Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Intestinal Viability and Optimum Feeding Method of Lactobacillus in Broiler Chickens

육계에 대한 유산균의 장내 생존성 및 적정 급여방법에 대한 연구

  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to prove the optimum feeding method of Lactobacillus in broiler chickens by investigating the intestinal viability of ingested Lactobacillus and the effect of feeding levels and frequency of Lactobacillus on growth performance in broiler chickens. In experiment 1, A total of one hundred, 5 weeks old male broiler chickens(Abor Acre) were fed Lactobacillus reuteri avibro2 expressed green fluorescent protein(GFP) at 104cfu/g diet to investigate the retention time of ingested Lactobacillus in the intestine for 1 day. The percentage of Lactobacillus expressed GFP in intestinal contents was 26% at 1 day after fed Lactobacillus expressed GFP. The percentage of Lactobacillus expressed GFP in intestinal contents was decreased in length of time. In experiment 2, A total of four hundred eighty, 1-d-old male broiler chicks(Abor Acre) were randomly divided into 4 groups with 4 replicates of 30 birds each to prove the optimum feeding level of Lactobacillus. The treatments were control(free antibiotics), Lactobacillus reuteri avibro2 5.0×10cfu/mL, 5.0×103cfu/mL, and 5.0×105cfu/mL. The final body weight and body wight gain of Lactobacillus reuteri avibro2 5.0×103cfu/mL were the highest in all groups(P<0.05). Feed conversion ratio was not significantly difference among the groups. The number of intestinal lactic acid bacteria in Lactobacillus treated groups tended to be improved or significantly increased as compared to that of control(P<0.05). Protein and fat digestibility in Lactobacillus 5.0×103cfu/mL and 5.0×105cfu/mL treated groups were significantly improved(P<0.05). No significant differences were observed on the availability of dry matter and crude ash in Lactobacillus treatments compared to those of control. In experiment 3, A total of six hundred 1-d-old male broiler chicks(Abor Acre) were randomly divided into 4 groups with 4 replicates of 30 birds each and were fed Lactobacillus reuteri avibro2 at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 5 day for five weeks. Feeding level of Lactobacillus was 5.0×103cfu/mL The final body weight and body wight gain of Lactobacillus reuteri avibro2 5.0×103cfu/mL were the highest in all groups(P<0.05). The final body weight and body weight gain were significantly increased, when Lactobacillus was fed at intervals of 1 days, or 2 days. There were no significant differences in feed intake and feed conversion ratio among the all groups. The number of intestinal lactic acid bacteria in Lactobacillus treated groups tended to be improved or significantly increased as compared to that of control(P<0.05). No significant differences were observed on the number of coliform bacteria and Salmonella of ileum and cecum. Consequently, supplemental Lactobacillus influenced positive effects on the growth performance, nutrient availability and intestinal microflora. The optimum feeding level of Lactobacillus was 5.0×103cfu/mL, and the constant feeding of Lactobacillus was effective.

