DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Enzymes and Emulsifiers on the Loaf Volume and Crumb Hardness of Rice Breads

효소제 및 유화제의 첨가가 쌀빵의 부피와 경도에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Myung-Hee (Dept. of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungwon University) ;
  • Chang, Hak-Gil (Dept. of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungwon University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Tack (Dept. of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungwon University)
  • 이명희 (경원대학교 식품생물공학과) ;
  • 장학길 (경원대학교 식품생물공학과) ;
  • 이영택 (경원대학교 식품생물공학과)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

The effects of various enzymes and emulsifiers on the loaf volume and crumb hardness of rice breads were studied. Four different enzymes [fungal ${\alpha}$-amylase (AMYL), maltogenic bacterial ${\alpha}$-amylase (NMYL), glucose oxidases (GO), and xylanase+hemicellulases (PTP)] and four emulsifiers [sorbitan monostearate (SMS), glycerol monostearate (GMS), sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL), and glycerol ester+propylene glycol ester+sucrose ester+sorbitan ester (SP)] were supplemented to rice dough. The addition of AMYL, GO, and GO+AMYL increased loaf volume of rice breads. The highest loaf volume was observed in rice bread supplemented with AMYL. Rice breads supplemented with enzymes firmed at lower rates during storage, and AMYL, NMYL, and GO considerably decreased crumb hardness of rice breads, exhibiting a significant antistaling effect. The addition of emulsifiers produced rice breads with better specific loaf volume and crumb texture, and continuously retarded crumb hardness of rice breads during storage. Especially, rice bread supplemented with SSL demonstrated the highest loaf volume and the lowest crumb hardness during storage.

효소제와 유화제의 첨가가 쌀빵의 품질특성중 빵의 부피와 저장중 경도 변화에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 효소제로는 곰팡이 ${\alpha}$-amylase(AMYL), 세균 ${\alpha}$-amylase(NMYL), glucose oxidase(GO), 그리고 xylanase+hemicellulase (PTP)를 사용하였으며, 유화제로 sorbitan monostearate (SMS), glycerol monostearate(GMS), sodium stearoyl lactylate(SSL), glycerol ester+propylene glycol ester+sucrose ester+sorbitan ester(SP)를 첨가하여 그 효과를 비교하였다. 쌀가루에 AMYL, GO, 그리고 AMYL+GO 효소를 처리한 쌀빵의 비용적이 대조구 쌀빵에 비해 높게 나타났는데, 특히 AMYL을 첨가한 처리구에서 가장 높은 수치를 보여주었다. 쌀빵의 저장 중 경도 변화를 측정하였을 때 AMYL, NMYL, 그리고 GO를 첨가한 처리구에서 3일 경과 후에도 낮은 증가율을 나타내 쌀빵의 노화지연에 긍정적인 효과를 제시해 주었다. 쌀가루에 유화제를 첨가한 쌀빵의 부피는 모든 유화제 처리구가 대조구 쌀빵보다 높게 나타났으며 저장중 경도가 지속적으로 낮았다. 특히 SSL은 쌀빵의 부피 개선과 함께 노화지연의 효과가 가장 높아 쌀빵의 품질 개량을 위해 적용할 수 있는 매우 긍정적인 유화제로 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nishita KD, Roberts RL, Bean MM. 1976. Development of yeast-leavened rice-bread formula. Cereal Chem 53: 626-635
  2. Bean MM, Nishita K. 1985. Rice flour for baking. In Rice Chemistry and Technology. Juliano BO, ed. AACC, St. Paul, MN, USA. p 539
  3. Kang MY, Choi YH, Choi HC. 1997. Effects of gums, fats and glutens adding on processing and quality of milled rice bread. Korean J Food Sci Technol 29: 700-704
  4. McCarthy DF, Gallagher E, Gormley TR, Schober TJ, Arendt EK. 2005. Application of response surface methodology in the development of gluten-free bread. Cereal Chem 82: 609-615 https://doi.org/10.1094/CC-82-0609
  5. Sivaramakrishnan HP, Senge B, Chattopadhyay PK. 2004. Rheological properties of rice dough for making rice bread. J Food Eng 62: 37-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00169-9
  6. Lazaridou A, Duta D, Papageorgiou M, Belc N, Biliaderis CG. 2007. Effects of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality parameters in gluten-free formulations. J Food Eng 79: 1033-1047 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.03.032
  7. Pyler EJ. 1988. Enzymes in baking. In Baking Science and Technology. Sosland Publishing Co., Merriam, USA
  8. Collar C, Bollain C, Angioloni A. 2005. Significance of microbial transglutaminase on the sensory, mechanical and crumb grain pattern of enzyme supplemented fresh pan breads. J Food Eng 70: 479-488 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.047
  9. Caballero PA, Gomez M, Rosell CM. 2007. Improvement of dough rheology, bread quality and bread shelf-life by enzymes combination. J Food Eng 81: 42-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.007
  10. Kulp K. 1993. Enzymes as dough improvers. In Advances in Baking Technology. Camel BS, Stauffer CE, eds. Blackie Academic and Professional, London. p 152-178
  11. Gujral HS, Rosell CM. 2004. Improvement of the breadmaking quality of rice flour by glucose oxidase. Food Res Int 37: 75-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2003.08.001
  12. Stampfli L, Nersten B. 1995. Emulsifiers in bread making. Food Chem 52: 353-360 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)93281-U
  13. Kamel BS, Hoover R. 1992. Production of bread using sodium stearoyl lactylate as a replacement for shortening. Food Res Int 25: 285-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-9969(92)90125-O
  14. Kim JH, Maeda T, Morita N. 2006. Effect of fungal $\alpha$-amylase on the dough properties and bread quality of wheat flour substituted with polished flours. Food Res Int 39: 117-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.06.008
  15. Rouau X, El-Hayek M, Moreau D. 1994. Effect of an enzyme preparation containing pentosanases on the breadmaking quality of flours in relation to changes in pentosan properties. J Cereal Sci 19: 259-272 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1994.1033
  16. Sahlstrom S, Brathen E. 1997. Effects of enzyme preparations for baking, mixing time and resting time on bread quality and bread staling. Food Chem 58: 75-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00216-6
  17. Gujral HS, Haros M, Rosell CM. 2004. Improving the texture and delaying staling in rice flour chapati with hydrocolloids and α-amylase. J Food Eng 65: 89-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.12.007
  18. Billain C, Collar C. 2004. Dough viscoelastic response of hydrocolloid/enzyme/surfactant blends assessed by uniand bi-axial extension measurements. Food Hydrocoll 18: 499-507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2003.08.007
  19. Yllmaki G, Hawrysh ZJ, Hardin RT, Thomson ABR. 1991. Response surface methodology in the development of rice flour yeast breads: sensory evaluation. J Food Sci 56: 751-755 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05374.x
  20. Ribotta PD, Perez GT, Leon AE, Anon MC. 2004. Effect of emulsifier and guar gum on micro structural, rheological and baking performance of frozen bread dough. Food Hydrocoll 18: 305-313 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00086-9

