005), "Smart passive system based on magnetorheological damper", Smart Mater. Struct., 14, 707-714. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/4/029
  5. Choi, K. M., Jung, H. J., Cho, S. W. and Lee, I. W. (2007a), "Application of smart passive damping system using MR damper to highway bridge structure", J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 21, 870-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027060
  6. Choi, K. M., Lee, H. J., Cho, S. W. and Lee, I. W. (2007b), "Modified energy dissipation algorithm for seismic structures using magnetorheological damper", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 11(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823855
  7. Dyke, S. J., Spencer, Jr., B. F., Sain, M. K. and Carlson, J. D. (1996), "Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction", Smart Mater. Struct., 5, 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006
  8. Fu, Y., Dyke, S. J. and Caicedo, J. M. (1999), "Seismic response control using smart dampers", Proceeding of the 1999 American Control Conference, San Diego, California, June 2-4.
  9. Inaudi, J. A. (1997), "Modulated homogeneous friction: a semi-active damping strategy", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199703)26:3<361::AID-EQE648>3.0.CO;2-M
  10. Irvine, H. M. (1981), Cable Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  11. Jansen, L. M. and Dyke, S. J. (2000), "Semiactive control strategies for MR dampers: comparative study", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(8), 795-803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(795)
  12. Johnson, E. A., Baker, G. A., Spencer, Jr. B. F. and Fujino, Y. (2000), "Mitigating stay cable oscillation using semiactive damping, Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways", Proceedings of SPIE, 3988, 207-216.
  13. Johnson, E. A., Christenson, R. E. and Spencer, Jr., B. F. (2003), "Semiactive damping of cables with sag", Computer-aided Civil and Inf. Eng., 18(2), 132-146.
  14. Jung, H. J., Choi, K. M., Park, K. S. and Cho, S. W. (2007), "Seismic protection of base isolated structures using smart passive control system", Smart Struct. Sys., 3(3), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2007.3.3.385
  15. Leitmann, G. (1994), "Semiactive control for vibration attenuation", J. Intell. Mater. Sys. Struct., 5, 841-846. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9400500616
  16. McClamroch, N. H. and Gavin, H. P. (1995), "Closed loop structural control using electrorheological damper", Proceeding of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, 4173-4177.
  17. Ni, Y. Q., Chen, Y., Ko, J. M. and Cao, D. Q., "Neuro-control of cable vibration using semi-active magnetorheological dampers", Eng. Struct., 24(3), 295-307.
  18. Spencer, Jr., B. F., Dyke, S. J., Sain, M. K. and Carlson, D. J. (1997), "Phenomenological model of magnetorheological damper", J. Eng., ASCE, 123(3), 230-238.
  19. Terasawa, T. and Sakai, C. (2004), "Adaptive identification of MR damper for vibration control", Proceedings of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2297-2303.
  20. Yang, J. N., Agrawal, A. K., Samali, B. and Wu, J. C. (2004), "Benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 130(4), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(437)

Cited by

  1. Semi-active damping with negative stiffness for multi-mode cable vibration mitigation: approximate collocated control solution vol.24, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115015
  2. Experimental Investigation of MR Damper-based Semiactive Control Algorithms for Full-scale Five-story Steel Frame Building vol.21, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X10374162
  3. The role of negative stiffness in semi-active control of magneto-rheological dampers vol.18, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.371
  4. Clipped viscous damping with negative stiffness for semi-active cable damping vol.20, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045007
  5. Shaking table testing of a steel frame structure equipped with semi-active MR dampers: comparison of control algorithms vol.15, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.4.963
  6. Amplitude and frequency independent cable damping of Sutong Bridge and Russky Bridge by magnetorheological dampers vol.22, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1671
  7. Experimental Issues in Testing a Semiactive Technique to Control Earthquake Induced Vibration vol.2014, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/535434
  8. Numerical investigation of an MR damper-based smart passive control system for mitigating vibration of stay cables vol.37, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.4.443
  9. A multi-functional cable-damper system for vibration mitigation, tension estimation and energy harvesting vol.7, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.5.379
  10. Adaptive MR damper cable control system based on piezoelectric power harvesting vol.10, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.1.033
  11. Semi-active control on long-span reticulated steel structures using MR dampers under multi-dimensional earthquake excitations vol.10, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.6.557
  12. Vibration control of a stay cable with a rotary electromagnetic inertial mass damper vol.23, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.6.627