Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of steel moment frames considering progressive collapse

  • Kim, Jinkoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Park, Junhee (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2007.05.15
  • Accepted : 2008.02.04
  • Published : 2008.02.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study the progressive collapse potential of three- and nine-story special steel moment frames designed in accordance with current design code was evaluated by nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. It was observed that the model structures had high potential for progressive collapse when a first story column was suddenly removed. Then the size of beams required to satisfy the failure criteria for progressive collapse was obtained by the virtual work method; i.e., using the equilibrium of the external work done by gravity load due to loss of a column and the internal work done by plastic rotation of beams. According to the nonlinear dynamic analysis results, the model structures designed only for normal load turned out to have strong potential for progressive collapse whereas the structures designed by plastic design concept for progressive collapse satisfied the failure criterion recommended by the GSA guideline.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Science & Engineering Foundation

References

  1. ACI 318 (2002), "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02)", American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan
  2. AISC (2005), "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois
  3. ASCE7-05 (2005), "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures", American Society of Civil Engineers, New York
  4. Chopra, A. K. (2001), Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall.
  5. Corley, W. G., Mlakar Sr., P. F., Sozen, M. A., and Thornton, C. H. (1998), "The Oklahoma city bombing: summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation", J. Performance Constr Facilities, 12(3), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1998)12:3(100)
  6. Crawford, J. E. (2002), "Retrofit methods to mitigate progressive collapse, the multihazard mitigation council of the national institute of building sciences", Report on the National Workshop and Recommendations for Future Effort.
  7. Dusenberry, D. O. and Hamburger, R. O. (2006) "Practical means for energy-based analyses of disproportionate collapse potential", ASCE J Performance of Constr. Facilities, 20(4), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(336)
  8. Eurocode 1 (2002), "Actions on structures", European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
  9. FEMA (1997), "NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings", FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  10. FEMA (2006), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  11. GSA (2003), "Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects", The U.S. General Services Administration
  12. Hayes Jr., J. R, Woodson, S. C., Pekelnicky, R. G., Poland, C. D., Corley, W. G., Sozen, M. (2005), "Can strengthening for earthquake improve blast and progressive collapse resistance?", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 131(8), 1157-1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1157)
  13. ICC (2006), "International Building Code," International Code Council, Falls Church, Virginia
  14. Kaewkulchai G. and Williamson E. B. (2003), "Dynamic behavior of planar frames during progressive collapse", 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference
  15. Longinow, A. and Mniszewski, K. R. (1996), "Protecting buildings against vehicle bomb attacks", Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 1(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1996)1:1(51)
  16. Marjanishvili, S. M. (2004), "Progressive analysis procedure for progressive collapse", J. Performance Constr. Facilities, 79-85.
  17. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L (2006), "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation", User Command-Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California.
  18. Moy, S. S. J. (1981), Plastic Methods for Steel and Concrete Structures, The Macmillan Press, LTD
  19. Murakami, Y, Fushimi, M., and Suzuki, H. (2004) "Thermal deformation analysis of high-rise steel buildings" Proceedings of the CTBUH Seoul International Conference on Tall Buildings, Oct. Seoul, Korea.
  20. National Building Code of Canada (1995), National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  21. National Institute of Standard and Technology (2006), Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings (Draft),
  22. Neuenhofer A. and Filippou F.C. (1997), "Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite elements", ASCE J. Struct Eng, 123(7), July, 958-966. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:7(958)
  23. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)-DoD (2005), "Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse", Department of Defense, USA
  24. Suzuki, I., Wada, A., Ohi, K., Sakumoto, Y., Fusimi, M. and Kamura, H. (2003), "Study on high-rise steel building structure that excels in redundancy, Part II evaluation of redundancy considering heat induced by fire and loss of vertical load resistant members", Proc. CIB-CTBUH International Conf. on Tall Buildings, 251-259
  25. Wada, A., Ohi, K., Suzuki, H., Sakumoto, Y., Fushimi, M., Kamura, H., Murakami, Y., and Sasaki, M. (2004) "A study on the collapse control design method for high-rise steel buildings", Proceedings of the CTBUH Seoul International Conference on Tall Buildings, Oct., Seoul, Korea.
  26. Weaver, W. and Gere, J. M. (1990), Matrix Analysis of Framed Structures, 3rd edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.

