Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Jury Evaluation Test for Annoyance Response of KTX(Korea Train Express) and Ordinary Train Noise

고속철도와 일반철도소음의 성가심 반응에 대한 청감실험 비교 연구

  • 전형준 (서울시립대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김득성 (서울시립대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 고준희 (서울시립대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 장서일 (서울시립대학교 환경공학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, public complaints against railroad noise by KTX and Ordinary train have been rising. Regulation of railways noise uses same standard without distinguishing the type of railroad cars. According to the type of railroad cars, the frequency characteristics of emitting noise is different. Therefore it is requested to know how the public response vary to each types of railroad cars. The noise annoyance from three types of trains(KTX, electric train, diesel train) was analyzed by jury evaluation test for assessing the effect of frequency characteristics. The numerical results by a semantic differential method showed that annoyance response to three type of trains depended on the frequency characteristics. As a result, this study proposed that the KTX could have a bonus level of maximum 2.9 dB(A) compared to ordinary train.

Keywords

References

  1. An, J.-H., 2006, 'Study on Sound Quality Attributes causing Annoyance of Road Traffic Noise with Idential Linear Sound Pressure Level', University of Seoul
  2. Lim, C. W., 2006, 'Assessment Methods of Adverse Effects on Health from Environmental Noise', Seoul, Seoul National University
  3. Kwon, S. H., 2004, 'SAS., SPSS Practical Use-analysis of Survey', Freedom Academy, pp. 95-115
  4. Bert De Coensel, et al., 2007, 'Experimental Investigation of Noise Annoyance Caused by High-speed Trains', Acta Acustaca United with Acustica, Vol. 93, pp. 589-601
  5. AES20-1996, 1996, 'AES Recommended Practice for Professional Audio-Subjective Evaluation of Loudspeakers', Audio Engineering Society Standard, New York
  6. Otto, N. and Amman, S., et al., 1999, 'Guidelines for Jury Evaluations of Automotive Sounds', SAE 1999-01-1822, 1999 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference, May 1999, Traverse City, MI, USA
  7. Baranek, L. L., 1989, 'Balanced Noise- Criterion (NCB) Curves', J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 650-664 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398243
  8. Miedema, H. M. E. and Oudshroom, C. G. M., 2001, 'Annoyance from Transportation Noise : Relationships with Exposure Metrics DNL and DENL and Their Confidence Intervals', Environmental Health Perspect, Vol. 109, pp. 409-416 https://doi.org/10.2307/3454901
  9. Takashi Morihara, et al, 2004, 'Comparison of Dose–.response Relationships between Railway and Road Traffic Noises : The Moderating Effect of Distance', Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 277, pp. 559-565 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.017
  10. Kryter, K. D., 1994. 'Community Annoyance from Aircraft and Ground Vehicle Noise', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 72, pp. 1222-1242 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388332
  11. Lim, C. W., et al, 2005, 'Community Annoyance from Civil Aircraft Noise in Korea', Proceedings of the KSNVE Annual Spring Conference, pp. 900-904

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Annoyance of Various Train Pass-by Noise Using Binaural Recording vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2014.24.4.289
  2. Classification Accuracy Test of Hearing Laboratory Test Models for Railway Noise at Station Platform vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2015.25.4.299
  3. Analyses of the Railway Noise Transmission Characteristics of the Rooms in High-speed Train Stations Depending on Building Types vol.34, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7776/ASK.2015.34.5.385