Journal of the Korean Geographical Society (대한지리학회지)

The Korean Geographical Society (대한지리학회)
권호 표지

An Estimation on Development Capacity under Urban Growth Management Policies: A Case of Maryland in the U.S.

도시성장관리정책 하에서의 개발용량 추정과 정책적 함의: 미국 매릴랜드 주를 사례로

  • Sohn, Jung-Yul (Department of Geography, College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Knaap, Gerrit (National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland)
  • 손정렬 (서울대학교 사회과학대학 지리학과) ;
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Using MD Property View database on 15 counties in Maryland in the U.S., this study attempts to explore the estimation process on the housing development capacity under the Maryland's urban growth management policy known as the Smart Growth Initiatives. This study also seeks to draw the implications of the estimated development capacity by individual counties on successful implementation of the urban growth management policy. The finding shows that this region has land for residential use enough to accommodate growth for the next 30 years. However, contrary to the goal of the Smart Growth Initiatives, a majority of development capacity is located not only outside the Priority Funding Area designated by the Smart Growth Initiatives but also at counties that are located far away from the major metropolitan area. In addressing this problem, the state does not need to either abolish or immediately expand the Priority Funding Area. Rather, the state requires local governments to include housing elements in their comprehensive planning, to provide periodic estimates on housing and employment capacity, and to establish and manage database on the location and the capacity of developable land.

본 연구는 미국 매릴랜드 주의 15개 카운티를 대상으로 지리정보가 포함된 과세필지 데이터베이스를 이용하여 현재 스마트성장정책으로 알려져 있는 주의 도시성장관리정책 하에서 주택개발용량이 어떻게 산정될 수 있으며 각각의 카운티별로 산정된 개발용량이 성공적인 성장관리정책의 시행에 있어서 가지는 함의는 무엇인지를 규명해 보려 하였다. 연구의 결과 이 지역에는 향후 30년 동안의 성장을 수용할 충분한 주거용 토지가 있었으나 이중 대부분의 개발용량은 주의 스마트성장정책에 의해 설정된 우선투자지역의 외부에 있으며, 스마트성장정책의 목표와는 반대로 주요 대도시권으로부터 떨어진 카운티들에 있었다. 이러한 불균형을 해소하려 주정부가 우선투자지역을 제거하거나 당장 확장할 필요는 없으며 오히려 이는 주정부가 지방정부로 하여금 종합계획에 주택요소를 포함하고, 주택 및 고용용량의 정기적인 추정치를 제공하며, 개발가능토지의 위치와 용량에 대한 자료를 구축 관리케 해야 함을 의미한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강병기.최봉문, 1994, '대지와 가구의 유형에 따른 개발 용량의 추정과 계획적 제어방안에 관한 연구,' 국토계획, 29(1), 57-87
  2. 서울시립대학교 환경공학센터, 1998, 서울도심부 하부기반시설의 수용용량분석
  3. 서울시정개발연구원, 1995, 주택시가지 주거밀도에 관한 연구
  4. 최동호, 1998, 가로망 용량을 고려한 도시개발밀도에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  5. 최막중.김진유, 1999, '기반시설 제약조건하에서의 도시 개발용량과 토지이용밀도,' 국토계획, 34(3), 61-72
  6. 최봉문.강병기, 1990, '가구개발용량의 예측과 조정에 관한 연구,' 국토계획, 25(1), 67-91
  7. Antolihao, L. and van Horen, B., 2005, Building institutional capacity for the upgrading of Barangay Commonwealth in Metro Manila, Housing Studies, 20(6), 873-896 https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500290993
  8. Bramley, G., 1999, Housing market adjustment and land supply constraints, Environment and Planning A, 31(7), 1169-1188 https://doi.org/10.1068/a311169
  9. Clarke, P., 1997, Urban capacity methodologies, Town and Country Planning, 66(9), 233-236
  10. Conder, W.(S.), 2001, Metroscope: linking a land monitoring system to real estate and transportation modeling, in Knaap, G.(ed.), Land Market for Smart Growth, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge
  11. Gunn, S., 2006, The changing meaning of urban capacity: a need to reflect on planning for infrastructure, Town Planning Review, 77(4), 403-421 https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.77.4.3
  12. Hanley, P.F. and Hopkins, L.D., 2007, Do sewer extension plans affect urban development- a multiagent simulation, Environment and Planning B, 34(1), 6-27 https://doi.org/10.1068/b32061
  13. Hopkins, L.D., Xu, X., and Knaap, G.J., 2004, Economies of scale in wastewater treatment and planning for urban growth, Environment and Planning B, 31(6), 879-893 https://doi.org/10.1068/b3123
  14. Howland, M. and Sohn, J., 2007, Has Maryland's priority funding areas initiative constrained the expansion of water and sewer investments-, Land Use Policy, 24(1), 175-186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.008
  15. Kelly, E.D., 1993, Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts, Praeger Press, Westport
  16. Knaap, G.J., 2001, Land Market Monitoring for Smart Growth, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge
  17. Onishi, T., 1994, A capacity approach for sustainable urban development: an empirical study, Regional Studies, 28(1), 39-51 https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348056
  18. Oxley, M, Golland, A., and Weston, R., 2005, Urban residential development, economic viability and urban capacity studies, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(2), 153-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-005-9003-8
  19. Tabors, R.D., Shapiro, M.H., and Rogers, P.P., 1976, Land Use and the Pipe: Planning for Sewerage, Lexington Books, Lexington
  20. Zovanyi, G., 1998, Growth Management for a Sustainable Future: Ecological Sustainability as the New Growth Imperative, Praeger, West Port