Journal of the Korean Society of Costume (복식)

The Korean Society of Costume (한국복식학회)
권호 표지

An Observation on Characteristic of Architectural Paradigm in Twentieth Century Fashion Design

20세기 패션디자인의 건축적 패러다임 특성 고찰

  • Park, Shin-Mi (Research Department of Visual Arts, The University of Sydney) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Jung (Division of Fashion Design Contents, Kookmin University)
  • Published : 2008.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The mutual relationship between fashion and architecture and the similarities in their form and structure have been continuously debated over the decades, considering that both spheres are objects used in human life. Both spheres bring about the creation of three-dimensional space structures that are completed by the human body and material, based on a design targeted for people. The similarities between fashion and architecture in terms of form and structure have been debated by western architecture scholars focusing on the support that holds the garment's shape, the tailoring of a men's suit and also the material. The debate originates from the discussion of F. Th. Vischer, Kritische Gnge, and Gottfried Semper during the nineteenth century on the similarities between crinoline and the form of architecture and also the similarities between sewing and architecture. However, architects always regarded fashion as the inferior creative process that follows architecture in viewing the relationship between fashion and architecture. During the mid to end of the twentieth century, contrary to previous decades, the sense of fashion in architecture stood out, as an issue and a different approach was taken in discussing architecture that incorporates fashion. Accordingly, in the mid 1990's, architecture scholars such as Deborah Fausch and Mark Wigley began to conduct close observation of the mutual relationship between fashion and architecture from a more equal point of view. Notwithstanding, their point of view was still biased towards architectural standards. Commencing the Millennium, fashion has become the primary work of creation which leads style in all spheres, and under these circumstances this point of view has transferred from architecture to fashion when thinking about relationships between these spheres. The discussion on fashion and architecture form fashion's point of view is currently concentrated on the post 1990's phenomenon and illustrates the environment that is related to architecture. In general, the discussion is limited to determining a work of an individual designer as 'being architectural' when explaining the sculptural form of fashion. Therefore, this research aims to renew the discussion on twentieth century fashion design, which was neglected in any studies on observing architecture and fashion. The aim of this research is to classify the architectural paradigm of twentieth century fashion design and to observe the architectural forms of the respective eras. It is necessary to have a close observation of the architectural paradigm in twentieth century fashion design where support tools such as the crinoline was avoided and the form and functionality of the garment itself was emphasized. I will conduct this research by considering the architectural form shown in fashion as a practical three-dimensional creation that exists in space.

