과산화수소수와 통기에 의한 Chemical oxidation법을 적용한 모형 매립지로부터 생성된 침출수의 독성 monitoring

Monitoring the Leachate Toxicities from a Pilot Landfill Treated with Chemical Oxidation using Hydrogen Peroxide and Aeration

  • 발행 : 2008.12.30

초록

폐기물 매립지의 조기 안전화를 위해 여러 가지 Chemical Oxidation법이 개발되어 왔지만, 이 방법을 폐기물 매립지에 적용하고 난 후에 생성될 수 있는 부산물들이 주변 환경에 영향을 줄 가능성이 있다. 그래서, 이 방법을 실제 매립지에 적용하기 전에, 일본 키타큐슈에 있는 소각재가 묻혀 있는 모형 매립지에 다섯 가지 조건 -A, 콤포스트 추가; B, 과산화수소수 살수; 과산화수소수+공기주입; D, 공기주입; E, control- 을 적용하여 그 효능을 테스트하였고, 이 매립지에서 이 방법들의 적용 후에 생성되는 침출수의 급성 독성을 세 가지 microbiotests를 이용하여 monitoring하였다. 테스트 기간 중, 침출수의 수질은 개선되었고, 그 급성 독성은 점차적으로 감소하였다. 과산화수소수와 공기의 조합을 적용한 후 생성된 침출수의 급성 독성이 가장 빨리 감소하여 폐기물 매립지의 조기 안정화에 도움을 주었다. 이러한 독성 시험 결과는 몇 가지 화학적 parameters와 상관성이 있었고 여기에 사용된 급성 독성 테스트법은, 매립지 안정화를 위한 Chemical Oxidation법의 적용 후, 침출수 수질을 monitoring하는데 적절하였다. 그러므로 폐기물 매립지의 조기 폐지 기준에 독성 시험의 포함을 고려해 볼 필요가 있다고 생각한다.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atwater JW, Jasper S, Mavinic DS and Koch FA. Experiments using daphnia to measure landfill leachate toxicity, Wat Res 1983; 17: 1855-1861 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90209-9
  2. Battelle. Environmental Technology Verification Report-Strategic Diagnostics Inc. $Microtox^{\circledR}$ Rapid toxicity testing system. Under a cooperative agreement with US EPA 2003a: http://www.epa.gov/etv/pdfs/vrvs/01_vs_microtox.pdf
  3. Battelle. Environmental Technology Verification Report-Checklight, Ltd. ToxScreen-II, Rapid toxicity testing system. Under a cooperative agreement with US EPA 2003b: http://www.epa.gov/etv/pdfs/vrvs/01_vs_toxscreen.pdf
  4. Barbusinski K. Toxicity of industrial wastewater treated by Fenton's reagent, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2005; 14: 11-16
  5. Cho E-A, Tameda K, Yamada T, Higuchi S and Hanashima M. Toxicological evaluation of the chemical oxidation for landfill stabilization, Proceedings of the Asian-Pacific Landfill Symposium, Shanghai, China 2006; 52-56
  6. Cheung KC, Chu LM and Wong MH. Toxic effect of landfill leachate on microalgae, Water Air Soil Poll 1993;69: 337-349 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478169
  7. Clement B and Merlin G. The contribution of ammonia and alkalinity to landfill leachate toxicity to duckweed, The Science of the Total Environment 1995; 170: 71-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04563-G
  8. Clement B Persoone G Janssen RC, and Le Du-Delepierre A. Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates. I. Determination of leachate toxicity with a battery of acute tests, Chemosphere 1996; 33:2303-2320 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00322-0
  9. Clement B, Janssen RC and Du-Delepierre A. Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates. 2. Comparison of physico-chemical characteristics of landfill leachates with their toxicity determined with a battery of tests, Chemosphere 1997; 35: 2783-2796 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00332-9
  10. Ernst WR, Hennigar P, Doe K, Wade S and Julien G. Characterization of the chemical constituents and toxicity to aquatic organisms of a municipal landfill leachate, Water Poll. Res. J. Canada 1994; 29: 89-101
  11. ISO. Water quality-determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea)- acute toxicity test, International Organization of the Standardization 1996; 6341
  12. Kang YW and Hwang K-Y. Effects of reaction conditions on the oxidation efficiency in the Fenton process, Wat Res 2000; 34: 2786-2790 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00388-7
  13. Keddy CJ, Greene JC and Bonnell MA. Review of wholeorganism bioassays: soil, freshwater sediment, and freshwater assessment in Canada, Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 1995; 30: 221-251 https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1995.1027
  14. Kisaki M, Higuchi S and Yoshizaki K. Research on the earlyclosing and early stabilization of the MSW landfill, Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Japanese Waste Management, Sikoku, Japan 2004; 1208-1210
  15. Kross BC and Cherryholmes K. Toxicity screening of sanitary landfill leachates: a comparative evaluation with Microtox analyses, chemical, and other toxicity screening methods. In: Richardson, M.L.(ed) Ecotoxicology Monitoring 1993; VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 225-249
  16. Marttinen SK, Kettunen RH, Sormunen KM, Soimasuo RM and Rintala JA. Screening of physical-chemical methods for removal of organic material, nitrogen, toxicity from low strength landfill leachate, Chemosphere 2002; 46:851-858 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00150-3
  17. OECD. Daphnia sp., Acute immobilisation test and reproduction test, OECD Guideline for Testing Chemicals 1984; TG 202
  18. Stensen M. Chemical oxidation for the treatment of leachate-process comparison and results from full-scale plants, Chemosphere 1997; 35: 249-256
  19. Torokne A. Sensitivity evaluation of the Daphtoxkit and Thamnotoxkit microbiotests on blind samples, J Applied Toxicol 2004; 24: 323-326 https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1018
  20. Ulitzur S, Lahav T and Ulitzur N. A novel and sensitive test for rapid determination of water toxicity, Environ Toxicol 2002; 17: 291-296 https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.10060
  21. Wang F, Smith DW and El-Din MG. Aged raw landfill leachate: membrane fraction, $O_3$ only and $O_3/H_2O_2$ oxidation, and molecular size distribution analysis, Wat Res 2006;40: 463-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.038