DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Criteria and Evaluation of Local Tidal Flats for Designating Conservation Sites in the Southwestern Coast of Korea

보호지역 지정을 위한 갯벌의 평가기준 개발과 전남 지역갯벌의 평가

  • Chang, Jin-Ho (Department of Marine Resources, Mokpo National University)
  • 장진호 (목포대학교 해양수산자원학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

Designating conservation sites is needed for the preservation and management of tidal flats, and also objective criteria, by which preservation values of tidal flats can be evaluated, are required to designate conservation sites. A set of new evaluation criteria or tidal flats was suggested in this study. The criteria, based on six items including scarcity, diversity, naturalness, uniqueness, destruction possibility and preservation will, ave the advantages with which easy and economic assessments are possible by using basic data from the preceding studies. The evaluation results for the three different tidal lats (Muan, Jeungdo-1 and Jeungdo-2) in the southwestern coast of Korea reveal that all he tidal flats evaluated are classified into grade 2. The tidal flat which got the highest valuation score was Jeungdo-1 tidal flat (86.7), and the next was Muan (85.0) and Jeungdo-2 (82.5). The Jeungdo-2 tidal flat was superior in uniqueness and destruction possibility, and the Muan tidal flat was superior in diversity and naturalness.

Keywords

References

  1. Field J. G., Hempel G., Summerhayes C. P., 2002, Oceans 2020, Island press, 365pp
  2. 한국해양수산개발원, 2002, 해상국립공원의 합리적인 관리방안 연구, 233pp
  3. 환경부, 1999, 국립공원구역 타당성 조사기준, 12pp
  4. 해양수산부, 2006, 연안습지보호지역 지정기준 마련을 위한 워크숍, 18pp
  5. Rattcliff D. A., 1977, A nature conservation review, Cambridge University Press, 25-64
  6. Usher M. B., 1980, An assessment of conservation values within a large site of special scientific interest in North Yorkshire, Field Studies, 5(2), 323-348
  7. Eagles P. F. J., 1984, The planning and management of environmentally sensitive areas, Longman Inc., 40-46
  8. Millard A. B., 1993, Ecological survey and evaluation of the proposed earth centre site, Leeds Metropolitan University, 65pp
  9. London Ecology Unit, 1994, Policy, criteria and procedures for identifying nature conservation sites in London, London Ecology Unit, 9pp
  10. Klijin F., 1994, Ecosystem classification for environmental management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 323pp
  11. Sutherland W. J., Hill D. A., 1995, Managing habitats for conservation, Cambridge University Press, 25-83
  12. English Nature, 1997, Nature conservation objectives in shoreline management plan: a suggested approach, English Nature, 30pp
  13. Kelleher G., 1999, Guidelines for marine protected areas, IUCN, Gland Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK, 107pp
  14. 고창군, 2007, 고창갯벌 습지보호지역 지정계획 (안), 268pp
  15. 한국자원연구소, 1971, 한국지질도(망운도폭) 1:50000, 25pp
  16. 박용우, 1998, 함평만 조석잔차류와 천해조에 관한 수치실험, 석사학위논문, 해양학과, 전남대학교, 광주, 80pp
  17. 국립지리원, 1983, 연안해역 기본조사 보고서(법성포 지역), 60pp
  18. 기상청, 1991, 한국기후표: 제II권 윌별평년값 (1961-1990), 418pp
  19. 장진호, 김여상, 조영길, 1999, 해안침식이 우세한 반폐쇄적 조간대의 퇴적작용: 한국 서해안의 함평만, 한국해양학회지-바다, 4, 117-126
  20. 해양수산부, 2002, 무안갯벌 습지 보호지역 관리계획, 75pp
  21. 환경부, 2003, 우리나라 서남해안 염습지 염생식물 군락의 생태적 현장보존 및 관리기술 개발(중간보고서), 292pp
  22. 이두표, 김상범, 1997, 신안 일대의 조류, 18pp
  23. 수로국, 1994, 수로기술연보(서지 제1101호), 132-149
  24. 해양수산부, 2002, 갯벌 생태계조사 및 지속 가능한 이용방안 연구, 885pp

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination in Intertidal Surface Sediments of Coastal Islands in the Western Part of Jeollanam Province Using Geochemical Assessment Techniques vol.44, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2011.0772
  2. The Satellite Observation for Spatial Changes of Vegetation in Saemangum Tidal Flat vol.23, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2014.23.2.150
  3. A Study on Physical Characteristic of Ground water and Sediment Property in Intertidal Flat of Nakdong River Estuary vol.21, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2015.21.5.467