Keywords

References

  1. F. Th. Vischer, Kritische Gnge (Stuttgart, 1861). Vernnftige Gedanken ber die jetzige Mode new series, no.3, p. 100
  2. 자료검색일 2007. 2. 2, 자료출처 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Semper
  3. Deborah Fausch, Paulette Singley, Rodolphe El- Khoury and Zvi Efrat (1994). Arcutecture: In Fashion, Princeton Architectural Press Inc, New York, p. 9
  4. Walter Benjamin (1939). The Arcades Project, tr. Hoard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin: Prepared on the basis of the German Volume edition by Rolf Tledemann, 2002, Belknap Harvard
  5. 자료검색일 2007. 2. 2, 자료출처 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Riegl
  6. M. Olin (1992). Forms of re- presentation in Alois Riegl's theory of art. University Park
  7. Deborah Fausch, Paulette Singley, Rodolphe El-Khoury and Zvi Efrat (1994). Architecture: In Fashion. Princeton Architectural Press Inc, New York, p. 13
  8. Deborah Fausch, Paulette Singley, Rodolphe El-Khoury and Zvi Efrat (1994). Architecture: In Fashion. Princeton Architectural Press Inc, New York, p. 7
  9. Mark Wigley (1995). White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. first paper- back edition 2001, MIT, Massachusetts
  10. Edited by Helen Castle (2000). Fashion+ Archi- tecture. London, Wiley-Academy, Architectural Design, vol.70, No.6, December 2000
  11. Bradley Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London
  12. 자료검색일 2007. 10. 8, 자료출처 http://www.moca.org/museum/exhibitiondetail.php?&id=370 http://www.pingmag.jp/2007/06/15/skin-bones-parallel-practices-in-fashion-and-architecture
  13. 자료검색일 2007. 10. 8, 자료출처 http://www.nact.jp/english/skin_and_bones.html
  14. Bradley Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London
  15. 양희영, 양숙희 (2006). 1990년대 이후에 나타난 건축적 패러다임에 관한 연구. 복식, 56 (7), pp. 85-100
  16. 박신미, 이재정 (2007). 패션과 건축의 조형적 패러다임 유사성 고찰. 한국기초조형학회, 8(4), pp. 262-277
  17. Francois Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr.
  18. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, pp. 154-158
  19. Manacinelli in Bauzano Gianluca Ba- uzano (2001). Roberto Capucci: Timeless creati- vity. Skira, Italy, p. 29
  20. Bradley Quinn (2002). Techno Fashion. BERG. London, p. 39
  21. Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London, pp. 4-109
  22. YeohLee Teng (2003). YEOH- LEE: WORK material architecture. The image publishing group Pty Ltd, Australia, pp. 14-24
  23. Wigley. (1995). White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. first paper- back edition 2001, MIT, Massachusett, p. xix
  24. Kritische. (Stuttgart, 1861). Quoted in Walter Benjamin, new series, no.3, p. 66
  25. Martin L. Davis (1980). Visual In Dress. Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey, p. 279
  26. Martin L. Davis (1980). Visual In Dress. Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey, p. 280
  27. Carol Strickland (2001). The Annotated Arch-a crash in the history of architecture. Andrews Mc- Meel Publishing, Kansas, p. 37
  28. Baudot. (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 82
  29. Laurence Benam (2004). GRES, Assouline. New York tr. Uniontra, pp. 5-9
  30. Fausch and et al. (1994). Architecture: In Fashion. Princeton Architectural Press Inc, New York, p. 7
  31. Roland Barthes' SYSTEME DE LA MODE. Aust. J. Cultural Studies I: May 1983, p. 19
  32. Wigley (1995), White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. first paper- back edition 2001, MIT, Massachusetts p. xxiv
  33. Wigley. (1995). White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. first paper- back edition 2001, MIT, Massachusetts p. xiv
  34. Chris Rodrigues and Chris Garratt (2004). Introdu- cing Modernism. Icon books, London, p. 8
  35. Valerie Mendes & Amy de la Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye p. 36
  36. Baudot. (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 34
  37. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye p. p. 28
  38. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye p. 109
  39. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 118
  40. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 118
  41. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye pp. 110, 160
  42. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye p. 180
  43. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 154
  44. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr p. 158
  45. Elisabeth Langle (2005). Pierre Cardin fifty years of fashion and design. the Vendome Press, New York, p. 17
  46. Elisabeth Langle (2005). Pierre Cardin fifty years of fashion and design. the Vendome Press, New York, pp. 138-168
  47. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye pp. 185-186
  48. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye pp. 188
  49. Bauzano(2001). Roberto Capucci: Timeless creati- vity. Skira, Italy, p. p. 13
  50. Bauzano (2001). Roberto Capucci: Timeless creati- vity. Skira, Italy, p. 20
  51. Manacinelli in (2001). Roberto Capucci: Timeless creati- vity. Skira, Italy, p. 29
  52. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, pp. 262-282
  53. 김혜정 (1997). 현대 건축의 형태구성과 해체주의 패션의 특성 연구. 세종대학교대학원 박사학위 논문, p. 17
  54. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr p. 262
  55. James Wolcott, Marylou Luther and Pamela A. Parmal (2005). Beene by Beene Geoffrey Beene. the Vendome Press, New York, p. 1
  56. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 341
  57. Quinn (2002). Techno Fashion. BERG. London, p. 39
  58. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson p. 351
  59. Mendes and Haye (1999). 20th- Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson, London Mendes and Haye pp. 237-239
  60. Quinn (2002). Techno Fashion. BERG. London, p. 156
  61. Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London, pp. 34-82
  62. Robrigues and Garratt (2004). Introducing Modernism. Icon books, London, p. 30
  63. Richard Appignaesl and Charls Garratt with Ziauddin Sardar and Patrick Curry (2004). Introducing Postmodernism, 10th, Icon books, London, p. 4
  64. Mark Holborn (1995). ISSEY MIYAKE. Taschen, London, p. 24
  65. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 322
  66. Baudot (1999). The French Mode du Sicle. Paris, ditions Assouline, tr. Jane, Brentin (1999). A Century of Fashion. London, Thames & Hudson, p. 326
  67. Quinn (2003 Techno Fashion. BERG. London, p. 8
  68. Louise Mitchell (2005). The Cutting Edge Fashion from Japan. Power House Museum, Sydney, p. 99.
  69. Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, Londonp. 109
  70. Bradley Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London p.105
  71. Jean Michel Place (1998). Process of Transforma- tion-Lucy Orta, studio Orta, Paris, p. 84
  72. Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London p. 155
  73. Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. Berg, London p. 4
  74. Susannah Frankel (2001). VISIONARLES INTER- VIEW WITH FASHION DESIGNERS, V&A pu- blication, New York, p. 68
  75. Susannah Frankel (2001). VISIONARLES INTER- VIEW WITH FASHION DESIGNERS, V&A pu- blication, New York, p. 70
  76. Ruth Hanisch (2006). ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS!- ARCHITECTURE AND FASHION, London, Prestel Verla, p. 125