DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Potentiometric Performance of Mercury (II) Ion-Selective Electrode Based on Tetracycline Antibiotics

  • Published : 2008.02.28

Abstract

Poly (vinylchloride) (PVC) membrane electrodes based on neutral carrier, tetracycline was prepared as an active sensor for Hg(II) ion, and tested in different contents of the potassium tetrakis (4-chlorophenyl) borate (KTpClPB) as lipophilic salt. Bis (2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DOS), bis(l-butylpentyl) adipate (BBPA), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) were used as diverse plasticizing solvent mediators. This electrode shows excellent potentiometric response characteristics and display good linearity with log $[Hg^{+2}]$ versus EMF response, over a range of concentrations between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-3}M$. With 30.8mV/decade Nernstian slope, the detection limit was $6.9{\times}10^{-9}M$ and the response time was less than 20s. The proposed electrode yields very good selectivity for mercury (II) ion over many cations such as alkali, alkaline earth, transition and heavy metal ions. And it shows a very stable potential values in a wide pH range. This reliable electrode prepared was kept at least a month without considerable alteration in their response to Hg (II) ion.

Keywords

References

  1. E. Bakker, P. Buhlmann, E. Pretsch, Chem. Rev. 97, 3083 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr940394a
  2. P. Buhlmann, E. Pretsch, E. Bakker, Chem. Rev. 98, 1593 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr970113+
  3. M. T. Lai; J. S. Shih, Analyst, 111, 891 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1039/an9861100891
  4. V. K. Gupta; S. Jain; U. Khurana, Electroanalysis 9, 478 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140090609
  5. Lu, J.; Tong, X.; He, X. J. of Electroanal. Chem. 540, 111 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01298-6
  6. L. Xu; R. Yuan; Y. Q. Chai, Chem. Lett. 34, 440 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2005.440
  7. G. Ye, T. Chai, R. Yuan, J. Dai, Analytical Sciences 22, 579 (2006) https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.22.579
  8. W. E. Morf, W. Simon, Helv. Chim. Acta, 54, 2683 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19710540832
  9. M. Schafer, G. M. Sheldrick, I. Bahner, H. Lackner, Angew. Chem. int. 37, 2391 (1998)
  10. I. R. Paeng, Anal. Sci. Tech. 18, 491 (2005)
  11. A. Albert, Nature(London), 172, 201 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1038/172201a0
  12. A. Albert; C. W. Rees, Nature (London). 177, 433 (1956) https://doi.org/10.1038/177433a0
  13. J. Baek, J.-S. Kim, I. R. Paeng, K.-J. Paeng, Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc., 29, 165 (2008) https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.1.165
  14. S. S. Park, S. O. Jung, S. M. Kim, J.-S. Kim, Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc. 17, 405 (1996)
  15. P. Richard, E. L. Buck, Pure & Appl. Chem. 66, 2527 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466122527
  16. P. Job, Ann. Chim. 9, 113 (1928)
  17. F. Benet; J. E. Goyan, J. Pharm. Sci. 55, 1184 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600551103
  18. J. L. Colaizzi; A. M. Knevel; A. N. Martin, J. Pharm. Sci. 54, 1425 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600541006
  19. K. H. lbsen; M. R. Urist, Proc. SOC. Exp. Biol. Med. 109, 797 (1962) https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-109-27339
  20. L. A. Mitscher; A. C. Bonacci; B. Slater-Eng; A. K. Hacker; T. D. Sokoloski Antimicrob, Agents Chemother. 11, 1 (1969)
  21. J. T. Doluisio; A. N. Martin; J. Med. Chem. 6, 16 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00337a003
  22. W. A. Baker, P. M. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88, 1314 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00958a041
  23. A. H. Caswell; J. D. Hutchison, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43, 625 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(71)90660-7
  24. M. H. Mashhadizadeh; I. Sheikhshoaie, Talanta 60, 73 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00036-5
  25. A. Lewenstam; A. Hulanicki, Selec. Electrode Rev. 12, 161 (1990)

Cited by

  1. Quantitative detection of tetracycline residues in honey by a simple sensitive immunoassay vol.626, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.003
  2. The Potentiometric Performances of the Cation Selective Electrodes based on Tetracycline and Chemically Modified Tetracycline vol.2, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5229/JECST.2011.2.3.143