DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anterior Interbody Grafting and Instrumentation for Advanced Spondylodiscitis

  • Lim, Jae-Kwan (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Min (Department of Neurosurgery, East-West Neo Medical Center Kyunghee University) ;
  • Jo, Dae-Jean (Department of Neurosurgery, East-West Neo Medical Center Kyunghee University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-One (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine Hallym University)
  • Published : 2008.01.28

Abstract

Objective : To evaluate the surgical outcomes of ventral interbody grafting and anterior or posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of advanced spondylodiscitis with patients who had failed medical management. Methods : A total of 28 patients were evaluated for associated medical illness, detected pathogen, level of involved spine, and perioperative complications. Radiological evaluation including the rate of bony union, segmental Cobb angle, graft- and instrumentation-related complications, and clinical outcomes by mean Frankel scale and VAS score were performed. Results : There are 14 pyogenic spondylodiscitis, 6 postoperative spondylodiscitis, and 8 tuberculous spondylodiscitis. There were 21 males and 7 females. Mean age was 51 years, with a range from 18 to 77. Mean follow-up period was 10.9 months. Associated medical illnesses were 6 diabetes, 3 pulmonary tuberculosis, and 4 chronic liver diseases. Staphylococcus was the most common pathogen isolated (25%), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis was found in 18% of the patients. Operative approaches, either anterior or posterior spinal instrumentation, were done simultaneously or delayed after anterior aggressive debridement, neural decompression, and structural interbody bone grafting. All patients with neurological deficits improved after operation, except only one who died from aggravation as military tuberculosis. Mean Frankel scale was changed from $3.78{\pm}0.78$ preoperatively to $4.78{\pm}0.35$ at final follow up and mean VAS score was improved from $7.43{\pm}0.54$ to $2.07{\pm}1.12$. Solid bone fusion was obtained in all patients except only one patient who died. There was no need for prolongation of duration of antibiotics and no evidence of secondary infection owing to spinal instrumentations. Conclusion : According to these results, debridement and anterior column reconstruction with ventral interbody grafting and instrumentation is effective and safe in patients who had failed medical management and neurological deficits in advanced spondylodiscitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Asamoto S, Doi H, Kobayashi N, Endoh T, Sakagawa H, Iwanaga Y, et al : Spondylodiscitis : diagnosis and treatment. Surg Neurol 64 : 103-108; discussion 108, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2004.11.034
  2. Benli IT, Acaroglu E, Akalin S, Kis M, Duman E, Un A : Anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in tuberculosis spondylitis. Eur Spine J 12 : 224-234, 2003
  3. Benli IT, Kaya A, Acaroglu E : Anterior Instrumentation in Tuberculous Spondylitis : Is it Effective and Safe? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007
  4. Dimar JR, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Hartman MJ, Johnson JR : Treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with anterior debridement and fusion followed by delayed posterior spinal fusion. Spine 29 : 326-332; discussion 332, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000109410.46538.74
  5. Eismont FJ, Bohlman HH, Soni PL, Goldberg VM, Freehafer AA : Pyogenic and fungal vertebral osteomyelitis with paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65 : 19-29, 1983 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198365010-00004
  6. Eysel P, Hopf C, Vogel I, Rompe JD : Primary stable anterior instrumentation or dorsoventral spondylodesis in spondylodiscitis? Results of a comparative study. Eur Spine J 6 : 152-157, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301428
  7. Fayazi AH, Ludwig SC, Dabbah M, Bryan Butler R, Gelb DE : Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine J 4 : 388-395, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.01.004
  8. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ : Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine 25 : 1668-1679, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200007010-00010
  9. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, Pienkowski D : Better treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis using posterior stabilization and titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15 : 149-156; discussion 156, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200204000-00010
  10. Hsieh PC, Wienecke RJ, O'Shaughnessy BA, Koski TR, Ondra SL : Surgical strategies for vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess. Neurosurg Focus 17 : E4, 2004
  11. Jung SW CB, Rhee DY : Surgical treatment of tuberculous spondylitis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 26 : 384-393, 1997
  12. Krodel A, Sturz H : Differentiated surgical and conservative treatment of spondylitis and spondylodiscitis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 127 : 587-596, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1040296
  13. Lehovsky J : Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis/disc infection. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 13 : 59-75, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1053/berh.1999.0006
  14. Levi AD, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK : Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg 86 : 975-980, 1997 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.0975
  15. Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Bullmann V, Hackenberg L, Halm H, Winkelmann W : Titanium cages in the surgical treatment of severe vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Spine J 12 : 606-612, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0614-z
  16. Mann S, Schutze M, Sola S, Piek J : Nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiscitis : clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, and outcome in 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus 17 : E3, 2004
  17. McGuire RA, Eismont FJ : The fate of autogenous bone graft in surgically treated pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Spinal Disord 7 : 206-215, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199407030-00002
  18. Osenbach RK, Hitchon PW, Menezes AH : Diagnosis and management of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Surg Neurol 33 : 266-275, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(90)90047-S
  19. Ozuna RM, Delamarter RB : Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and postsurgical disc space infections. Orthop Clin North Am 27 : 87-94, 1996
  20. Przybylski GJ, Sharan AD : Single-stage autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation in the surgical management of pyogenic discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis. J Neurosurg 94 : 1-7, 2001 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.94.1.0001
  21. Rath SA, Neff U, Schneider O, Richter HP : Neurosurgical management of thoracic and lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis and discitis in adults : a review of 43 consecutive surgically treated patients. Neurosurgery 38 : 926-933, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199605000-00013
  22. Sapico FL : Microbiology and antimicrobial therapy of spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am 27 : 9-13, 1996
  23. Steffen KR, Alireza G, Peter MZ, Madjid S : Monirotiring of blood parameters following anterior cervical fusion. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 92 : 169-174, 2000
  24. Yilmaz C, Selek HY, Gurkan I, Erdemli B, Korkusuz Z : Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 1261-1267, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199909000-00007

Cited by

  1. Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vol.48, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.5.455
  2. Posterior Interbody Grafting and Instrumentation for Spondylodiscitis vol.20, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000101
  3. Surgical Management of Pyogenic Discitis of Lumbar Region vol.8, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.177
  4. Surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis: a comparison of two methods vol.38, pp.7, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2360-8
  5. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Postoperative Spondylodiscitis vol.56, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.4.310
  6. Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa cervical osteomyelitis vol.7, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.193264
  7. Comparative analysis of long-term outcome of anterior reconstruction in thoracic tuberculosis by direct anterior approach versus posterior approach vol.16, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.ajns_519_20