Cited by

  1. Technical Note: Analytical Evaluation of the Vulnerability of Framed Tall Buildings with Steel Plate Shear Wall to Progressive Collapse vol.14, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0044-z
  2. Progressive collapse resisting capacity of tube-type structures 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.512
  3. Collapse resistance of unreinforced steel moment connections vol.21, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.636
  4. Experimental evaluation on the seismic performance of steel knee braced frame structures with energy dissipation mechanism vol.11, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.1.077
  5. Design guides to resist progressive collapse for steel structures vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.357
  6. Collapse-resistant performance of RC beam-column sub-assemblages with varied section depth and stirrup spacing vol.24, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1199
  7. Progressive collapse resisting capacity of braced frames vol.20, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.574
  8. Steel moment frames column loss analysis: The influence of time step size vol.67, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.12.006
  9. FE parametric study of RWS/WUF-B moment connections with elliptically-based beam web openings under monotonic and cyclic loading vol.17, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-6023-7
  10. Analysis of reinforced concrete frames subjected to column loss vol.64, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2012.64.1.21
  11. Additive 2D and 3D performance ratio analysis for steel outrigger alternative design vol.20, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.5.1133
  12. Influence of seismicity level and height of the building on progressive collapse resistance of steel frames vol.26, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1305
  13. Developing a Plastic Hinge Model for RC Beams prone to Progressive Collapse 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0326
  14. An analytical methodology for the dynamic amplification factor in progressive collapse evaluation of building structures vol.37, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.11.001
  15. Catenary action of restrained steel beam against progressive collapse of steel frameworks vol.19, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1037-y
  16. Progressive collapse performance of irregular buildings vol.20, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.575
  17. Design of special truss moment frames considering progressive collapse vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-2013-1
  18. Progressive Collapse of Steel Frames vol.01, pp.03, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2013.13007
  19. Improving seismic performance of framed structures with steel curved dampers vol.130, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.063
  20. Progressive collapse resisting capacity of moment frames with viscous dampers vol.22, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.692
  21. Analytical Study of Seismic Progressive Collapse in a Steel Moment Frame Building vol.446-449, pp.1662-8985, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.446-449.102
  22. Progressive Collapse Research: Current State and Future Needs vol.639-640, pp.1662-8985, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.639-640.3
  23. Experimental Study and Numerical Analysis on the Progressive Collapse Resistance of SCMS pp.2093-6311, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0123-x
  24. Influence of Panel Zone on Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel Structures vol.32, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001152
  25. Nonlinear analysis of 3D reinforced concrete frames: effect of section torsion on the global response vol.36, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.36.4.421
  26. Evaluation of different loading simulation approaches for progressive collapse analysis of regular building frames vol.8, pp.8, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.485620
  27. Evaluation of dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structures considering catenary action vol.30, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.3.253
  28. Mitigation of progressive collapse in steel structures using a new passive connection vol.70, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.4.381
  29. Analysis and Design of Seismic Robustness of FRP-Reinforced Frame based on Interlayer Displacement vol.23, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0999-9
  30. Simplified robustness assessment of steel framed structures under fire-induced column failure vol.35, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.2.199
  31. Progressive collapse of steel-framed gravity buildings under parametric fires vol.36, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.4.383
  32. CASCO: a simulator of load paths in 2D frames during progressive collapse vol.2, pp.9, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03201-3
  33. An Overview of Progressive Collapse Behavior of Steel Beam-to-Column Connections vol.10, pp.17, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176003
  34. Progressive Collapse Performance of Steel Beam-to-Column Connections: Critical Review of Experimental Results vol.15, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836802115010152