The Development and Application for Multimedia Rich Project Based Learning

멀티미디어 기술을 활용한 프로젝트 학습 전략 개발 및 적용

  • Lee, YoungMin (JeonBuk mechanical & technical high school) ;
  • Ryu, JinSon (Korea education & research information service)
  • Received : 2008.01.30
  • Accepted : 2008.03.12
  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is that after developing and applying multimedia rich project-based learning methods in a Korean Special high school(Industrial and Technical Area), to provide how the learners recognize the effectiveness for it and to obtain the implication from effectiveness which they recognized. This study was conducted as action research based on a high school situation. The study included 100 participants in two classes purposively selected from 9 classes at 450 student high school. Data were collected through observations, surveys and interview. Results indicated the multimedia rich project-based learning allowed students to understand the contents of major subject overall, improve the handling skill for computer multimedia and be better at investigating and organizing skill for subject content. Also, it allowed them to improve interaction among students and participation, motivation, satisfaction, interest and confidence for learning. And there was close cooperation with and among group members to create better products.. Finally, the flexibility in the project-based learning environment allowed the participants to make decisions about their abilities, resources, and plans. Recommendations and implications for teacher educators as well as inservice and preservice teachers are also presented.

이 연구의 목적은 멀티미디어 기술을 활용한 프로젝트 학습전략을 개발하고, 수업현장에 적용하여 그 효과에 대한 학습자들이 인식과 시사점을 제시하는 것이다. 이 연구는 J기계공업고등학교 환경에서 시행된 현장연구이다. 연구 대상은 3학년 100명을 대상으로 하였다. 자료는 관찰, 설문조사, 인터뷰를 통하여 수집되었고, 백분율로 처리 되었다. 결론적으로 멀티미디어 기술을 활용한 프로젝트 학습 효과로서 전공교과내용의 종합적 이해, 컴퓨터 멀티미디어 처리능력과 자료 탐색 및 조직 능력이 향상된 것으로 학습자들은 인식하였다. 또한, 학습 동기, 학습자들 간의 협동 활동, 학습 참여 정도, 학습의 만족감, 학습에 대한 자신감, 학습자들 간의 상호작용과 학습 흥미 등이 높아진 것으로 학습자들은 인식하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 마지막으로 연구의 시사점과 제언을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이무근.김판욱.김재식(1995). 실기교육방법론. 서울 : 배영사
  2. 이영민(2006). 혼합학습(Blending learning) 환경에서 프로젝트 학습법 실천사례. 대한공업교육학회지, 31(1). 129-145.
  3. 이춘식(1991). 기술교과 교육에서 프로젝트법의 적용 방안. 대한공업교육학회지. 16(1). 53-62
  4. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
  5. Bialo, E. R. & Sivin-Kachala, J. (1996). The effectiveness of technology in schools: A summary of recent research. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association.
  6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). "Situated cognition and the culture of learning", Educational Researcher, 19(1), 32-42.
  7. Brunig, R., H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  8. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). "Learning style-based teaching to raise minority student test scores: There's no debate!", Clearing House, 76(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650209604959
  9. Gonzales, A. H., & Nelson, L. M. (2005), "Learner-Centered Instruction Promotes Student Success: Northface University Prepares Its Computer Science Students for the Workplace with Real-World Projects", The Journal, 32(6), 10-15.
  10. Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  11. Hawkins, J. (1995). Supporting teacher in changing roles. A group paper from the NSF Educational Technology Workshop. Setting an agenda for Computer science in educational technology(pp. 23-31), Computing Research Association, Washington, D.C.
  12. Lave, J. (1990). "The culture of acquisition and the practice of learning", In J.W. Stigler, R.A., Shweder & G. Herdt (eds), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 259-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). "Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning", Eudcational Psychologist, 38,43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  14. Means, B. (1994). "Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals", In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 1-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1994). "The link between technology and authentic learning" Educational Leadership, 51(7), 15-18.
  16. Moreno, R. & Valdez, A. (2005). "Cognitive Load and Learning Effects of Having Students Organize Pictures and Words in Multimedia Environments: The Role of Student Interactivity and Feedback", ETR&D. 53(3). Pp.35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504796
  17. Ruetters, K. (1982). Aspects of an integrative didactics for vocational education. Exemplified on the subject drilling and boring, Journal of the Korean institute of Industrial educator. 7(2).
  18. Tomas, J. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-based Learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
  19. Wilson, B. G., & cole, P. (1991). "A review of cognitive teaching models", Education Technology Research & Development, 39(4), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296571