Cited by

  1. Baking Properties of Gluten-free Rice Bread with Different Percentages of Corn Starch and Waxy Corn Starch vol.28, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.4.586
  2. Effect of Rice Flour Prepared with Enzyme Treatment on Quality Characteristics of Rice Cookies vol.42, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.9.1439
  3. Quality Characteristics of Rice Cookies Prepared with Different Amylose Contents vol.40, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.6.832
  4. Quality Characteristics of Pound Cake Containing Angelica gigas NAKAI with Various Levels of Rice Flour vol.28, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2012.28.6.763
  5. Effects of Mixing Speed and Time on the Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Dough and the Baking Properties of Gluten-Free Rice Bread vol.28, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.6.1011
  6. Quality Changes of Steamed Rice Bread with Addition of Active Gluten and Rice Nuruk vol.25, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2012.25.2.253
  7. Effects of Hemicellulase on White Bread Added with Brown Rice Fiber vol.45, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.3.352
  8. Gluten-Free 쌀빵, 시판 중인 쌀빵 및 밀빵의 품질과 소비자 검사 분석 vol.30, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.2.336
  9. 압출성형 공정변수가 갈색거저리 애벌레(mealworm) 첨가 쌀 팽화 스낵의 이화학적 특성에 미치는 영향 vol.49, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2017.49.4.444
  10. Gluten-Free 쌀빵의 제빵 특성에 대한 첨가 수분 온도 영향 vol.30, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.6.1184
  11. 습식 및 건식 쌀가루의 유지 종류 및 첨가 비율에 따른 쌀빵 품질 특성 vol.31, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2018.31.4.511
  12. 식이섬유, 효소 및 달걀 첨가 수준에 따른 쌀빵의 제빵 적성 및 품질 특성 vol.33, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.7318/kjfc/2018.33.6.580
  13. Effects of Emulsifier Additions on the Physical Properties of Extruded Psyllium vol.23, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2019.23.2.118