Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

A CASE REPORT OF THE FACIAL ASYMMETRY BY INFANTILE MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

유아기 악골 수술로 인해 유발된 안면 비대칭 환자에서의 BSSRO를 이용한 안모 교정의 치험례

  • Choi, So-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Geon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, In-Suk (Department of Dentistry and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University)
  • 최소영 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김진욱 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 권대근 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 박인숙 (계명의대 동산의료원 치과 및 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2008.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Facial asymmetry is particularly associated with mandible among other facial bones and it could be either congenital or acquired. Congenital factors are related to Treacher Collin syndrome, Pierre Robin syndrome, hemifacial microsomia and other various syndromes. Acquired factors are such as damaged or diseased growing condyles, hormonal disorder, oral mal-habit, muscular force, tumor, infection and so on. Diagnosis and treatment of facial asymmetry are complicated due to differences in sizes and positions of mandibles. The aspects of facial asymmetry is various and complicated upon each individual. Depending on causes of the facial asymmetry, there also are morphological differences. For such reasons, precise anatomical analysis and diagnosis of the facial asymmetry are essential before any surgical procedure followed by the appropriate treatment plan. This case is regarding a 21-year old patient diagnosed as the facial asymmetry due to an infantile maxillofacial surgery. Employing various morphological evaluations, potential problems during the procedure are predicted beforehand. This case reports a favorable result of sagittal split ramus osteotomy performing the oblique vertical bone cutting in posterior-superior of the mandibular second molar.

Keywords

References

  1. Bell WH : Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities. WB Saunders Company, 844-1013, 1985
  2. Erickson GE : Mandibular asymmetry. J.A.D.A 89 : 1369, 1973
  3. Moskow R, Levine LJ, Marin A : Multifocal eosinophilic granuloma simulating periodontal disease. N.Y. State D.J 37 : 607, 1971
  4. Sleeper EL : Eosinophilic granuloma of bone : Its relationship to Hand-Schuller-Christian and Letter-Siwe disease with emphasis upon oral symptom and findings. Oral Surg 4 : 896, 1952 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(51)90470-7
  5. Soskolne WA, Lustmann J, Azaz B : Histiocytosis X ; Report of six cases initially in the jaws. J Oral Surg 35 : 30, 1977
  6. Nebitt A : Eosinophilic granuloma of maxilla and mandible. Proc Roy Soc Med 48 : 990-991, 1955
  7. Shklar G, Taylor R, Schwartz S : Oral lesions of eosinophilic granuloma. Oral Surg 19 : 613-621, 1965.5. Graver TM : Comment of the editor-in-cheif. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107 : 360, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70088-9
  8. Blevins C, Dahlin DC, Lovestedt SA et al : Oral and dental manifestation of histiocytosis X. Oral Surg 12 : 473, 1959 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(59)90058-1
  9. Hartman KS : Histiocytosis X ; A review of 114 cases with oral involvement. Oral Surg 49 : 38, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90030-4
  10. Berkowitz S : A comparison of treatment results in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate using a conservative approach versus Millard-Latham PSOT procedure. Semin Orthod 2 : 169, 1996
  11. Heidbuchel KL, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Prahl-Andersen B et al : Effects of early treatment on maxillary arch development in BCLP. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26 :140, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80003-6
  12. Graver TM : Comment of the editor-in-chief. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107 : 360, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70088-9
  13. Bill JS, Reuther JF, Dittmann W et al : Sterolithiography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24 : 98, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80869-0
  14. Okumura H, Chen LH, Tsutsumi S et al : Three-dimensional virtual imaging of skeleton and dental morphologic condition for treatment planning in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 : 126, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70208-8
  15. Karas ND, Boyd SB, Sinn DP : Recovery of neurosensory function following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 : 429, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90458-2
  16. Macintosh R : Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus.: A 13 year review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 8 : 151, 1981
  17. Martis C : Complications after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 101, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90320-3
  18. Lee YH, Moon SH : Eosiniphilic granuloma of the mandible. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 14(2) : 88, 1988
  19. Gim HH, Cho BO : The anatomical location of the mandibular canal by computed tomogram. J Kor Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 14(1,2) :135, 1992