본 시험은 외인성 유산균의 장내 생존성과 유산균 첨가수준 및 급여빈도가 육계 생산성에 미치는 영향을 조사함으로써 유산균의 적정 급여방법을 구명하기 위하여 실시되었다. 시험 1에서는 외인성 유산균의 장내 체류 시간을 조사하기 위하여 5주령 육계(Abor Acre) 100수에서 사료 내 1.0×104cfu/g 수준으로 GFP 유전자가 도입된 유산균을 급여하였다. GFP 유산균을 육계에게 급여한 결과 급여 3일차까지는 일정한 수 이상의 유산균이 관찰되었으나 그 이후 급격히 감소되는 것을 확인하였다. 시험 2에서는 유산균 적정 첨가 수준을 구명하기 위하여 1일령 육계 수평아리(Abor Acre) 480수를 공시하여 4처리 4반복, 반복당 30수씩 임의 배치하여 5주간 사양시험을 실시하였다. 시험처리는 항생제 무첨가구를 대조구로 하였으며, 음수 내 유산균을 5.0×10cfu/mL, 5.0×103 cfu/mL, 및 5.0×105cfu/mL 수준으로 첨가하여 유산균 처리구를 두었다. 5주 종료 체중은 5.0×103cfu/mL 첨가 급여시 1,919g으로 가장 높았으며(P<0.05), 증체량은 5.0×103cfu/mL 및 5.0×105cfu/mL 첨가 급여시 대조구에 비해 유의하게 증가하였다(P<0.05). 회장 및 맹장 내 유산균 수에 있어서는 첨가수준별로 차이는 있었으나 유산균 첨가 급여시 회장 및 맹장 내 유산균 수가 유의하게 증가하였으며(P<0.05), 그 변화 양상은 회장과 맹장에서 유사하게 나타났다. 단백질 및 지방 이용율이 유의하게 증가하였다(P<0.05), 건물 및 조회분에 있어서는 처리간 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. 시험 3에서는 유산균 적정 급여 빈도를 구명하기 위하여 1일령 육계 수평아리(Abor Acre) 600수를 공시하여 5처리 4반복, 반복당 30수씩 임의 배치하여 5주간 사양시험을 실시하였다. 시험처리는 항생제 무첨가구를 대조구로 하였으며, 유산균이 5.0×103cfu/mL 수준으로 첨가된 음수를 1일, 2일, 3일 및 5일 간격으로 급여한 유산균 처리구를 두었다. 5주 종료체중 및 증체량에 있어서 유산균을 매일 또는 격일로 급여시 유의하게 증가하였다(P<0.05). 사료섭취량 및 사료요구율은 처리구간 차이가 없었다. 회장과 맹장내 유산균의 수는 유산균 급여시 전체적으로 증가하는 경향을 보였으며, 특히 매일 및 격일 급여시 유의하게 증가하였다(P< 0.05). Coliform bacteria 및 Salmonella 수에 있어서는 처리구간 차이가 없었다. 본 시험 결과, 유산균의 음수 내 첨가 급여는 육계 생산성 및 장내 미생물 균총에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 유산균의 적정 첨가 수준은 음수 1ml 당 유산균 5.0×103cfu이었으며, 급여 빈도에 있어서는 매일 급여하는 것이 효과적인 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis, 16th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington. D. C.
  2. Adler, H. E. and DaMass, A. J. 1980. Effect of ingested Lactobacilli on Salmonella infantis and Escherichia coli and on intestinal flora pasted vents and chick growth. Avian Dis. 24:868-878 https://doi.org/10.2307/1589962
  3. Barnes, E. M. and Impey, C. S. 1974. The occurrence and properties of uric acid decomposing anaerobic bacteria in the avian cecum. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 37:393-409 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1974.tb00455.x
  4. Bongaerts, G., Severijne, R. and Timmerman, H. 2005. Effect of antibiotics, prebiotics and probiotics in treatment for hepatic encephalopathy. Med. Hypotheses. 64:64-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2004.07.029
  5. Champ, M., Szylit, O., Raibaud, P. and Ait- Abdelkader, N. 1983. Amylase production by three Lactobacillus strains isolated from chicken crop. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 55:487 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb01689.x
  6. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometric. 11:1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  7. Dunham, H. J., William, C., Edens, F. W. Casas, I. A. and Dobrogosz, W. J. 1993. Lactobacillus reuteri immunomodulation of stressor-associated disease in newly hatched chickens and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 72(Suppl 1):103(abstract)
  8. Fuller, R. 1973. Ecological studies on the Lactobacillus flora associated with the crop epithelium of the fowl. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 36:131- 139 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1973.tb04080.x
  9. Fuller, R. 1975. Nature of the determinant responsible for the adhesion of Lactobacilli to chicken crop epithelial cells. Fournal of General Microbiology. 87:245-25 https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-87-2-245
  10. Fuller, R. 1977. The importance of Lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in crop. Br. Poult. Sci. 18:85-94 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667708416332
  11. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  12. Gibson, G. R. and Fuller, R. 2000. Aspects of in vitro and in vivo research approaches directed toward identifying probiotics and prebiotics for human use. J. Nutr. 130:391-395
  13. Gilliland, S. E. 1979. Beneficial interrelationships between certain micro-organisms and humans: Candidate micro-organisms for use as dietary adjuncts. J. Food Protect. 42:164 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-42.2.164
  14. Impey, C. S. and Mead, G. C. 1989. Fate of Salmonellasin the alimentary tract of chicks pre-treated with a mature caecal microflora to increase colonization resistance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:469.15.Jin L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N. and Jalaudin, S. 1996. Influence of dried Bacillus subtillis and Lactobacilli cultures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Australian J. Anim. Sci. 9:397-403 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1996.397
