Anatomical Comparison of North American Eastern, Southern, and Western Redcedar Wood

  • Eom, Young Geun (Department of Forest Products, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University) ;
  • Kwon, Ohkyung (Postdoctoral Research Associate, Faculty of Paper Science and Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York) ;
  • Hanna, Robert B. (Faculty of Construction Management and Wood Products Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York) ;
  • Meyer, Robert W. (Faculty of Construction Management and Wood Products Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York)
  • Received : 2007.09.11
  • Accepted : 2007.10.23
  • Published : 2008.03.25

Abstract

Anatomical comparison of 3 North American species with commercial name of redcedar was executed to provide taxonomic information for prevention of confusion and establishment of sound business transaction in the wood market. Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana) and southern redcedar (Juniperus silicicola) could not be separated on the basis of microstructure and ultrastructure of wood. Western redcedar (Thuja plicata), however, appeared to be obviously separated from eastern and southern redcedar in a number of microscopic and ultramicroscopic features. Useful features for separating these two groups were intercellular spaces in transverse surface, latewood width, radial intertracheid pitting, warty layer and pits with torus extensions in tracheids, ray composition, nodular end walls in ray parenchyma cells, and cross-field pitting.

Keywords

References

  1. Alden, H. A. 1977. Softwoods of North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-102, U.S.D.A, For. Ser., For. Prods. Lab., Madison, Wisconsin.
  2. Chedgy, R. J., P. I. Morris, Y. W. Lim, and C. Breuil. 2007. Black stain of western red cedar (Thuja plicata Donn) by Aureobasidium pullulans: The role of weathering. Wood and Fiber Sci. 39(3): 472-483.
  3. Core, H. A., W. A. Cote, and A. C. Day. 1979. Wood structure and identification. 2nd ed., Syracuse University Press, New York.
  4. Eom, Y. G. and B. G. Butterfield. 1997. Anatomical comparisons of compression, opposite, and lateral woods in New Zealand radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). Mokchae Konghak 25: 88-99.
  5. Exley, R. R., B. A. Meylan, and B. G. Butterfield. 1974. Preparation of wood specimens for the scanning electron microscope. J. Microsc. 101: 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1974.tb03865.x
  6. Exley, R. R., B. A. Meylan, and B. G. Butterfield. 1977. A technique for obtaining clean cut surfaces on wood samples prepared for the scanning electron microscope. J. Microsc. 110: 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1977.tb00016.x
  7. Flynn, J. H., Jr. and C. D. Holder. 2001. A guide to useful woods of the world. 2nd ed., Forest Products Society, Madison, Wisconsin.
  8. Hoadley, R. B. 1990. Identifying wood: Accurate results with simple tools. The Taunton Press, Newtown.
  9. IAWA Committee. 2004. IAWA list of microscopic features for softwood identification by an IAWA Committee. H. G. Richter, D. Grosser, I. Heinz & P. E. Gasson (eds.). IAWA J. 25: 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000349
  10. Ilic, J. 1994. Separation of the woods of Callitris glaucophylla (white cypress pine) and Callitris endlicheri (black cypress pine). Recent Advances in Wood Anatomy. Proc. IAWA Wood Anatomy Conference, Rotorua, New Zealand.
  11. Japan Wood Research Society. 1985. Wood science laboratory book. I. Physics and engineering. Chugai Sangyo Chosakai, Tokyo.
  12. Kondo, Y., T. Fujii, Y. Hayashi, and A. Kato. 1996. Organic crystals in the tracheids of Torreya yunnanensis. IAWA J. 17: 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000635
  13. Krahmer, R. L., R. W. Hemingway, and W. E. Hillis. 1970. The cellular distribution of lignans in Tsuga heterophylla wood. Wood Sci. & Tech. 4: 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365298
  14. Liese, W. 1965. The warty layer. In: W. A. Cote (ed.), Cellular ultrastructure of woody plants: 251-269. Syracuse University Press, New York.
  15. Noshiro, S. and T. Fujii. 1994. Fusiform parenchyma cells in the young wood of Pinaceae, and their distinction from marginal parenchyma. IAWA J. 15: 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001374
  16. Panshin, A. J. and C. de Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
  17. Porter, T. 2004. Wood: Identification and use. Guild of Master Craftsman Publications, East Sussex.
  18. Schniewind, A. P. 1989. Concise encyclopedia of wood and wood-based materials. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  19. Walker, A. 2005. The encyclopedia of wood: A tree-by-tree guide to the world's most versatile resource. 2nd ed., Facts On File, New York.
  20. Yatsenko-Khmelevsky, A. A. 1954. The principles and methods of anatomical investigation of wood. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningard.