An Experience Needs Analysis on the Rural Amenity Resources of Urbanites

도시민의 농촌어메니티자원 체험욕구 분석

  • Published : 2008.04.30

Abstract

This study intends analyzes the experience urbanites need regarding rural amenities when visiting rural areas for leisure. For this purpose, 18 rural amenities that can be experienced at 65 traditional rural villages and are designated by the rural development administration(RDA) were selected. Based on rural amenity selection, a questionnaire survey was conducted in 10 cities with 1,052 urban residents. The cities were divided into 5 metropolitan cities(Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Kwangju and Daejeon) and 5 small cities in each province(Chuncheon, Suwon, Jeonju, Chungju and Pohang). The study results suggest that of the 18 rural amenities, urbanites want greater experience with landscape resources near water and forests, health resources related to food and traditional resources such as traditional architecture and culture. Those amenities not chosen were animals, famous people and agricultural landscapes. In addition, women indicated more experience needs than men. Specifically, women want to experience the rural amenities dealing with tradition and health. In addition, people under 40 want to experience active program related festivals(events) and arts and crafts, whereas the group over 40 prefers a non-active program, such as observing the rural landscape and planting. College graduates want to experience the landscape while college students prefer arts and crafts and festivals(events). Those with below average salaries want to experience the most rural amenities. There were no differences in experience needs between those surveyed in metropolitan cities and those in small cities. Finally, the people who visited rural areas within the last year want to experience water, plants, agricultural landscape, health and rural life resources more than other groups, and there is correlation between plans to visit rural villages and experience needs. The results of this study provide insightful information for rural planning strategies such as selection of the type of marketing segments.

Keywords

References

  1. 농림부(2003) 우리나라 농촌관광 발전 방향 및 방안
  2. 농촌자원개발연구소(2004) 2004 농촌관광 실태 및 선호도 조사 연구. 수원: 농촌진흥청
  3. 농촌자원개발연구소(2005) 농촌의 다원적 기능 향상을 위한 어메니티 보전 및 자원관리시스템 개발. 수원: 농촌진흥청
  4. 농촌자원개발연구소(2006) 농촌관광 활성화를 위한 농촌관광마을 방문객 선호 및 시장세분화. 수원: 농촌진흥청
  5. 박덕병, 이혜연(2005) 농촌관광 마을별 농촌관광 체험활동 특성에 관한 비교연구: 상응분석을 중심으로. 한국농촌관광학회지 12(1): 141-158
  6. 박창석(2002) 농촌어메니티에 기초한 농촌자원의 중요도 평가 및 순위관계분석. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 37(6): 21-35
  7. 성영신, 고동우, 정준호(1996) 여가경험의 심리적 본질: '재미란 무엇인가'. 소비자학연구 7(2): 35-57
  8. 엄붕훈(2006) 그린투어리즘을 위한 농산어촌 체험마을 현황 분석-농촌관광 인터넷 포탈사이트 분석을 중심으로-.한국농촌계획학회지 12(4): 125-133
  9. 윤유식(2007) 농촌관광마을 방문객 특성 및 선호도 분석. 한국농촌관광학회 동계학술대회 발표자료집: 123-141
  10. 윤희정(2007) 도시민의 농촌지역 여가선택속성 분석. 한국조경학회지 34(6): 66-77
  11. 윤희정, 조순재, 김진선, 강방훈(2006) 농촌어메니티 자원분석을 위한 평가항목 개발에 관한 연구. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 41(2): 93-105
  12. 이경진, 이현희, 송병화(2007) 정부지원 농.산촌마을 체험프로그램 분류기준 및 특성분석. 한국농촌계획학회지 13(3): 73-82
  13. 조순재, 윤희정, 김혜민(2004) CVM을 통한 농촌 어메니티 자원의 보전가치평가. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 39(6): 189-198
  14. 통계청(2006) 가구당 월평균 가계수치
  15. 황길식(2005) 농촌관광체험이 농촌어메니티와 만족도에 미치는 영향. 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  16. Butler, R., C. M. Hall and J. M. Jenkins(1998) Tourism and Recreation in Rural Areas. New York: John Wilky & Sons
  17. Murphy, A. and P. W. Williams(1999) Attracting Japanese tourists into the rural hinterland: implications for rural development and planning. Tourism Management 20: 487-499 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00005-9
  18. Pine II, B. J. and J. H. Gilmore(1999) The Experience Economy. Boston: HBS Press
  19. Roberts, L. and D. Hall(2001) Rural Tourism and Recreation: Principles to Practice. New York: CABI Publishing
  20. Wu, B. and L. A. Cai(2006) Spatial modeling: suburban leisure in Shanghai. Annals of Tourism Research 33(1): 179-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.10.013
  21. http://www.go2vil.org