Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of Alternative Assessments to Rectify Common Students' Misconceptions: A Case Study of "mini-project" in GCE 'A' Level Physics in a Singapore School

  • Lim, Ai Phing (Millennia Institute, Singapore) ;
  • Yau, Che Ming (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University)
  • Published : 2008.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Students often have tenacious physics misconceptions and many studies were conducted on engendering conceptual change. Correspondingly, there is much literature on alternative assessment and its role in student learning. This is a comparison study on using alternative assessments to improve common students' misconceptions in GCE Advanced Level Physics. This research also aims to affirm alternative assessment as a valid tool for learning and promote its use. This study involved two classes with 24 students each. For four weeks, electromagnetism was taught to students using the same classroom pedagogies but with different assignments. The control group completeda standard drill-and-practice assignment while the experimental group finished an alternative assessment. From the preliminary results, students who undertook the alternative assessment and the traditional assessment both improved, however, the treatment group did not perform statistically significantly better than the control group. The reasons will be discussed and commented and it is expected to have significant improvement on rectifying misconceptionsupon next batch of experimentation groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Berglund, A., Daniels, M., Hedenborg, M., & Tengstrand, A. (1998). Assessment to increase students' creativity: two case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379980230106
  2. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 105-225 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1002&3_2
  3. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-95 https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001069
  4. Klammer, J. (1998). An overview of techniques for identifying, acknowledging and overcoming alternate conceptions in physics education. 1997-98 Klingenstein Project Paper, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 423121)
  5. Kwon, J. S., Lee, Y. J., Beeth, M. E. (2000). The effects of cognitive conflict on students' conceptual change in physics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 443734)
  6. Mills, P. A., Sweeney, W. V., DeMeo, S., Marino, R., & Clarkson, S. (2000). Using poster sessions as an alternative to written examinations - the poster exam. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(9), 1158-1161 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p1158
  7. Moreira, M. (1985). Concept mapping: an alternative strategy for evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(2), 159-168 https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293850100206
  8. Niedderer, H. (1997). Learning process studies in physics: a review of concepts and results. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406171)
  9. Notaros, B. M. (2002). Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1, 684-687
  10. Pearson, G., & Atkinson, D. (1995). Physics in the sonnet style. The Physics Teacher, 33, 577 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344310
  11. Pinkerton, K. D. (1997). Enhancing conceptual learning by understanding levels of language-rich teaching. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406677)
  12. Planinic, M. (2006). Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity and magnetism using the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 74(12), 1143-1148 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2366733
  13. Raduta, C. (2005). General students' misconceptions related to electricity and magnetism. Retrieved Jul 12, 2007, from Cornell University arXiv Web site: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0503132
  14. Ranney, M. (1987). Restructuring conceptions of motion in physics-naive students. Washington, DC: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357965)
  15. Saltman, S. (1994). Assignment: write a chapter of text. The Physics Teacher, 32, 162-163 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343943
  16. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14
  17. Sherin, B. (1999). Common sense clarified: intuitive knowledge and its role in physics expertise. Boston, MA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 444337)
  18. Slater, T. F., Samson, S. L., & Ryan, J. M. (1995). A qualitative and quantitative comparison of the impact of portfolio assessment procedures versus traditional assessment in a college physics course. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391835)
  19. Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board. GCE A Level Higher 2 (H2 Physics syllabus examined in 2008. Retrieved Aug 22, 2008, from Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board Web site: http://www.seab.gov.sg/SEAB/aLevel/syllabus/ 2008_GCE_A_Level_Syllabuses/9745_2008.pdf
  20. Wiggins, G. (2004). Assessment as feedback. Retrieved Sep 15, 2007, from New Horizons for Learning web site: http://www.newhorizons.org/strate gies/assess/wiggins.htm
  21. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Retrieved Feb 1, 2007, from Phi Delta Kappa International Web site: http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/ kbla9810.htm
  22. Wiliam, D., Black, P., Lee, C., & Harrison, C. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11, 49-65 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103257402