Removal of Sulfamethoxazole using Ozonation or UV Radiation; Kinetic Study and Effect of pH

오존 처리 및 UV 조사를 이용한 Sulfamethoxazole 제거; 동역학적 고찰 및 pH 영향

  • Jung, Yeonjung (Department of Environmental Engineering, YIEST Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Wangi (Department of Environmental Engineering, YIEST Yonsei University) ;
  • Jang, Hayoung (Department of Environmental Engineering, YIEST Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Yanghwun (Department of Environmental Engineering, YIEST Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh, Byungsoo (Gwangiu Institute of Science and Technology, Center for Seawater Desalination Plant) ;
  • Kang, Joonwun (Department of Environmental Engineering, YIEST Yonsei University)
  • 정연정 (연세대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 김완기 (연세대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 장하영 (연세대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 최양훈 (연세대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 오병수 (광주과학기술원 해수담수화플랜트 사업단) ;
  • 강준원 (연세대학교 환경공학부)
  • Received : 2007.10.16
  • Accepted : 2007.12.12
  • Published : 2008.01.30

Abstract

This study was performed to assess the potential use of ozone or UV radiation for the treatment of water contaminated with sulfamethoxazole (SMX), which is frequently used antibiotic in human and veterinary medicines, especially focusing on the kinetic study and effect of pH. In a study using ozone alone, kinetic study was performed to determine second-order rate constant ($k_{O3,SMX}$) for the reactions of SMX with ozone, which was found to be $1.9{\times}10^6M^{-1}s^{-1}$ at pH 7. The removal efficiencies of SMX by ozone were decreased with increase of pH due to rapid decomposition of ozone under the condition of various pH (2.5, 5.3, 7, 8, 10). In a UV irradiation study at 254 nm, a kinetic model for direct photolysis of SMX was developed with determination of quantum yield ($0.08mol\;Einstein^{-1}$) and molar extinction coefficient ($15,872M^{-1}cm^{-1}$) values under the condition of quantum shielding due to the presence of reaction by-products formed during photolysis. For effect of pH on photolysis of SMX, SMX in the anionic state ($S^-$, pH > 5.6), most prevalent form at environmentally relevant pH values, degraded more slowly than in the neutral state (SH, 1.85 < pH < 5.6) by UV radiation at 254 nm.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국과학재단

References

  1. Boreen, A. L., Arnold, W. A. and Mcnneill, K. (2004). Photochemical fate of sulfa drugs in the aquatic environment: Sulfa drugs containing five-membered heterocyclic groups. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(14), pp. 3933-3940 https://doi.org/10.1021/es0353053
  2. Boxall, A. B. A, Kolpin, D. W., Sorensen, B. and Tolls, J. (2003). Are veterinary medicines causing environmental risk?. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(15), pp. 287A-294A
  3. Dodd, M. C., Buffle, M. O. and Von Gunten, U. (2006). Oxidation of antibacterial molecules by aqueous ozone: Moiety-specific reaction kinetics and application to ozonebased waste water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(6), pp. 1969-1977 https://doi.org/10.1021/es051369x
  4. Hirsch, R., Ternes, T. Haberer, K. and Kratz, K. L. (1999). Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ., 225, pp. 109-118
  5. Hoigne, J. and Bader, H. (1981). Determination of Ozone in Water by the Indigo Method. Water Res., 15(4), pp. 449-456 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90054-3
  6. Hoigne, J. and Bader, H. (1983a). Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water I. Water Res., 17(2), pp. 173-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90098-2
  7. Hoigne, J. and Bader, H. (1983b). Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water II. Water Res., 17(2), pp. 185-194 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(83)90099-4
  8. Huber, M. M., Canonica, S., Park, G. Y. and Von Gunten, U. (2003). Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(5), pp. 1016-1024 https://doi.org/10.1021/es025896h
  9. Kawamura, S. (2000). Integrated design and operation of water treatment facilities, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2nd ed
  10. Kim, S. D., Cho, J. W., Kim, I. S., Vanderford, B. J. and Snyder, S. A. (2007). Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupters in South Korea surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res., 42(5), pp. 1013-1021
  11. Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B. and Buxton, H. T. (2002). Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(6), pp. 1202-1211 https://doi.org/10.1021/es011055j
  12. Langlais, B., Reckhow, D. A. and Brink, D. R. (1991). Ozone in water treatment: Application and engineering, Lewis publichers
  13. Leifer, A. (1988). The kinetics of environmental aquatic photochemistry: Theory and practice, ACS professional reference book
  14. Lindberg, R. H., Bjorkludn, K., Magnus, P. R., Johansson, M. I., Tysklind, M. and Andersson, B. A. V. (2007). Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics in the Swedish environment with emphasis on sewage treatment plants. Water Res., 41(3), pp. 613-619 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.014
  15. National Research Council (1999). The use of durgs in food animals, National academy press, Washington, DC
  16. Nicole, I., Laat, J. De, Dore, M., Duguet, J. P. and Bonnel, C. (1990). Use of u.v. radiation in water treatment: measurement of photonic flux by hydrogen peroxide actinometry. Water Res., 24(12), pp. 157-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(90)90098-Q
  17. Qiang, Z. and Adams, C. (2004). Potentiometric determination of acid dissociation constants (pKa) for human and veterinary antibiotics. Water Res., 38(12), pp. 2874-2890 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.017
  18. Staehelln, J. and Hoigné, J. (1985). Decomposition of ozone in water in the presence of organic solutes acting as promoters and inhibitors of radical chain reactions. Environ. Sci. Technol., 19(12), pp. 1206-1213 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00142a012
  19. Wolfe, R. L. (1990). Ultraviolet disinfection of potable water; current technology and research needs. Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(6), pp. 768-773 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00076a001