DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic influence of different building spacing, height and layout on mean wind and turbulent characteristics within and over urban building arrays

  • Jiang, Dehai (Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University) ;
  • Jiang, Weimei (Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University) ;
  • Liu, Hongnian (Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University) ;
  • Sun, Jianning (Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University)
  • Received : 2007.11.22
  • Accepted : 2008.06.17
  • Published : 2008.08.25

Abstract

Large eddy simulations have been performed within and over different types of urban building arrays. This paper adopted three dimensionless parameters, building frontal area density (${\lambda}_f$) the variation degree of building height (${\sigma}_h$), and the staggered degree of building range ($r_s$), to study the systematic influence of building spacing, height and layout on wind and turbulent characteristics. The following results have been achieved: (1) As ${\lambda}_f$ decrease from 0.25 to 0.18, the mean flow patterns transfer from "skimming" flow to "wake interference" flow, and as ${\lambda}_f$ decrease from 0.06 to 0.04, the mean flow patterns transfer from "wake interference" flow to "isolated roughness" flow. With increasing ${\lambda}_f$, wind velocity within arrays increases, and the vortexes in front of low buildings would break, even disappear, whereas the vortexes in front of tall buildings would strengthen and expand. Tall buildings have greater disturbance on wind than low buildings do. (2) All the wind velocity profiles and the upstream profile converge at the height of 2.5H approximately. The decay of wind velocity within the building canopy was in positive correlation with ${\lambda}_f$ and $r_s$. If the height of building arrays is variable, Macdonald's wind velocity model should be modified through introducing ${\sigma}_h$, because wind velocity decreases at the upper layers of the canopy and increases at the lower layers of the canopy. (3) The maximum of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) always locates at 1.2 times as high as the buildings. TKE within the canopy decreases with increasing ${\lambda}_f$ and $r_s$ but the maximum of TKE are very close though ${\sigma}_h$ varies. (4) Wind velocity profile follows the logarithmic law approximately above the building canopy. The Zero-plane displacement $z_d$ heighten with increasing ${\lambda}_f$, whereas the maximum of and Roughness length $z_0$ occurs when ${\lambda}_f$ is about 0.14. $z_d$ and $z_0$ heighten linearly with ${\sigma}_h$ and $r_s$, If ${\sigma}_h$ is large enough, $z_d$ may become higher than the average height of buildings.

