Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회논문집)

Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Modified Disturbed State Concept Model for Liquefaction Analysis

액상화 해석을 위한 수정교란상태개념 모델 개발

  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, the application of the DSC model to the analysis of liquefaction potential is examined through experimental and analytical investigations. For more realistic description of dynamic responses of saturated sands, the DSC model was modified based on the dynamic effective stress path and excess pore pressure development. Both static and cyclic undrained triaxial tests were performed for sands with different relative densities and confining stresses. Based on test results, a classification of liquefaction phases in terms of the dynamic effective stress path and the excess pore pressure development was proposed and adopted into the modified DSC model. The proposed methods using the original and modified DSC models were compared with examples with different relative densities and confining stresses. Based on the comparisons between the predicted results using the original and modified DSC models and experimental data, the parameters required to define the model were simplified. It was also found that modified model more accurately simulate initial liquefaction and dynamic responses of soil under cyclic undrained triaxial tests.

본 논문에서는 액상화 해석에 관한 DSC 모델을 실험 및 해석적 관점에서 그 적용성을 평가하였다. 포화 사질토의 동적거동을 보다 정확히 예측하기 위해 DSC 모델을 유효응력 경로와 과잉간극수압 발현에 기초하여 수정하였다. 액상화에 대한 동적거동 및 DSC 모델에 대한 매개변수 산정을 위해 정적배수삼축시험과 반복 비배수삼축시험을 상대밀도와 구속응력에 따라 수행하였다. 유효응력 경로와 과잉간극수압의 항으로 액상화 상태를 분류하고 수정된 DSC 모델을 적용시켜 액상화 해석을 수행하였다. 제안된 방법을 토대로 DSC 모델과 제안된 DSC 모델에 대한 액상화 해석을 상대밀도와 구속응력에 따라 비교하였다. 비교 결과 수정 모델은 액상화 시작점 및 동적 거동을 보다 정밀하게 평가하였고, 입력변수의 수가 감소하고 산정방법이 간편해졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Desai, C.S. (1980), 'A general basis for yield, failure and potential functions in plasticity', International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomech, 4, 361-375 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610040406
  2. Desai, C.S. and Ma, Y. (1992), 'Modeling of joints and interfaces using the disturbed state concept', International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomech, 16, 623-653 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610160903
  3. Desai, C.S. and Toth, J. (1996), 'Disturbed state constitutive modeling based on stress-strain and nondestructive behavior', International Journal of Solids and Structure, 33(11), 1619-1650 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00115-8
  4. Desai, C.S. and Rigby, D.B. (1997), 'Cyclic interface and joint shear device including pore water pressure effects', Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(6), 568-579 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(568)
  5. Desai, C.S., Sharma, K.G., Wathugala, G.W. and Rigby, D.B. (1991), 'Implementation of hierarchical single surface $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ models in finite element procedure', International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomech, 15, 649-680 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610150904
  6. Desai, C.S., Basaran, C. and Zhang, W. (1997), 'Numerical algorithms and mesh dependence in the disturbed state concept', International Journal of Numerical Method in Engineering, 40, 3059-3083
  7. Desai, C.S., Park, I.J. and Shao, C. (1998), 'Fundamental yet simplified model for liquefaction instability', International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomech, 22(7), 721-748 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199809)22:9<721::AID-NAG942>3.0.CO;2-F
  8. Drucker, D.C. and Prager, W. (1952), 'Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design', The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Math, 10(2), 157-165
  9. Finn, W.D.L., Lee, K.W. and Martin, G.R. (1977), 'An effective stress model for liquefaction', Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 103(6), 517-533
  10. Iai, S., Matsunaga, Y. and Kameoka, T. (1992), 'Strain space plasticity model for cyclic mobility', International Journal of Japan Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 32(2), 1-15
  11. Katti, D.R. and Desai, C.S. (1994), 'Modeling and testing of cohesive soil using the disturbed state concept', Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 121(1), 43-56
  12. Ladd, R.S. (1978), 'Preparing test specimens using undercompaction', Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 1(1), 16-23 https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J
  13. Pal, S. and Wathugala, G.W. (1999), 'Disturbed state model for sand-geosynthetic interfaces and application to pull-out tests', International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomech, 23(15), 1873-1892 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(19991225)23:15<1873::AID-NAG12>3.0.CO;2-K
  14. Roscoe, K.H., Scofield, A. and Wroth, C.P. (1958), 'On yielding of soils', Geotechnique, 8, 22-53
  15. Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M. and Arango, I. (1983), 'Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data', Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 109(3), 458-482 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458)
  16. Vade, Y.P. and Chern, J.C. (1983), 'Effect of static shear on resistance of liquefaction', Soil and Foundation, 23(1), 47-60 https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.23.47
  17. Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., Andrus, R.D., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J.T., Dobry, R., Finn, W.D.L., Harder, L.F., Hynes, M.E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J.P., Liao, S.S.C., Marcuson III, W.F., Martin, G.R., Mitchell, J.K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M.S., Robertson, P.K., Seed, R.B., Stokoe II, K.H. (2001), 'Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of Soils', Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(10), 817-833 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817)