  15. Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., Ali, M. A. and Jalaudin, S. 1998. Growth performance intestinal microbial populations and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 77:1259-1265 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.9.1259
  16. Lyons, T. P. 1987. Probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics. Pig News Info. 8:157-164
  17. Maiolino, R., Fioretti, A., Menna, L. F. and Meo, C. 1992. Research on the efficiency of Mohan, B., Kadirvel, R., Natarajan, A. and Bhaskaran, M. 1996. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth nitrogen utilization and serum cholesterol in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:395-401 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417870
  18. Mohan, B., Kadirvel, R., Natarajan, A. and Bhaskaran, M. 1996. Effect of probiotic supple- mentation on growth nitrogen utilization and serum cholesterol in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 37: 395-401 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417870
  19. Nahashon, S. N., Nakaue, H. S., Snyder, S. P. and Mirosh, L. W. 1994. Performance of single Comb white Leghorn layers fed corn-soybean meal and barley-corn-soybean meal diets supple- mented with a direct fed microbial. Poult. Sci. 73:1712-1723 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731712
  20. NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirement of poultry. National Research Council National Academy of Science Washington DC
  21. Nurmi, E. and Rantala, M. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature. 241:210-211 https://doi.org/10.1038/241210a0
  22. Pirgozliev, V., Oduguwa, O., Acamovic, T. and Bedford, M. R. 2007. Effect of diets containing Esherichia coli-derived phytase to young chickens and turkeys: effects on performance, metabolisable energy, endogenous secretions and intestinal morphology. Poult. Sci. 86:705-713
  23. Prins, R. A. 1977. Biochemical activities of gut micro-organisms. In: Clarke, R., T., J. and Bauchop, T. eds. Microbial Ecology of the Gut. p73-183. London. Academic press
  24. SAS. 2002 SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 9.1, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA
  25. Smith, M. W. 1985. Expression of digestive and absorptive function in differentiating enterocytes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47:247 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.001335
  26. Schneitz, C., Kiiskinen, T., Toivonen, V. and Näsi, M. 1998. Effect of BROILACT${\circleR}$ on the physicochemical conditions and nutrient digestibility in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Poult. Sci. 77:426-432 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.426
  27. Stavric, S., Cleeson, T. M., Blanchfield, B. and Pivnick, H. 1987. Role of adhering microflora in competitive exclusion of Salmonella from young chicks. J. Food Protect. 50:928 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-50.11.928
  28. Tagg, J. R., Dajani, A. S. and Wannamaker, L. W. 1976. Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 40:722-756
  29. Watkins, B. A., Miller, B. F. and Neil, D. H. 1982. In vivo effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic chicks. Poult. Sci. 61:1298-1308 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0611298
  30. Watkins, B. A. and Kratzer, F. H. 1983. Effect of oral dosing of Lactobacillus strains on gut colonization and liver biotin in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 62:2088-2094 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0622088
  31. White, F., Wenham, G., Sharman, G. A., Jones, A. S., Rattray, E. A. and McDonald, I. 1969. Stomach function in relation to a scour syndrome in the piglet. Br. J. Nutr. 23:847-58 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19690095
  32. Yeo, J. and Kim, K. 1997. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or Yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 76:381-385 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.381
  33. 김상호, 박수영, 유동조, 나재천, 최철한, 박용윤, 이상진, 류경선. 2000. 육계 생산성 및 맹장내 미생물에 대한 유산균의 첨가 효과. 한국가금학회지. 27:37-41
  34. 김세헌, 유승권, 오세종, 한경식, 김영훈. 2006. 락토바실러스 균종을 위한 형질전환 방법 및 외래 단백질 발현 백터. 등록번호 10-0635450
  35. 박수영, 김상호, 유동조, 이상진, 류경선. 2001. 유산균의 급여가 육계의 성장능력에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 28(1):27-40