Keywords

References

  1. Belcher, S. E., Jerram, N. and Hunt, J. C. R. (2003), "Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements", J. Fluid Mech., 488, 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003005019
  2. Cheng, H. and Castro, I. (2002), "Near wall flow over urban-like roughness", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 104, 229-259 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060103448
  3. Cheng, Y., Lien, F. S., Yee, E. and Sinclair, R. (2003), "A comparison of large eddy simulations with a standard $k-\varepsilon$ Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes Model for the prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow over a matrix of cubes", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91, 1301-1328.
  4. Chu, A. K. M., Kwok, R. C. W. and Yu, K. N. (2005), "Study of pollution dispersion in urban areas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and geographic information system (GIS)", Envir. Mod. And Sofew. 20, 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(04)00127-6
  5. Coceal. O. and Belcher, S. E. (2004), "A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 130, 1349-1372. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.40
  6. Coceal. O. and Belcher, S. E. (2005), "Mean winds through an inhomogeneous urban canopy", Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 115, 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-1591-4
  7. Coceal. O., Thomas, Y. G., Castro, I. P. and Belcher, S. E. (2006), "Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urban-like cubical obstacles", Boundary-layer Meteorol. 121, 491-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9076-2
  8. Cionco, R. M. (1972), "A wind-profile index for canopy flow", Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 3, 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033923
  9. Davidson, M. J., Snyder, W. H., Lawson, R. E. and Hunt, J. C. R. (1996), "Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles", Atmos. Environ., 22, 3715-3731.
  10. Deardorff, J. W. (1980), "Stratocumulus-topped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 18, 495-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119502
  11. Duijm, N. J. (1999), "Estimates of roughness parameters for arrays of obstacles", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 91, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001794831176
  12. Ehrhard, J. and Moussiopoulos, N. (2000), "On a new nonlinear turbulence model for simulating flows around building-shaped structures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 88, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00026-X
  13. Golaz, J. C., Wang, S. Doyle, J. D. and Schimdt, J. (2005), "Coamps-LES: model evaluation and analysis of second-and third-moment vertical velocity budgets", Bound-Layer Meteorol., 116, 487-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-7300-5
  14. Grimmond, C. S. B. and Oke, T. R. (1999), "Aerodynamics properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form", J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 1262-1292. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1262:APOUAD>2.0.CO;2
  15. Hanna, S. R., Tehranian, S., Carissimo, B., Macdonald, R. W. and Lohner, R. (2002), "Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays", Atmos. Environ., 36, 5067-5079. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00566-6
  16. Hunter, L. J., Johnson, G. T. and Watson, I. D. (1992), "An investigation of three-dimensional characteristics of flow regimes within the urban canyon", Atmos. Environ., 20, 425-432.
  17. Iyengar, A. K. S. and Farell, C. (2001), "Experimental issues in atmospheric boundary layer simulations: Roughness length and integral length scale determination", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 89, 1059-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00099-X
  18. Kanda, M., Moriwaki, R. and Kasamatsu, F. (2004), "Large-eddy simulation of turbulent organized structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 112, 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000027909.40439.7c
  19. Lien, F. S. and Yee, E. (2004), "Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-D building array, Part I: A high-resolution reynolds-averaged navier-stokes approach", Boundary-Layer Meorol., 112, 427-466. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000030654.15263.35
  20. Lien, F. S., Yee, E. and Cheng, Y. (2004), "Simulation of mean flow and turbulence over a 2D building array using high-resolution CFD and a Distributed Drag Force Approach", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 92, 117-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.10.005
  21. Lien, F. S. and Yee, E. (2005), "Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-D building array, Part III: A distributed drag force approach, its implementation and application", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 114, 287-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-1987-1
  22. Macdonald, R. W., Griffiths, R. F. and Hall, D. J. (1998), "An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays", Atmos. Environ., 32, 1857-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00403-2
  23. Macdonald, R. W., Griffiths, R. F. and Hall, D. J. (1998), "A comparison of results form scaled field and wind tunnel modelling of dispersion in arrays of obstacles", Atmos. Environ., 32, 3845-3862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)80006-X
  24. Macdonald, R. W. (2000), "Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer", Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 97, 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002785830512
  25. Macdonald, R. W., Schofield, S. C. and Slawson, P. R. (2002), "Physical modeling of urban roughness using arrays of regular roughness elements", Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus., 2, 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021392914279
  26. Mavroidis, I. and Griffiths, R. F. (2001), "Local characteristics of atmospheric disperion within building arrays", Atmos. Environ., 35, 2941-2954. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00456-8
  27. Oke, T. R. (1988), "Street design and urban canopy layer climate", Energ. Buildings, 11, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6
  28. Raupach, M. R., Coppin, P. A. and Legg, B. J. (1986), "Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy, Part 1: The turbulence structure", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 35, 21-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117300
  29. Sada, K. and Sato, A. (2002), "Numerical calculation of flow and stack-gas concentration fluctuation around a cubical building", Atmos. Environ., 36, 5527-5534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00668-4
  30. Snyder, W. H. and Castro, I. P. (2002), "The critical Reynolds number for rough-wall boundary layers", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00114-3
  31. Uehara, K., Wakamatsu, S. and Ooka, R. (2003), "Studies on critical reynolds number indices for wind-tunnel experiments on flow within urban areas", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 107, 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022162807729
  32. Yee, E. and Biltoft, C. A. (2004), "Concentration fluctuation measurements in a plume dispersing through a regular array of obstacles", Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 111, 363-415. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000016496.83909.ee
  33. Zhang, N. and Jiang, W. M. (2004), "Numerical method study of how buildings affect the flow characteristics of an urban canopy", Wind Struct., 7, 159-173. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.3.159
  34. Zhang, N. and Jiang, W. M. (2006), "A large eddy simulation on the effect of buildings on urban flows", Wind Struct., 9(1), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2006.9.1.023

