Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Availability of Energy and Protein, with Respect to Uric Acid, of Yellow-seeded Rapeseed Meal in Broiler Diets

  • Saki, A.A. (Scientific Staffs of Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University) ;
  • Mahmoudi, H. (Scientific Staffs of Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University) ;
  • Tabatabaei, M.M. (Scientific Staffs of Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University) ;
  • Ahmadi, A. (Scientific Staffs of Animal Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University)
  • Received : 2007.08.23
  • Accepted : 2008.01.14
  • Published : 2008.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the nutritional value of yellow-seeded rapeseed meal (YRSM). In the first experiment nutrient retention was recorded by 48 Arbor Acres-broiler chickens (28-d old) to determine AMEn (nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy), coefficient of apparent protein digestibility based on ileal digesta nitrogen, excreta nitrogen and uric acid nitrogen. The second experiment was carried out with 304 Arbor Acres-broiler chickens to compare effects of SBM (soybean meal) and YRSM on performance, carcass and digestive tract status. In the control treatment, SBM was replaced by graded levels of YRSM at 15, 22.5 and 30% of diet. Digestibility of YRSM protein was significantly lower (p<0.001) than SBM protein. The protein digestibility based on ileal measurement was significantly higher (p<0.001) than protein digestibility from excreta samples. There was no significant difference (p>0.001) between ileal and excreta digestibility of protein based on uric acid. AMEn as a fraction of gross energy was 0.54 in SBM and 0.45 in YRSM. With the exception of 30% YRSM, other YRSM treatments resulted in major effects on length and weight of the gastrointestinal tract. The results of this study have shown no adverse effect on performance as well as protein digestibility and energy value in response to replacement of SBM by YRSM with the exception of 22.5 and 30% YRSM.

Keywords

References

  1. Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:679-697.
  2. Clandinin, D. R. and A. R. Robblee. 1983. Canola meal can be good source of high quality protein for poultry. Feed stuff. 55:36-37.
  3. Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic in feed and faces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  4. Jensen, S. K., Y. G. Liu and B. O. Eggum. 1995. The effect of heat treatment on glucosinolates and nutritional value of rapeseed meal in rats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00740-Z
  5. Kadim, I. T., P. J. Moughan and V. Ravindran. 2002. Ileal amino acid digestibility assay for the growing meat chicken comparison of ileal and excreta amino acid digestibility in the chicken. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:588-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166022000004507
  6. Krogdahl, A. and B. Dalsgard. 1981. Estimation of nitrogen digestibility in poultry: content and distribution of major urinary nitrogen compounds in excreta. Poult. Sci. 60:2480-2485. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0602480
  7. Marquardt, R. R. 1983. A simple spectrophotometric method for the direct determination of uric acid in avian excreta. Poult. Sci. 62:2106-2108. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0622106
  8. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  9. Newkirk, R. W., H. L. Classen and R. T. Tyler. 1997. Nutritional evaluation of low glucosinolate mustard meal (Brassica juncea) in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 76:1272-1277. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.9.1272
  10. Newkirk, R. W., H. L. Classen and M. J. Edney. 2003. Effects of prepress-solvent extraction on the nutritional value of canola meal for broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 104:111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00331-0
  11. Nir, I. and H. Lin. 1982. The skeleton, an important site of lipogenesis in the chick. Anan. Nutr. Metab. 26:100-105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000176551
  12. Noy, Y. and D. Sklan. 1999. Energy utilization on newly hatched chick. Poult. Sci. 78:1750-1756. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.12.1750
  13. Perttila, S., J. Valaja, K. Partanen, T. Jalava and E. Venalainen. 2002. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in protein feedstuffs and diet formulation based on total vs. digestible lysine for poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 98:203-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00031-7
  14. Qiao, H. and H. L. Classen. 2003. Nutritional and physiological effects of rapeseed meal sinapine in broiler chickens and its metabolism in the digestive tract. J. Sci. Food Agric. 83:1430-1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1559
  15. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide: version 6. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  16. Savory, C. J. 1976. Broiler growth and feeding behavior in three different lighting regimes. Br. Poult. Sci. 17:557-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667608416312
  17. Shires, A., J. R. Thompson, B. V. Turner, P. M. Kennedy and Y. K. Goh. 1987. Rate of passage of corn-canola meal and corn-soybean meal diets through the gastrointestinal tract of broiler and white leghorn chickens. Poult. Sci. 66:289-298. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660289
  18. Simbaya, J., B. A. Slominski, W. Guenter, A. Morgan and L. D. Campbell. 1996. The effects of protease and carbohydrase supplementation on the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry: in vitro and in vivo studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61:219-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00939-6
  19. Slominski, B. A., J. Simbaya, L. D. Campbell, G. Rakow and W. Guenter. 1999. Nutritive value for broilers of meals derived from newly developed varieties of yellow-seeded canola. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 78:249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00003-6
  20. Ten Doeschate, R. A. H. M., C. W. Scheele, V. V. A. M. Schreurs and J. D. Van Der Klis. 1993. Digestibility studies in broiler chickens: Influence of genotype, age, sex and method of determination. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:131-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417569
  21. Thomke, S., H. Pettersson, M. Neil and J. Hakansson. 1998. Skeletal muscle goitrin concentration and organ weights in growing pigs fed diets containing rapeseed meal. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 73:207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00156-4
  22. Yap, K. H., I. T. Kadim, R. D. King and P. J. Moughan. 1997. An ileal amino acid digestibility assay for the growing meat chicken-effect of feeding method and digesta collection process. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 10:671-678. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1997.671
  23. Zhang, W. J., L. D. Campbell and S. C. Stothers. 1994. An investigation of the feasibility of the predicting nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy content in barley from chemical composition. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 74:355-360. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas94-048

Cited by

  1. The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals vol.21, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00318