[ $^{18}F-FDG$ ] PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma: Is It Necessary to Include the Skull and Lower Extremity Distal to Mid-Thigh?

다발성 골수종에서의 $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT: 전신영상 획득이 필요한가?

  • Lee, Su-Jin (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Joon-Young (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Hyun (Departments of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Jeong (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Young-Seok (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hyun, Seung-Hyup (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Young (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Han (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Byung-Tae (Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 이수진 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 최준영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 김기현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 내과) ;
  • 이은정 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 조영석 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 현승협 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 이지영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 이경한 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 김병태 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 핵의학과)
  • Published : 2008.02.29

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated whether it was necessary to perform whole body acquisition of $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT including whole skull and lower extremity (LE) distal to mid-thigh (MT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and Methods: Thirty patients underwent 45 whole body $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT scans including skull and LE distal to MT. PET scans were divided by 2 subgroups according to the presence of abnormal focal $^{18}F$-FDG uptake in skull or LE distal to MT. Clinical characteristics including age, sex, and stages were compared between the 2 subgroups. Results: Of total 45 whole body PET/CT scans, focally increased abnormal FDG uptake in the skull or LE distal to MT suggesting myeloma involvement was found in 22 scans (48.9%) of 14 patients (46.7%). Skull lesions were more frequently observed than LE lesions distal to MT on PET (86.4% vs. 40.9%, p<0.005). There were no significant differences in age, sex, initial Durie/Salmon stage, and tumor burden at the time of PET scan suggested by serum hemoglobin level, serum calcium level, serum and urine paraprotein level, and serum creatinine level between the two subgroups. The presence of the skull or LE distal MT lesions on PET did not affect on the Durie/Salmon plus stage except only 1 case (1/22, 4.5%, p>0.05). Conclusion: Abnormal lesions in the skull or LE distal to MT on $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT did not affect significantly on the tumor burden and Durie/Salmon plus stage of MM. Therefore, torso PET acquisition including head may be sufficient for evaluating patients with MM.

목적: 이 연구에서는 다발성 골수종에서 두개골과 중간 허벅지 이하 하지부를 포함한 전신 $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT 영상 획득의 필요여부를 알아보았다. 대상 및 방법: 총 30명(평균나이: $59.4{\pm}11.7$세, 남/여 17/13명)의 환자를 대상으로 두개골과 중간 허벅지 이하 하지부를 포함한 전신 $^{18}F$-FDG PET/CT 영상을 총 45개 촬영하였다. PET 영상에서 두개골 또는 중간 허벅지 이하 하지부에 주변보다 비정상적인 국소 섭취증가를 보이는 병변 유무에 따라 두 그룹으로 나누어 나이, 성별, 병기 등의 임상소견 차이를 비교해보았다. 결과: 총 45개의 전신 PET/CT 영상에서 두개골 또는 중간 허벅지 이하 하지부 병변은 14명 환자(46.7%)의 22개 스캔(48.9%)에서 발견되었다. 그 중 두개골 병변은 중간 허벅지 이하 하지부 병변에 비해 유의하게 흔히 관찰되었다(86.4% 대 40.9%, p<0.005). 이 두 환자군 사이에 종양의 양을 반영하는 혈색소 수치, 혈청 칼슘 수치, 혈청 면역글로불린 수치, 뇨 면역글로불린 수치, 혈청 크레아티닌 수치에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 두개골 또는 중간 허벅지 이하 하지에 비정상적인 국소 FDG 섭취증가를 보인 22개의 PET 영상에서 두개골 또는 중간 허벅지 이하 하지 병변으로 인하여 Durie/Salmon plus 병기가 상승된 경우는 단 1개(4.5%, p>0.05)였다. 결론: FET 영상에서 두개골 또는 중간 허벅지 이하 하지 병변은 다발성 골수종에 있어 종양의 양 및 병기 평가에 유의한 영향을 주지 못했다. 따라서 다발성 골수종에서 머리와 다리를 포함한 전신영상을 꼭 촬영할 필요는 없으며, 머리를 포함한 몸통 영상획득 방법이 가장 적절할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 1975;36:842-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::AID-CNCR2820360303>3.0.CO;2-U
  2. Bataille R, Durie BG, Grenier J, Sany J. Prognostic factors and staging in multiple myeloma: a reappraisal. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:80-7 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1986.4.1.80
  3. Angtuaco EJ, Fassas AB, Walker R, Sethi R, Barlogie B. Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging. Radiology 2004;231:11-23 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311020452
  4. Durie BG, Waxman AD, D'Agnolo A, Williams CM. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1457-63
  5. Gertz MA. Relevant prognostic features of multiple myeloma and the new International Staging System. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;48:458-68 https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190601059753
  6. Jadvar H, Conti PS. Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:690-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-002-0580-2
  7. Schirrmeister H, Bommer M, Buck AK, Muller S, Messer P, Bunjes D, Dohner H, Bergmann L, Reske SN. Initial results in the assessment of multiple myeloma using 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:361-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-001-0711-3
  8. Bredella MA, Steinbach L, Caputo G, Segall G, Hawkins R. Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1199-204 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841199
  9. Zamagni E, Nanni C, Patriarca F, Englaro E, Castellucci P, Geatti O, et al. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007;92:50-5 https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.10554
  10. Durie BG. The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:1539-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.037
  11. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Alexanian R, et al. Multiple myeloma: MR patterns of response to treatment. Radiology 1994;193:441-6 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972760
  12. Van de Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Michaux L, Labaisse M, Malghem J, Jamart J, et al. Stage I multiple myeloma: value of MR imaging of the bone marrow in the determination of prognosis. Radiology 1996;201:243-6 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816551
  13. Fonti R, Salvatore B, Quarantelli M, Sirignano C, Segreto S, Petruzziello F, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma. J Nucl Med 2008;49:195-200 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.045641
  14. Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1200-9