Cited by

  1. Turbulence and Air Exchange in a Two-Dimensional Urban Street Canyon Between Gable Roof Buildings 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0324-4
  2. A New Aerodynamic Parametrization for Real Urban Surfaces vol.148, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9818-x
  3. Aerodynamic Properties of Rough Surfaces with High Aspect-Ratio Roughness Elements: Effect of Aspect Ratio and Arrangements vol.163, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0222-1
  4. Impact of Eddy Characteristics on Turbulent Heat and Momentum Fluxes in the Urban Roughness Sublayer vol.164, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0244-3
  5. Estimation of aerodynamic roughness of a harvested Douglas-fir forest using airborne LiDAR vol.136, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.05.007
  6. A method for mapping the turbulence intensity and excess energy available to building mounted wind turbines over a UK City vol.19, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1928
  7. Evaluation of Urban Local-Scale Aerodynamic Parameters: Implications for the Vertical Profile of Wind Speed and for Source Areas vol.164, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0248-z
  8. Building neighborhood emerging properties and their impacts on multi-scale modeling of building energy and airflows vol.91, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.031
  9. On the Mean Flow Behaviour in the Presence of Regional-Scale Surface Roughness Heterogeneity vol.161, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0154-9
  10. Large-eddy simulations of ventilation for thermal comfort — A parametric study of generic urban configurations with perpendicular approaching winds vol.20, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.04.007
  11. Quantitative ventilation assessments of idealized urban canopy layers with various urban layouts and the same building packing density vol.79, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.008
  12. Aerodynamic Parameters of Urban Building Arrays with Random Geometries vol.138, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9551-7
  13. Analysis of airflow over building arrays for assessment of urban wind environment vol.59, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.007
  14. The Effects of Residential Area Building Layout on Outdoor Wind Environment at the Pedestrian Level in Severe Cold Regions of China vol.9, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122310
  15. The predictability of above roof wind resource in the urban roughness sublayer vol.15, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.463
  16. Mapping the wind resource over UK cities vol.55, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.039
  17. The influence of building height variability on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian ventilation in idealized high-rise urban areas vol.56, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.023
  18. Equations for the Drag Force and Aerodynamic Roughness Length of Urban Areas with Random Building Heights vol.145, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9747-0
  19. Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements vol.789, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.687
  20. Aerodynamic Parameters of Regular Arrays of Rectangular Blocks with Various Geometries vol.132, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9403-5
  21. Estimating Aerodynamic Parameters of Urban-Like Surfaces with Heterogeneous Building Heights vol.141, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9640-2
  22. Aerodynamic Parameters of a UK City Derived from Morphological Data vol.146, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9761-2
  23. Determination of aerodynamic parameters of urban surfaces: methods and results revisited vol.122, pp.3-4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1323-8
  24. Large eddy simulations and parameterisation of roughness element orientation and flow direction effects in rough wall boundary layers vol.17, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2016.1215604
  25. Flow Kinematics in Variable-Height Rotating Cylinder Arrays vol.138, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033676
  26. Aerodynamic roughness variation with vegetation: analysis in a suburban neighbourhood and a city park pp.1573-1642, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0710-1
  27. Computational assessment of blockage and wind simulator proximity effects for a new full-scale testing facility vol.13, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.1.021
  28. Large eddy simulation of wind effects on a super-tall building vol.13, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.6.557
  29. Drag forces on sparsely packed cube arrays vol.880, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.726
  30. PIV-based pressure estimation in the canopy of urban-like roughness vol.61, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-2904-1
  31. Urban built context as a passive cooling strategy for buildings in hot climate vol.231, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110606
  32. Spatial characteristics of turbulent organized structures within the roughness sublayer over idealized urban surface with obstacle-height variability vol.21, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09764-4
  33. Flow over closely packed cubical roughness vol.920, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.456
  34. Urban Boundary Layers Over Dense and Tall Canopies vol.181, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00635-z
  35. Nonlinear relationship between urban form and street-level PM2.5 and CO based on mobile measurements and gradient boosting decision tree models vol.205, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108265
  36. Synoptic wind driven ventilation and far field radionuclides dispersion across urban block regions: Effects of street aspect ratios and building array skylines vol.78, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103606